• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Phono preamp headroom - why?

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I'm familiar with the Hagerman site and a number of others that discuss cartridge loading. But let's say the resonance you're referring to is sufficiently dampened and can be reasonably ignored for this purpose. In that case, it appears to me that 1V is a much greater amplitude than will ever be input to the preamp from a nominal 5mV cartridge. More to the point, it would help me to know how this level of signal handling compares to other vacuum tube preamps. I searched ASR for review specifications, but only found solid state units. It's not clear to me whether their signal handling capabilities represent benchmarks for comparison with tube type preamps. Those I've seen here so far exhibit overload characteristics well below 1V input.

Jack
Assume the typical MM cartridge with 5mV output @5cm/s.

Worst case assumptions (simplified):
- max. cutting speed 50-70cm/s -> +20...+23dB (see graphic in post #7)
- resonance peak MM cartridge around 20kHz -> + 6dB
-> max. cartridge output approx. 100mV

With 40dB gain you get 10V at the phono pre output.

This will not happen, however, with most records and well terminated MM cartridge...

Edit: link to post #7 added, calculation revised
 
Last edited:
Assume the typical MM cartridge with 5mV output @5cm/s.

Worst case assumptions (simplified):
- max. cutting speed 80cm/s -> +24dB
- resonance peak MM cartridge -> + 6dB
-> max. cartridge output approx. 158mV

With 40dB gain you get 15.8V at the phono pre output.

This will not happen, however, with most records and well terminated MM cartridge...
Resonance peak can be as much as 20dB FWIW.
 
The L-C resonance is normally above the audio range so the RIAA equalization should knock it down by about 20dB (relative to the gain at 1kHz).
 
Assume the typical MM cartridge with 5mV output @5cm/s.

Worst case assumptions (simplified):
- max. cutting speed 80cm/s -> +24dB
- resonance peak MM cartridge -> + 6dB
-> max. cartridge output approx. 158mV

With 40dB gain you get 15.8V at the phono pre output.

This will not happen, however, with most records and well terminated MM cartridge...
If it happens, it will either clip the following preamp or eventually the power amp, and if you're unlucky you kill a tweeter. IMV it makes no sense to allow a phono stage to emit such high voltages. You just move the problem higher up in the chain.

What we really need is a phono stage that does not lengthen a clipped signal. The recovery time needs to be as short as possible. This can be done, e.g. using a limiter after the first stage to prevent the following stages to clip.
 
Assume the typical MM cartridge with 5mV output @5cm/s.

Worst case assumptions (simplified):
- max. cutting speed 80cm/s -> +24dB
- resonance peak MM cartridge -> + 6dB
-> max. cartridge output approx. 158mV

With 40dB gain you get 15.8V at the phono pre output.

This will not happen, however, with most records and well terminated MM cartridge...
After reading your post, it's apparent that my description of the preamp's performance isn't nearly sufficient to render a meaningful opinion. I have now made the necessary bench measurements to better define the gain structure and to quantify the maximum signal level at each stage. This data will need to be compiled in order to produce headroom numbers at both ends of the spectrum. I'll come back to this discussion once the work is complete, hopefully in a day or two. Thanks for posting those numbers.

Jack
 
Resonance peak can be as much as 20dB FWIW.
My first iteration of the current project used the first stage in triode mode. Input C must have been truly excessive, because the upper mids were really biting my ears. Reconfiguring in pentode appears to have resolved that issue. Additional work necessary to verify all this (as well as headroom and other characteristics) is upcoming.

Jack
 
The L-C resonance is normally above the audio range so the RIAA equalization should knock it down by about 20dB (relative to the gain at 1kHz).
With a MM cartridge the resonance peak usually happens in or near the upper audible range. MC resonance peak is much higher of course.

The input stage and all following stages should not clip ideally. RIAA equalization comes after input stage, so if the mess already happened there, the RIAA eq does not help any more.
 
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I'm familiar with the Hagerman site and a number of others that discuss cartridge loading. But let's say the resonance you're referring to is sufficiently dampened and can be reasonably ignored for this purpose. In that case, it appears to me that 1V is a much greater amplitude than will ever be input to the preamp from a nominal 5mV cartridge. More to the point, it would help me to know how this level of signal handling compares to other vacuum tube preamps. I searched ASR for review specifications, but only found solid state units. It's not clear to me whether their signal handling capabilities represent benchmarks for comparison with tube type preamps. Those I've seen here so far exhibit overload characteristics well below 1V input.

Jack

Jack, (IMHO) I think you have that all back to front…

Namely worrying about the specs for the headroom being too high is odd:
Can it ever really be too high?

And not worrying about the resonance makes no sense as that is both what can require the HR to be high, AND it is something that is easy to have intermod products that will/can show up in the audio range.

I’d be worrying about getting the correct loading 1st, and having headroom is something to lick the lips over, not something to think is somehow bad.
 
If it happens, it will either clip the following preamp or eventually the power amp, and if you're unlucky you kill a tweeter. IMV it makes no sense to allow a phono stage to emit such high voltages. You just move the problem higher up in the chain.

What we really need is a phono stage that does not lengthen a clipped signal. The recovery time needs to be as short as possible. This can be done, e.g. using a limiter after the first stage to prevent the following stages to clip.
Another - better - solution would be a phono pre with variable gain adjustable to the record you are playing (reduce gain for records cut very loud).

Edit: I really like the separate input and output gain setting with level information and clipping indicator of my Waxwing (also available when using the mic pre of my Fireface).
 
