Check out the house, the senate, UK Parliament . . . .
Ah, a similar (but not very common) idiom in English is when someone says that “something” gave them or almost gave them an aneurysm.
It's like when you buy an expensive car, sunglasses etc - it's for when you want something that screams "I have literally no taste at all".
"Politics is show business for ugly people" - Paul Begala
I think the proper answer is "No!", ha!
If a car has a maximum speed of 10 km/h (or 6 mph), a maximum autonomy of 20 km (12 miles) and so on for all its performance, do you need to test drive it to know it is a piece of utter junk?
You forgot the ugly door knobs
It is a broken unit! By design. And implementation.Can't believe nobody argued this must be a broken unit
You can have many people test a unit and people will still believe the YouTube glowing reviews. Everyone thinks that "just giving subjectivists the right information" will cause them to change their mind. Clearly a small few will, but the majority will respond that tests don't mean anything. Many audio people have dealt with this attitude, including Amir. Many times subjectivists come onto this site and when shown the data and testing, they want to say the data is worthless. Most double and triple down on this thought and do so with so much venom they are usually banned. So, you had a great idea but it has been done MANY, MANY times. We already know the answer.
I said thanks to Amir when my pretty bad headphones were tested. I use them for tv, since the wife doesn't want to listen to my shows with all the cinema explosions, car crashes and such. They work for what I want them for, but they are not audiophile worthy yet. So, I learned from the test, even though it was not a glowing test.But look at it from poor @amirm's perspective. He is like the Grinch bringing bad news to some member who was kind enough to pass his Pass to him.
Some thank you!
Yep.........Viva Foot-Ball.
Not too much to enjoy in Italy
