Iiuc, this is analogous to trying to compete in The Pepsi Challenge. If the test is just a sip or two then statistically more people prefer the sweeter drink. The story changes if you give testers a suitable amount of time to enjoy a whole can in a way and context typical of how they might enjoy a can of soda.My point of view of Paradigm is that they know the research. But they have also survived in the brutal speaker retail market for decades. As such, they have sacrificed some of what research says to compete on the showroom floor with likes of Klipsch. So not a surprise that the highs are accentuated.
Market segmentation. I'm inclined to think that some do because it would be foolish not to. A local dealer has the whole Paradigm line and is well prepared to let you compare. Playing the speaker inside the budget you initially mentioned and then a more expensive one must surely be a good sales technique but only if the more expensive one is really likely to be more pleasing to the listener.I wonder if speaker companies deliberately "mis-engineer" their low-end products to avoid cannibalizing on the market share of their higher-end products.
Wait, what?I heard some youtube videos of this speaker and thought it sounded thin and bright.
I wonder if speaker companies deliberately "mis-engineer" their low-end products to avoid cannibalizing on the market share of their higher-end products.
No, because every sound we hear in real life is already subject to our hearing sensitivity, and sounds correct to us.Is the freq response really that bad?
Would it actually work better for those who don't use eq, considering hearing sensitivity?
View attachment 95790
Interesting point. Certainly probably true with me. Yet bottom end speakers like the atom wouldn’t seem to be the market for older audiophiles unless they were downsizing?I would think a rising high end, is helpful to most audio minded people.
I know my hearing is not what it was even 10 year ago. I am mid 50s now and what sounds okay treble wise, 10 years ago would have been a bit too much.
I mean who exactly buys passive speakers now? Not younger people.
Maybe the rising upper end trend is tied in to the hearing of people over 45, who tend to be audiophiles??
Wait, what?
How can you "hear" a you tube video of this speaker? I see this often but have never understood how "listening to a speaker" on a you tube video, on your speakers, would in any way resemble actually listening to the speaker that is being played on you tube????
Funny you should say that. Around that time period, a friend of mine was going through budget bookshelf speakers like candy, buying up all of the stuff at Magnolia Audio: B&W DM600, Paradigm Atom, Wharfedale Diamond... They all sounded pretty much the same to me, maybe with slightly different seasoning.Interesting. When I heard these after much hype, I thought to myself, "Did B&W start making speakers for Paradigm?" Also like B&W, I really liked the Paradigm of ~20 years ago.
Yeah, but I thought high freq drop off more than mid and bass when listening distance from the speakers increases? With typically listening distance of maybe 8 ft, a speaker measured flat at 3 ft would sound duller?No, because every sound we hear in real life is already subject to our hearing sensitivity, and sounds correct to us.
I think it is actually quite difficult to make a low-cost, great-sounding speaker. Every penny has to be watched at the low-cost end. What's interesting to me is that I cannot think of a low-cost speaker that has much of an aftermarket for improved crossovers to get better performance from the drivers. My naive assumption is that a good crossover might cost as much as the rest of the speaker.Market segmentation. I'm inclined to think that some do because it would be foolish not to. A local dealer has the whole Paradigm line and is well prepared to let you compare. Playing the speaker inside the budget you initially mentioned and then a more expensive one must surely be a good sales technique but only if the more expensive one is really likely to be more pleasing to the listener.
I mean who exactly buys passive speakers now? Not younger people.
No, because every sound we hear in real life is already subject to our hearing sensitivity, and sounds correct to us.
I suppose you could get something out of it if you had a set of great speakers that were EQ'd horizontally flat at your listening position (ie no Harman Curve downslope) - you might be able to get some tonality out of it, but there's loads of variables at play on the side where the person recorded the speakers....I wouldn't imagine it's worth much for creating impressions.Sorry but I don't understand this - wouldn't the sound you hear on youtube depend on the mic used to record the speaker, and more importantly the speakers you are using to listen to the video?
I suppose you could get something out of it if you had a set of great speakers that were EQ'd horizontally flat at your listening position (ie no Harman Curve downslope) - you might be able to get some tonality out of it, but there's loads of variables at play on the side where the person recorded the speakers....I wouldn't imagine it's worth much for creating impressions.
Sorry but I don't understand this - wouldn't the sound you hear on youtube depend on the mic used to record the speaker, and more importantly the speakers you are using to listen to the video?
Those look great! and it the tweeters have a solid phase plug too.I've been running an older floorstander version of this for years. Can definitely vouch for the high end - it is very hyped. Running calibrations is hilarious - compared to my Martin Logans, it sounds like the Paradigms have response to 100,000hz. The sweep just goes on forever where the MLs roll off much earlier.
I think the Paradigms are vastly better than the more common big box retailer speakers you'd get in the same price bracket. The aesthetics sans grille are fantastic.
View attachment 95883
Yup, those are just a couple of things included under "loads of variables at play on the side where the person recorded the speakers" that I mentioned.Still cannot control for the mics used for the recording, and any compression applied by youtube.