Last edited:
Jack, (IMHO) I think you have that all back to front…

Namely worrying about the specs for the headroom being too high is odd:
Can it ever really be too high?

And not worrying about the resonance makes no sense as that is both what can require the HR to be high, AND it is something that is easy to have intermod products that will/can show up in the audio range.

I’d be worrying about getting the correct loading 1st, and having headroom is something to lick the lips over, not something to think is somehow bad.
Where did you get that? I never said headroom was too high. I would simply like to compare this to other tube preamps to get a better idea of where it stands. As a matter of fact, I fired up SPICE this evening and reworked the output stage to increase the maximum output swing. I'll make the physical circuit changes in a day or two and take new measurements. I expect this will benefit headroom at lower frequencies. About the resonance issue, the pentode in this front end exhibits a truly tiny amount of input capacitance. In fact, I'll likely need to add 100pF or so to flatten response. If it sounds like I'm not worried, that's why. I certainly do agree regarding the necessity of proper loading, and that's something I'll tackle after the preamp proper is completely vetted.

Jack
 
The input stage and all following stages should not clip ideally.
Yep.
RIAA equalization comes after input stage, so if the mess already happened there, the RIAA eq does not help any more.
To prevent this just include RIAA equalization into the gain of the input stage (for MM at least). With up to 40 dB less gain at 20 kHz compared to the gain at 20 Hz you reduce the chance to clip the input stage by high frequency signals significantly.
 
Another - better - solution would be a phono pre with variable gain adjustable to the record you are playing (reduce gain for records cut very loud).
IME the difference in signal level is not that much to warrant this. Variable gain is difficult to implement in a first gain stage with RIAA EQ, and it's not necessary as such a gain stage is not prone to clip in the first place (see my posting above).
 
Assume the typical MM cartridge with 5mV output @5cm/s.

Worst case assumptions (simplified):
- max. cutting speed 50-70cm/s -> +20...+23dB (see graphic in post #7)
- resonance peak MM cartridge around 20kHz -> + 6dB
-> max. cartridge output approx. 100mV

With 40dB gain you get 10V at the phono pre output.
Just to add, I'm in the process of re-biasing the output stage. That will increase maximum output capability to something like 25V. The input stage can handle more than 1V from the cartridge. If post #7 and your simplified calcs are accurate, I don't see how this preamp could ever be overloaded.

Jack
 
Yep.

To prevent this just include RIAA equalization into the gain of the input stage (for MM at least). With up to 40 dB less gain at 20 kHz compared to the gain at 20 Hz you reduce the chance to clip the input stage by high frequency signals significantly.
A lot was discussed earlier in this thread, and I recommend to read the postings from Michael Fidler earlier, e.g.

Post in thread 'Phono preamp headroom - why?'
 
Last edited:
The L-C resonance is normally above the audio range so the RIAA equalization should knock it down by about 20dB (relative to the gain at 1kHz).
The problem is that 20dB peak can overload some phono section inputs with certain cartridges.

Really? That must be ear piercing.

Can you provide examples?
Please look at the link in this post.

If it happens, it will either clip the following preamp or eventually the power amp, and if you're unlucky you kill a tweeter. IMV it makes no sense to allow a phono stage to emit such high voltages. You just move the problem higher up in the chain.

What we really need is a phono stage that does not lengthen a clipped signal. The recovery time needs to be as short as possible. This can be done, e.g. using a limiter after the first stage to prevent the following stages to clip.
The best way to do it is to load the MM cartridge, thus killing the resonance.
Yep.

To prevent this just include RIAA equalization into the gain of the input stage (for MM at least). With up to 40 dB less gain at 20 kHz compared to the gain at 20 Hz you reduce the chance to clip the input stage by high frequency signals significantly.
Noise (including Johnson noise) then becomes a problem...
 
LTig: The best way to do it is to load the MM cartridge, thus killing the resonance.

Noise (including Johnson noise) then becomes a problem...
Not necessarily. You could add an emitter follower within the feedback loop to increase output current capability, or something similar.
 
Not necessarily. You could add an emitter follower within the feedback loop to increase output current capability, or something similar.
How would that work with the RIAA characteristic ahead of the input stage?

The thing is, you have to deal with the resonance in a MM cartridge. This is because sometimes it occurs in the upper region of the audio band. The RIAA characteristic will not correct it. So the proper fix is to load the cartridge properly (which most people don't do).
 
How would that work with the RIAA characteristic ahead of the input stage?
Nothing - it just makes sure that the headroom is maximised without negative consequences in case of clipping.
The thing is, you have to deal with the resonance in a MM cartridge. This is because sometimes it occurs in the upper region of the audio band. The RIAA characteristic will not correct it. So the proper fix is to load the cartridge properly (which most people don't do).
Absolutely yes. Still one should apply RIAA EQ in the first gain stage of MM pickups to optimize the headroom. What's wrong with this?
 
My apologies for dredging up this old thread….

it appears the front end can handle a little more than 1V RMS.

Reading through the information here, it seems to be agreed (?) in general terms that a MM phono preamp should be capable of 20dB above a 5mV nominal input (50mV), or better yet, 26dB (100mV). Considering my measurement is an order of magnitude greater than this, I'm wondering if I've misinterpreted the basic foundation of this thread. ...

Please go easy, I'm still new to this. :)

Jack

I suppose that I inferred it.
 
Back
Top Bottom