Roland68
Major Contributor
Right, you're right.I do not criticize the technical review! I have it since 2008 and you do not. I just simply do not advice anyone to buy it second hand.
I haven't had it since 2008, but only since 2015, and I bought it used back then, like other SACD players, both tried-and-true devices and rare gems, some dating back to 2000. CD players dating back to the mid-80s.
That's exactly what many people who attended our tests thought.Likewise. I ultimately trust to my ears and you do not. That's democracy.
Their ears were certainly working perfectly, but their eyes and brains were deceiving them.
There are some very scrupulously conducted tests in which the testers thought they were listening to two different devices. In reality, it was always the same device, and a switch was simply flipped on an empty box.
Nevertheless, most of them heard a clear difference with their preferred device.
We conducted similar tests with audiophiles, as well as with measurement technicians and sound engineers. Once as above, and another time, we actually switched the devices, but reversed the order.
Here, too, the significantly "better" sound remained with the preferred device, even though a different device was playing.
The testers were very upset during these tests, but ultimately had to admit that any test in which you know which device is currently running is completely useless for making a statement about sound. This statement is simply compromised.