• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

PRaT: Real? Measurable? Or just BS?

fas42

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,818
Likes
191
Location
Australia
I've heard systems which subjectively do seem to possess an hard to describe 'driven' character. The sound frequently, though probably inaccurately, just seems to lock into a propulsive groove. This can be an highly satisfying effect with rock, pop, R&B, etc.

The effect appears to be an mid-bass focused phenomena, but is not necessarily an obviously bass prominent sound. In addition, the sound character can feature an coherence, for lack of a better term, across the entire audio spectrum, not just the mid-bass. I suspect there isn't a single metric that quantifies this effect, it likely being due to some confluence of multiple system parameters, maybe including room acoustics.
Ummm ... I tend to call this competent playback - I'm not sure why you call it "probably inaccurately". Yes, the bass lines have an urgency and bite to them, just like the "real thing" - there is a live recording of Cream doing Crossroads, where Jack Bruce's bass guitar drives the song forward with almost a manic intensity; Baker and Clapton are dragged along, seemingly gasping to keep up - if ever a track can be said to be able to test a rig's PRaT this one does ...
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,075
Likes
2,180
Location
UK
I have come across systems which subjectively feel like they're dragging the beat; one registers that the musicians are just going through the motions, and are ready to head to bed ... it's how our hearing is reacting to a type of distortion in the replay; fix that distortion and the sound "springs back to life".
Doesn't that contradict your oft-made assertion that old recordings shine through despite their poor frequency response, distortion, noise?

Why would evolution and our life's experience cause us to register distortion as an indication that people are feeling tired and want to go to bed?
 

fas42

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,818
Likes
191
Location
Australia
Doesn't that contradict your oft-made assertion that old recordings shine through despite their poor frequency response, distortion, noise?

Why would evolution and our life's experience cause us to register distortion as an indication that people are feeling tired and want to go to bed?
The problem is in the replay chain, not in the distortion, etc, of the old recordings.

Again, it's the nature of the distortion that's key, not the level of it - if I was forced to try and analyse it, off the cuff, I would probably say that the quality of the transients has been degraded - if someone has lost motivation in doing something, then they're not as energetic, impulsive in the way they use their body and the "tools" they are holding, and we are quite capable of registering that lack of interest, by the loss of "sharpness" in what our senses pick up.
 

Ken Newton

Active Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Messages
190
Likes
47
Ummm ... I tend to call this competent playback - I'm not sure why you call it "probably inaccurately". Yes, the bass lines have an urgency and bite to them, just like the "real thing" - there is a live recording of Cream doing Crossroads, where Jack Bruce's bass guitar drives the song forward with almost a manic intensity; Baker and Clapton are dragged along, seemingly gasping to keep up - if ever a track can be said to be able to test a rig's PRaT this one does ...

I say, probably inaccurate, because the effect is rather consistent across most program content, giving a decidedly propulsive quality to everything. As such, it seems likely an coloration, although a pleasant one. As far as live music, some of it exhibits this driven quality, while much doesn't. I don't uniformly experience such an effect live.
 
OP
watchnerd

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,414
Location
Seattle Area, USA
I've heard systems which subjectively do seem to possess an hard to describe 'driven' character. The sound frequently, though probably inaccurately, just seems to lock into a propulsive groove. This can be an highly satisfying effect with rock, pop, R&B, etc.

I've had this happen with vinyl and I'm pretty sure it has to do with beat resonances being picked up and amplified by the cartridge in time with the music.

Interestingly, I've experienced it more with cheaper TT's than with higher quality ones.
 

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,452
Likes
15,798
Location
Oxfordshire
By a considerable margin the biggest disappointment I remember in my hifi listening/buying life was hearing Spendor BC1 speakers.
Everybody in the UK hifi world was raving over them so I saved up some money and, consistent with previous experience of needing to listen to stuff myself rather than rely on reviews, asked Spendor for the location of my nearest dealer, which turned out to be in Bath, a beautiful town.
I duly set up an appointment and showed up with some favourite LPs, this would probably be the mid to late 1970s.
Demonstrated on BBC radio 4 broadcast the speech was very impressive, but on music, at a higher level, they were flat and lifeless - I wouldn't have taken them home if they were free.
The thing that was completely absent was any drive or feeling of dynamics. I guessed at the time that they were not only inefficient but had low power handling, so any reasonable volume level took them way past their thermal linear range. I wasn't in any position to measure them, and I haven't heard a pair since.
I would say they were subjectively the antithesis of the Yamaha NS1000s I got some years later and still own and like.
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,075
Likes
2,180
Location
UK
By a considerable margin the biggest disappointment I remember in my hifi listening/buying life was hearing Spendor BC1 speakers.
Everybody in the UK hifi world was raving over them so I saved up some money and, consistent with previous experience of needing to listen to stuff myself rather than rely on reviews, asked Spendor for the location of my nearest dealer, which turned out to be in Bath, a beautiful town.
I duly set up an appointment and showed up with some favourite LPs, this would probably be the mid to late 1970s.
Demonstrated on BBC radio 4 broadcast the speech was very impressive, but on music, at a higher level, they were flat and lifeless - I wouldn't have taken them home if they were free.
The thing that was completely absent was any drive or feeling of dynamics. I guessed at the time that they were not only inefficient but had low power handling, so any reasonable volume level took them way past their thermal linear range. I wasn't in any position to measure them, and I haven't heard a pair since.
I would say they were subjectively the antithesis of the Yamaha NS1000s I got some years later and still own and like.
I have had similar experiences. Was it psychological, the room, or are some people just not hearing the same thing? I was at a hi-fi show recently where one of the exhibitors was chuckling about how a visitor had spotted that the speakers were wired out of phase. He took this as an indication that the visitor had golden ears.
 

