- Thread Starter
- #61
Lukas,a) that is simply not true and you know that, we never received any of your traps. No one would bring this up two years after they received a product, yet we still wanted to look into this and you failed to make it possible.
b) You are still making up facts and this is the problem here, ECOSE Rock wool is just as safe and ecological as the one we use in Europe, you are desperately looking for an argument why something is wrong with the panels but nothing is wrong with them. Knauf is just as easily found in the UK and doesn't cost more than Isover, you don't really seem to understand the market for building materials, which is fine but then you just make up things. We do not have two different standards, we use two different internal absorption materials that perform the same acoustically AND comply to all the same ecological and health standards. You can repeat your wrong claim over and over and it will not change anything. It is still a wrong claim. No one without an agenda would care about this as we can clearly prove that the material is just as ecological and safe. Just because you had a wrong idea about this whole topic of material science and bought the panels based upon that, doesn't change the fact that you received a product that complies to all the mentioned standards and the brand name of the material is highly irrelevant.
c) No, see above, the contract is not void because we replaced the absorption material with one that complies to the same standards, having to discuss this really is silly.
You have a lot of doubts and ideas and opinions but none of them are based on anything but your own imagination. This has nothing to do with our reputation we just don't let customers blackmail us after three years of owning a product into fully refunding them and keeping the product.
d) I don't know if you haven't read this thread but people have doubts about your story and they are right to do so. While some of the things you say are correct, the implications and claims you take away from those facts are wrong and you don't care about the actual facts which I undermined with data. Your whole approach has been dishonest and to be honest extremely shady and it shows from your attempt to now lure people into a private conversation so you could lie to them without us having a chance to correct you.
You are being dishonest, you leave out important information, you twist the narrative and you ignore the information you are given, all because we didn't give into your attempt to blackmail us. That is what happened here and you know it and people can tell.
This is the email from your Italian colleague Luca Mello Rella from August 2021 replying to my questions about the rockwool used (see attachment) and he also attached the datasheet of the Knauf ECOSE rockwool.
So I definitely bought my panels thinking to buy ECOSE rockwool but you cheated me.
Let people reading this forum decide if the liar is me or you.
Best.
Translation:
--------------------
Good morning Gianluca,
The wool produced by Knauf is actually different from the usual rock wool in terms of color. This is also due to the production process during which energy is saved making it more eco-sustainable than low-cost rock wool. This wool is made of non-breathable fibers and therefore would not pose health risks even if it leaked from the panel, which, unless the panel itself is damaged, will not happen either given that it is entirely covered in fabric. Not even the choice of fabric is random: we chose acoustically transparent fabrics but with textures dense enough to prevent even very small parts of rock wool from leaking out.
We openly say which companies produce the materials we use to make our products so that customers can verify the quality of the raw materials we use. On the Knauf website you should find a lot of information in this regard but I am attaching a technical data sheet from a few years ago with the main characteristics of the material.
If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask them.
Attachments
Last edited: