• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

PURIFI finally did a fully purified passive speaker design! The SPK 16 prototype is here - with a PTT tweeter

Ra1zel

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Messages
536
Likes
1,055
Location
Poland
IMO the only real effect of wide top octave dispersion is expansion of the sweet spot. Reflections aren't really an issue due to air absorption and head shadowing. But the direct sound is more consistent across a wider area, hence the wider sweet spot.
I admit that I didn't directly compare, in the same room, enough speakers with different dispersion widths to form a meaningful opinion on that matter.
Can you point me to that Harman research? After all, some of their most popular monitors (JBL 7-series) have wide and constant dispersion through the top octave. They do poorly on the "preference score" as a result, but Harman obviously released them anyway.

Well, this is more about the final in-room curve, and nothing really stops a constant directivity speaker from achieving the "correct" downward slope, but it's harder than with a speaker that naturally narrows as frequency increases. Harman also displays a bit of inconsistency with how JBl products measure versus Revel products.

Additional blind test results that support my point:

This tweeter looks really impressive. Honestly it's the first since the aforementioned JBL 7-series driver/horn that has my attention as a real potential advance of the art.
We don't have the tweeter measurements by itself yet, so for now, I would expect most of the effect to be due to that special phase plug/coherer and waveguide. Size and linear excursion are similar to BlieSMa T34A.
 

Mario Sanchez

Active Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
161
Likes
277
Does anyone know why Purifi didn't bother with the screws being flush?
maybe because this is still somewhat in a "demo unit" stage? They might sort this out when it hits production, and besides, the screws are round-headed, so less influence versus cup-headed and others from a diffraction standpoint.
 

Da cynics

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
82
Likes
39

The developer is answering directly
 

boXem

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Messages
2,016
Likes
4,888
Location
Europe
maybe because this is still somewhat in a "demo unit" stage? They might sort this out when it hits production, and besides, the screws are round-headed, so less influence versus cup-headed and others from a diffraction standpoint.
Where did you get the info that this speaker will "hit production"?
 

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,114
Likes
12,303
Location
London
Claus Neesgaard Purifi’s CEO has said that they would like the SPK16 to a ‘wider audience’ certainly I would be keen to carry the speaker and associated Purifi amplification.
Keith
 

boXem

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Messages
2,016
Likes
4,888
Location
Europe
Claus Neesgaard Purifi’s CEO has said that they would like the SPK16 to a ‘wider audience’ certainly I would be keen to carry the speaker and associated Purifi amplification.
Keith
I do not see Purifi producing speakers. So two solutions, either opening the design (for DIYers only or even commercial) or licensing the design to another company.
 

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,114
Likes
12,303
Location
London
Perhaps you are right, but I don’t see any obstacles why they couldn’t, they have the drivers, the electronics and a member of their team has already designed a couple of useful loudspeakers.
Keith
 

Ilkless

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
1,769
Likes
3,488
Location
Singapore
Perhaps you are right, but I don’t see any obstacles why they couldn’t, they have the drivers, the electronics and a member of their team has already designed a couple of useful loudspeakers.
Keith

Likely lack of ability to scale production for full speakers, and the associated exorbitant price (e.g. for Grimm).
 
OP
DTTOM37

DTTOM37

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2020
Messages
177
Likes
247
Location
French side of Europe

The developer is answering directly
You'll find more responses from Lars at these Facebook pages:
- DIY Loudpeaker project pad
- Purif-Audio
 

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,063
Likes
10,894
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Probably release the final project specs like crossover parts and exact chassis dimensions including the internal bracing, and let companies or DIY build them to spec. Like EVAL1 was done.
 

DanielT

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2020
Messages
4,801
Likes
4,727
Location
Sweden - Слава Україні
Finally someone who takes edge diffraction serious! :D
So manny speakers have sharp edges (like these great new KEFs - the best Coaxes with Genelec Ones) - it simply makes no sense ...
Well, here the designer Olle Mirsch and his Rondo from 1994:
Screenshot_2023-05-11_134527.jpg


BUT the extremely round shape (it doesn't get rounder than that) creates other problems. Lack of baffle support for example. Rondo has a very steep roll-off after 10 kHz. It should depend, or maybe depends on I should say, its shape on the speaker cube or it's a tweeter itself that rolls off. I really do not know.