Wombat

Master Contributor
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
6,722
Likes
6,463
Location
Australia
By a considerable margin the biggest disappointment I remember in my hifi listening/buying life was hearing Spendor BC1 speakers.
Everybody in the UK hifi world was raving over them so I saved up some money and, consistent with previous experience of needing to listen to stuff myself rather than rely on reviews, asked Spendor for the location of my nearest dealer, which turned out to be in Bath, a beautiful town.
I duly set up an appointment and showed up with some favourite LPs, this would probably be the mid to late 1970s.
Demonstrated on BBC radio 4 broadcast the speech was very impressive, but on music, at a higher level, they were flat and lifeless - I wouldn't have taken them home if they were free.
The thing that was completely absent was any drive or feeling of dynamics. I guessed at the time that they were not only inefficient but had low power handling, so any reasonable volume level took them way past their thermal linear range. I wasn't in any position to measure them, and I haven't heard a pair since.
I would say they were subjectively the antithesis of the Yamaha NS1000s I got some years later and still own and like.


The BC1 is closely related to the BBC LS3/6 outdoor broadcast monitor for OB studio vans(near-field speakers). BBC broadcast monitors tended to focus on speech quality for radio or TV transmission.

https://www.markhennessy.co.uk/rogers/others.htm

The LS3/6 is not included here but the numerical classification for intended BBC monitor use is noted. https://www.markhennessy.co.uk/rogers/bbc_txt.htm

BBC monitor design: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/rdreport_1988_14

BBC monitors: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/search?query=monitor+loudspeaker+ls3/6&submit=
 
Last edited:

Jakob1863

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 21, 2016
Messages
573
Likes
155
Location
Germany
So, in your mind, PRaT is real....but is it measurable or unmeasurable?

First point should be to define what is meant by "measurable/unmeasurable".
Any term like "PRaT" is an attempt to describe an internal process, an impression based on a multidimensional experience and although i´d agree with tomelex that group delay can play a role, it does not mean that there is a single measurable parameter describing the effect.
 

Frank Dernie

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
6,452
Likes
15,798
Location
Oxfordshire
The BC1 is closely related to the BBC LS3/6 outdoor broadcast monitor for OB studio vans(near-field speakers). BBC broadcast monitors tended to focus on speech quality for radio or TV transmission.

https://www.markhennessy.co.uk/rogers/others.htm

The LS3/6 is not included here but the numerical classification for intended BBC monitor use is noted. https://www.markhennessy.co.uk/rogers/bbc_txt.htm

BBC monitor design: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/rdreport_1988_14

BBC monitors: http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/search?query=monitor+loudspeaker+ls3/6&submit=

I have owned LS3/5a and now have the similar Harbeth P3ES-2, I also have KEF LS50s which are not physically similar at all but followed a similar but updated engineering approach to minimising colouration as was taken decades ago for the LS3/5a.
I also have some Harbeth Monitor 40 Actives here, which I have tried but can't get the bass into control in my room so I am just storing them for the owner now.
Both times I have heard the LS5/8 it had the same problem of bloated very low bass. I guess the BBC control rooms have better bass traps than I have.
 

TBone

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
1,191
Likes
348
arghh ... the term PRAT was coined well before digital, generally used to describe the affect of a turntable speed inaccuracy in relation to inherited noise. A loose example; added compliance between drive & platter can often lead to loss of speed stability, blurring hard hit transients. Even a slight speed increase or decrease can have a major affect on sound reproduction quality. Worse yet, inconsistent speed-deviations caused by ...
(huge f`n sigh)
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,075
Likes
2,180
Location
UK
arghh ... the term PRAT was coined well before digital, generally used to describe the affect of a turntable speed inaccuracy in relation to inherited noise. A loose example; added compliance between drive & platter can often lead to loss of speed stability, blurring hard hit transients. Even a slight speed increase or decrease can have a major affect on sound reproduction quality. Worse yet, inconsistent speed-deviations caused by ...
(huge f`n sigh)
Why not just measure the wow and flutter (and other speed & pitch-related statistics)?

If not, don't these factors also affect "emotion", "solidity", "authority", "purity", "joie de vivre", "competence", "musicality", etc. Why not coin some terms including these also?
 

Thomas savage

Grand Contributor
The Watchman
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 24, 2016
Messages
10,260
Likes
16,305
Location
uk, taunton
arghh ... the term PRAT was coined well before digital, generally used to describe the affect of a turntable speed inaccuracy in relation to inherited noise. A loose example; added compliance between drive & platter can often lead to loss of speed stability, blurring hard hit transients. Even a slight speed increase or decrease can have a major affect on sound reproduction quality. Worse yet, inconsistent speed-deviations caused by ...
(huge f`n sigh)
Nice to see you :)
 

TBone

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
1,191
Likes
348
Why not coin some terms including these also?

rube: a term coined for those who consistently pretend without any actual hands on experience or knowledge.
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,075
Likes
2,180
Location
UK
rube: a term coined for those who consistently pretend without any actual hands on experience or knowledge.
Experience and knowledge of what? Prats? PRaT??

I have in the past owned a vinyl gramophone.
 

Cosmik

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,075
Likes
2,180
Location
UK
I have also owned several cassette decks, reel-to-reel machines, video recorders and once made a hand-operated foil cylinder recorder - not great wow and flutter but very 'dynamic' pace, rhythm and timing.
 

TBone

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
1,191
Likes
348
Thomas, don`t remember seeing the Talking Heads live ... but what the bleep do I know ... few months ago I was invited to attend a local Martin Barre concert ... and embarrassingly ... I asked (probably with Locomotive Breath) ... who is Martin Barre.
 
Top Bottom