Do you know what JFETs Parasound uses? JFETs apparently vary a lot. If they somehow still have the old Toshiba low noise ones, the above may overstate the case.
As for as actual difference with non JFET amps. A23+ THD < 0.06% at full power, Monolith < 0.03% the latter being typical. Would it make a difference?
@pma ,
@restorer-john any thoughts on the use of JFETs from your experience?
According to the marketing material the Halo line uses Toshiba 2SJ74 J-FETs, on the input stage.
Jumping in with my own experience, coming from an Emotiva XPA amplified L&R, to a Parasound A21+. The results were a bit startling.
The Parasound really gave my system the sound signature I was seeking. Not colored in any way. Just honest, clean, authoritative and low bass like I hadn't heard before. From any of my speakers (sans subwoofers).
The Halo line uses JFets on the input stage, Mosfets on the driver stage (JFets for the "voicing", Mosfets to drive the outputs, since the JFets can distort and don't like being driven hard as another member mentioned), and finally Sanken BJTs as the output stage. It is this combination that provides low distortion, a slightly warm, yet largely transparent sound and coupled with 16 - 24 or more bipolar transistors for the big power numbers. I have not heard audible distortion of any kind from the amp, at any level I push. It sounds great.
I have called Parasound directly a couple different occasions after I bought my A21+, just to pick their brains and ask some questions that had come into my mind during the first week of ownership. Each time the phone was answered in the first few rings, and I spoke with a gentleman whom was part of the engineering/design team actually in the shop where they test the outgoing products. I think his name was Phil? He was more than happy to talk shop, & answer any and all of my questions regardless of time constraints. Truly great customer service.
I asked him about the bias point on my A21+, and he agreed it was around 6 watts. But that is PER CHANNEL! I thought It was total. So that was a nice surprise. He went on to state that on the (+) line they really beefed things up, so even with that 6 watts class A per channel, the magic is minimizing the crossover point distortion. So once the bias point has been achieved, the transition begins. However the change from A - B is gradual such that, the class A power is
more like 10 watts/channel. Taking into account the amp idles at 160watts when on with no signal input, I believe this wasn't an exaggeration.
I've also watched several interviews with John Curl where he states in reference to the Halo line, they all use the same parts. Just the larger, more expensive amps make use of more parts. More output BJTs, more heatsink, more capacitance (the exception I believe is use of Nichicon Gold Tune in the JC1+) a larger power supply. Pretty cool.
After my positive experience with their Halo line (P5 preamp and A21+) my Dad was in search of an amp for his workshop and home gym area. Even though supply chain issues elevated the price, at my suggestion we tried a 2125 V2. For a 'lower' wattage amp, the thing is still pretty darn big. For a Class A/B design, to a point I guess it has to be. But the pictures can be deceiving. Some empty chassis space may be seen, but there are slots for cooling throughout and It runs warm, but not hot. Connected to a TA-100 preamp he's back blasting all his music the way he likes it.
What may be held back in 'premium parts' for the lower cost amps from Parasound, the design philosophy still trickles down.