• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

PSI A21-M Monitor Review

Rate this monitor speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 1.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 24 14.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 112 67.9%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 27 16.4%

  • Total voters
    165

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
50,119
Likes
298,165
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of the PSI A21-M professional monitor. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $3,155 each.
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor review.jpg

The Swiss company is much more known for their active low frequency absorbers than speakers. While not looking that unique, the large oval shaped woofer ring, as well as the burgundy color of my review sample sets it apart. As expected, the cabinet is super strong and dense. Back panel shows simplicity in execution:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor back panel review.jpg

There is no DSP here. Only analog filtering with old school class AB amplification! The Swiss logo really stands out! :)

PSI A21-Ms Monitor Measurements
As always, we measure speakers using Klippel NFS and compute the standard, CEA/CTA-2034 family of frequency response and directivity measurements:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor Frequency Response Directivity Measurement.png

Here, we look for flat on axis response (solid black). The A21 almost gets there, sans some variability from 600 to 1 kHz. What is surprising and impressive in this small package is very deep bass extension. We are nearly down to 30 Hz!

The larger woofer beams some before tweeter takes over resulting in some directivity error in crossover region. We see the impact of this in our early window reflection sum:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor early window Frequency Response Directivity Me...png

Note that the model behind this computation is for far field listening. So the impact in near-field will be different. Still, it is something to note as we look at the predicted response:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor predicted in room Frequency Response Directivi...png

We see the hit from our directivity error the most. But also some of the wiggles below 1 kHz. All in all though, we are close. And with a slope that it is downward, it should sound warm.

While beam width is not constant, I appreciate it being wider than it typical is in monitors:

PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor horizontal beam width Measurement.png

This helps with spatial effects assuming side walls are not absorbed. You can see the "fatness" in our normalized graph of the same:

PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor horizontal directivity Measurement.png


Vertical directivity as usual is quite narrow so stay at tweeter axis:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor vertical directivity Measurement.png


Distortion is kept quite low at 86 dBSPL, but not 96:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor THD distortion Measurement.png

PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor THD distortion percent Measurement.png


Indeed, I could see the clipping indicator light on at 96 dBSPL with audible distortion and much more so at 101 dBSPL:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor Low frequency distortion Measurement.png

I have marked with "O" where you should cross over the speaker if you are going to play it loud. And at any rate, avoid 101 dBSPL as we see a fair bit of rise in distortion well into frequency range.

I made near-field measurements but forgot to do so with the port:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor near field Frequency Response Measurement.png

That's probably the reason the waterfall shows resonances not visible above:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor CSD waterfall Measurement.png

Yes, that is a new optimized waterfall graph to make it easier to see what is going on.

Step response shows some irregularities in the woofer:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor step response Measurement.png


PSI A21-M Speaker Listening Tests and Equalization
You can look at hundreds of measurements but still be surprised when you start playing back a speaker. Here, the immediate impact was the warm bass that accompanied higher registers, once again proving the value of that region. Frankly, the sound was so good I could have stopped there and called this an excellent speaker subjectively.

Sub-bass was reproduced far more than it should be in this size speaker. However, it was mildly distorted even at lower volume levels. Nice though, it never badly broke up as I cranked the speaker to as loud as I could tolerate (all testing is in near-field at 1.5 meter or 5 feet).

I was curious about the on-axis response and directivity errors so one by one, created filters for them:
PSI Swiss Made Professional Pro Speaker Monitor Equalization EQ.png

The difference was subtle but to my liking. The boost in the 2 kHz region was especially nice and balanced out taking down the region below.

With this EQ, every reference track I had sounded excellent and very enjoyable.

Conclusions
PSI brings some differentiation to the market with simplicity of the architecture and deep bass extension. The latter makes sense given the company's prior focus on high quality bass reproduction in rooms. Lack of DSP means zero latency. The down side, and it is a small one, is inability to make the small corrections I made with EQ. Dial that into your DAQ (or music player in domestic listening) and you have an excellent speaker.

Yes, price is way up there. Speaker is hand made in Switzerland. And is sold through dealers.