Then I can imagine that it will be an omni-like sound, observe I guess. That in itself may well have its pros and cons.:)

Edit:
Aha, now I understand the FR that I attached in a picture. It was clever of Olle Mirsch because it says below the graph:

In simulated free-field measurement from straight ahead, the Rondo exhibits a very straight and gently falling FR. The treble roll-off is a very deliberate choice to compensate for the treble increase that Rondo gives in the listening room due to its construction. 60 degrees from the side, the FR looks almost identical!

By the way, sorry if it was a bit much OT. I just got up to speed.:D
 

Attachments

  • Olle.png
    Olle.png
    239.9 KB · Views: 116
  • Screenshot_2022-12-09_082039.jpg
    Screenshot_2022-12-09_082039.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 126
  • Screenshot_2022-12-09_082102.jpg
    Screenshot_2022-12-09_082102.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 107
Last edited:
OP
DTTOM37

DTTOM37

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2020
Messages
177
Likes
247
Location
French side of Europe
They certainly "could". Would they want to be in competition against their own customers (Speaker companies supposed to buy these drivers at bigger scales), I am not so sure.
+1
My understanding about Purifi Audio is that 2 partners are already involved in the consumer business, and everyone else had a career specifically in B2B.
Why should they compete against other business interests, against their customers and against companies, who are much more experienced/organized with mass market production, quality control, distribution, marketing, customer service and the full Hi-Fi retail rabbit hole?
They (the peole working in/for Purifi) are specialists in what they do and motivated to thrive for excellence in their own domains.
It would be wrong to expect Purifi acting like MoFi's Andrew Jones or Wharfedale's Peter Comeau. Imho, it could be likely that Peter Lyngdorf could integrate this speaker design into one of his business interests. Would be as close at it gets. Could be wrong, though ...
 
Last edited:

boXem

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Joined
Jun 19, 2019
Messages
2,016
Likes
4,888
Location
Europe
Perhaps you are right, but I don’t see any obstacles why they couldn’t, they have the drivers, the electronics and a member of their team has already designed a couple of useful loudspeakers.
Keith
Never said that it was a problem of ability. They claim to be a technology company. A white paper and a know-how demonstrator is consistent with this claim. If they start stocking wood and glue on shelves, I will have some questions for them as a customer :D.
 

Da cynics

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Messages
82
Likes
39
+1
My understanding about Purifi Audio is that 2 partners are already involved in the consumer business, and everyone else had a career specifically in B2B.
Why should they compete against other business interests, against their customers and against companies, who are much more experienced/organized with mass market production, quality control, distribution, marketing, customer service and the full Hi-Fi retail rabbit hole?
They (the peole working in/for Purifi) are specialists in what they do and motivated to thrive for excellence in their own domains.
It would be wrong to expect Purifi acting like MoFi's Andrew Jones or Wharfedale's Peter Comeau. Imho, it could be likely that Peter Lyngdorf could integrate this speaker design into one of his business interests. Would be as close at it gets. Could be wrong, though ...
I completely agree.
However, the fact that we create a superior finished product than any other trading partner, even for the sake of demonstration…
 

Purité Audio

Master Contributor
Industry Insider
Barrowmaster
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
9,114
Likes
12,303
Location
London
Never said that it was a problem of ability. They claim to be a technology company. A white paper and a know-how demonstrator is consistent with this claim. If they start stocking wood and glue on shelves, I will have some questions for them as a customer :D.
Interesting it would seem perfect sense to me that a manufacturer who makes both the drivers and electronics should put them together in an active loudspeaker, as mentioned upthread the speakers could be marketed as Lyngdorf or whatever.
Does anyone currently make a Purifi/Purifi speaker, how many Purifi drivers feature in other manufacturer’s loudspeakers?
Keith
 
Top Bottom