I don't think that's fair.
Being talented in whatever he's talented in doesn't mean he's perfect or can make perfect products.
Especially when he's ideologically/technically limiting himself to certain topologies/components.
Lots of talented people have designed audio products that measure badly. Human hearing is very limited and forgiving.
From what I could find his design process is backwards and inherently biased, so it's more of a surprise that the products don't measure worse: measurements only to get the basics right instead of for performance tuning iterations, followed by sighted (inherently biased) listening tests for "tuning".