I really liked the PSI A21-M. More than I probably should have based on uncorrected measurements. :) I am going to recommend it.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

Active 2-Way Monitor​

  • Completely analogue circuitry without DSPs
  • Compensated phase response for correct stereo imaging
  • Speakers: 1x 210 mm / 1x 25 mm
  • Power: 280 W + 45 W RMS
  • Frequency range: 38 Hz - 23 kHz (-6 dB)
  • Tolerance: +/-2 dB (44 Hz - 20 kHz)
  • Phase tolerance: +/-45° (250 Hz - 20 kHz)
  • Max. SPL (1 m): 121 dB
  • Balanced XLR input
  • Dimensions: 250 x 400 x 300 mm
  • Weight: approx. 13 kg
 
Great surround speakers for HT.

@amirm - can you measure hiss for active speakers?

As some of the speakers recommended here have slight, but annoying hiss.
 
@amirm - can you measure hiss for active speakers?
I actually tested that subjectively but forgot to note.

I can hear mild hiss with my ear next to tweeter. The tonality is lower in frequency so not very annoying. Its level is quite low. At about 2 feet, I could no longer perceive it.

This is with On/Off test which is much more sensitive than constant on. With it being on, I initially could not hear anything over low level fan noise of my workstation. It was only when I turned it on and off that my ears became sensitive to it.
 
One of the few analog-active speakers left. But IMHO way too expensive.
A Neumann KH 310A is less expensive, despite being 3-way.
 
I heard the smaller a14m in Singapore with the amphion one15. I preferred the a14m and thought it a good speaker. The colour is really exactly how it looks online.Its got a kinda 80's pearl sport car feel to it, I kinda like it.
 
They say they hand tune each one in an anechoic chamber. I see that array of trim pots so it has more than just a crossover.

Their own measurements show flat response. Perhaps there is an accuracy error that could be dialed out of the end of the line testing.
 
Having PSI's expertise about LF solutions (like the AVAA gear, which is pretty nerdy) but insisting of making all-analog monitors is kind of interesting.

I suppose that 2kHz dip wouldn't bother me much but its reduced ability in terms of clean, high-ish level SPL would with some works.

Thanks Amir!
 
Looks like there are 4 (fixed Q) analog parametric equalizers in there or an 8 band 'graphic'.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think it’s a bad speaker, but I can’t really see a compelling reason to choose it when you’re spending over $6,000/pr.

My thoughts as well. And personally the color is not my style at all.

For about the same price I'd take the Ascilab C8C over these all day, everyday.

 
Last edited:
PSI used to place an ‘all analogue’ sticker on each speaker, not sure that is something to be proud of but I suppose exactly the demographic they are aiming for.
Keith
 
You see PSI speakers everywhere around here. There are all good to my ears but yeah expensive. You pay a huge premium for the Swiss brand. Longevity is great.

This speaker was measured by Sound and Recording before and as often the measurements are very close:

1773390523960.png


Optimising the speaker
Code:
cargo run --bin autoeq --release -- --speaker="$SPEAKER" --version asr --measurement CEA2034 --loss speaker-score --min-freq=20 --max-q=6 --peq-model hp-pk --algo autoeq:de --population 30 --maxeval 400000 --tolerance 0.000001 --smooth --smooth-n 6 --strategy adaptivebin --min-spacing-oct 0.06 -n 7

gives:

✅ Pre-Optimization CEA2034 Score: pref=6.144 | nbd_on=0.305 nbd_pir=0.377 lfx=35Hz sm_pir=0.849
✅ Post-Optimization CEA2034 Score: pref=7.199 | nbd_on=0.190 nbd_pir=0.240 lfx=32Hz sm_pir=0.954

Code:
# Speaker: PSI Audio A21-M
# Generated: 2026-03-13 09:34:36

Preamp: -3.0 dB

Filter  1: ON PK Fc    26 Hz Gain +2.96 dB Q 1.00
Filter  2: ON PK Fc   121 Hz Gain +1.52 dB Q 1.65
Filter  3: ON PK Fc   293 Hz Gain -1.14 dB Q 6.00
Filter  4: ON PK Fc   426 Hz Gain -1.09 dB Q 5.73
Filter  5: ON PK Fc   719 Hz Gain +2.19 dB Q 5.68
Filter  6: ON PK Fc  3097 Hz Gain -1.72 dB Q 4.41
Filter  7: ON PK Fc  6744 Hz Gain -1.19 dB Q 6.00

1773391549481.png
 
Last edited:
Great surround speakers for HT.
not really.
One of the few analog-active speakers left. But IMHO way too expensive.
A Neumann KH 310A is less expensive, despite being 3-way.
people buying this are likely into Swiss-made, or the look, or both. With them objectively better and cheaper do not mean much.
 
Back
Top Bottom