Given the importance of Pink Floyd
They're important within the realm of popular music.That needs some justification. In what way are PF important other than in Roger Waters' imagination?
They're important within the realm of popular music.
Well you'd have to ask the o/p what he meant. I was too young to know or care about the whole punk vs dinosaur rock thing. I like them both.Yes, but how are they important?
Their musical influence was pretty much over by the time Syd was defenestrated. And by the late 70s they were almost exclusively the main symbol of everything that was wrong with rock music as evidenced by Paul Cook's t-shirt further up the thread. I suppose that's a form of importance but I feel that's not what OP meant ...
Did you know that this guitar giant helped create parts of that solo?A source of inspiration so to speak:The guitar solo at the end of Another Brick in the Wall Part 2 is one of my all-time favorites.
"One of the Few" is one of my all time favorites, I like both very simple or very dense stuff.I like 'The Final Cut' .Possibly I'm the only one?
'Animals' is my favourite. I'm not much for the Syd Barrett years.
This thread is enlightening.
Does anyone like cheese or have a favourite floor cleaning product?
DSOTM, a great album.I was 17 when DSOTM was released, and saw it performed at Blossom Music Center that summer (1973). Prior to (and still) Meddle was by far my favorite. When I first heard DSOTM I wasn't sure how I felt about it. Too much in the way of radio ready songs, and lyrics that were tied to the real world bothered me compared to where they had been. But I did get on the DSOTM train, and still listen to it occasionally. It has aged, but not terribly. The rest of their catalog after DSOTM I find variable. I can't listen to The Wall. Never could. It has some moments, but I find it heavy handed, both musically, and particularly lyrically. For me, the magic of PF is and always was the musical interplay of Gilmour and Wright.
I think if Pink Floyd had shortened it to one album, The Wall would have been great.
Have to disagree with this..."improved," no - more accessible for the mainstream, yes. The grab-bag nature of double albums is unique..."portmanteau" in nature. Exile, to me, is completely enjoyable all the way through, it was a Stones pinnacle. And not overly long. The White Album is, I'll paraphrase Paul here, "the f****** White Album." All of these could be shortened, but in doing so, they would not have the sheer SLAM that they had on each artist's catalogue.It would join the list of double albums that would be improved by editing them down to a single albums:
Exile on Main Street
Physical Graffiti
London Calling & Sandinista
Tales from Topographic Oceans
The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway
Blonde on Blonde
Songs in the Key of Life
The White Album
Maybe the The River, and Goodbye Yellowbrick Road, although like The Wall I can't say there's enough for a good single album.
Ha ha, thank you. Same here. For me, they're one of those bands I consistently avoid. Their songs contain good ideas, but the execution is awful – lame, soulless, cold. Strangely enough, almost every cover version of their songs is far superior to the original.Can’t stand them.![]()
I like Floyd a lot, favorite is DSOM on Lp. They did an interesting live event I think at Pompeii ?? I like their more spacey music.
It was the first song I ever heard on CD too.The main thing I remember about Pink Floyd is that when you went to a hifi store in the 70s, every turntable, amp and/or speaker demo came with a required spin of Money from Dark Side of the Moon.