• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Passive pre, what potentiometer to use

dogmamann

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
816
Likes
513
I want to connect a passive potentiometer between my dac Topping e30ii and a power amp Arcam P80. What should I look for while selecting the potentiometer ? For example: alps rk27 100k, 50k and so on..
 

raindance

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
1,040
Likes
971
You want the lowest usable impedance. Typically I would start with 10K. Audio taper. My preference is Alps Blue from Parts Express, but they don't always have good channel matching (you can buy a couple and measure them and pick the best). Or you can just buy a Schiit Sys (although it uses a lower quality pot).
 
OP
D

dogmamann

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
816
Likes
513
Should it match the input impedance of the power amp somehow ?
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
3,016
Likes
3,966
Typically I would start with 10K. Audio taper.
I'll 2nd that. 10K is about right and audio taper is a requirement. I don't know if you'll find a spec for "channel" tracking/matching and that's the main thing I'd be concerned with. I've had pots where you could hear the mismatch and pots where there was "play" between the front and back pots.
 

raindance

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
1,040
Likes
971
Should it match the input impedance of the power amp somehow ?
It should be at least 10x less, typically, but in this case will be a compromise because you don't want to load the source too much and under normal listening conditions your amp will probably see about a 5K source impedance using a 10K pot.
 
OP
D

dogmamann

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 16, 2022
Messages
816
Likes
513
It should be at least 10x less, typically, but in this case will be a compromise because you don't want to load the source too much and under normal listening conditions your amp will probably see about a 5K source impedance using a 10K pot.
when we connect a DAC to an integrated amp, theoretically the source is loaded this way,right?
 

JeffS7444

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Messages
2,363
Likes
3,546
Could be as simple as this:
https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/bourns-inc/PDB182-E420K-103A/3780709
Have tried cheapo ganged pots which actually had pretty decent tracking. Can't say that I've ever noticed a sonic difference between something like this, Goldpoint step attenuators built with bulk-foil resistors ($$$) or other exotics. Maybe spending a couple more bucks for conductive plastic type would be a worthwhile upgrade.

When using a passive "pre", keep cable capacitance low, give preference to sources with low output impedance. In this sense, using an active volume control makes life a lot simpler! And if you opt for an active solution, then you have the option to try circuits designed to use linear potentiometers which typically track very well.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,387
Likes
4,523
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
A cheapo Omeg 10k log film pot will do just fine (the £2.50 or so green colour one). The maker I know who used them did an 'upgrade' to a stepped attenuator shunt type with I believe, a 47k inline resistor and different shunt resistors across the load to cut the levels down, this meaning that eacxh volume 'step' alters th eloading seen by both the source and the power amp the thing is feeding. Maybe it doesn't matter, but I hate variables like this...
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,375
Likes
24,594
For best results: the attenuator should not alter the impedance as a function of attenuation.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,702
Likes
37,442
It should be at least 10x less, typically, but in this case will be a compromise because you don't want to load the source too much and under normal listening conditions your amp will probably see about a 5K source impedance using a 10K pot.
It will see a maximum of a 5 kohm source impedance, which will occur at -6 db. At higher and lower volume settings source impedance is less.

If you have a choice, put the passive pre very close to the power amp. Half meter interconnect maybe, and it reduces how much the source impedance matters to the power amp.

At different times I've used lots of variations. The inexpensive Bourne pot someone posted a link to is quite fine.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,702
Likes
37,442
For best results: the attenuator should not alter the impedance as a function of attenuation.
It won't alter the input impedance, but output impedance will vary in a pot. A switched resistor unit can be made that keeps both ends under more control.

The P80 amp has an input impedance of 22k ohms so keeping the pot output impedance low and keeping the interconnect length to the amp short is a good idea.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,702
Likes
37,442
One method I've used is to have a metal film resistor in series usually 4700 ohms. Use a 100 kohm log taper pot to vary the resistance between ground and the output side of the series resistor. This way max output impedance is not more than 4700 ohms and that only occurs at max volume. All other settings are lower. This means the input impedance seen by the DAC varies, but if 4700 is okay then it will always be that or higher.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
16,004
Likes
36,221
Location
The Neitherlands
I want to connect a passive potentiometer between my dac Topping e30ii and a power amp Arcam P80. What should I look for while selecting the potentiometer ? For example: alps rk27 100k, 50k and so on..

Alps RK27 10kA will be fine. The ones I use have good tracking and have never given me problems such as scratch and feel nice when adjusting.

It will load the DAC with 6.8k (at full volume) to 10k (volume at 0) which is perfectly fine for E30-II and the source impedance of the DAC is not raised too much (input capacitance and interlink cable capacitance) can start to play a role.
 

Jim Shaw

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
616
Likes
1,159
Location
North central USA
Instead of rolling your own, you might consider this: Schiit SYS passive 'preamp' $49.
81HHvGN+ppL._AC_SL1500_.jpg
 

pma

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
4,602
Likes
10,769
Location
Prague
This is my best "passive pre ever" :), confirmed by measurements and listening, completely immune to EMI in the environment.

best_passivepre.jpg
 
Top Bottom