Wow you don't know how to leave something do you?So, either you work for Genelec and know something the rest of us don't, or you are just insisting that you know they won't be worried, purely out of arrogance.
Anyway, given both companies sell studio monitors aimed at both the home studio and hifi markets, I would suggest that Genelec may well be concerned if Palmer starts eating into a significant part of their market share.
Given the apparent quality and value of the product being discussed here, this is a distinct possibility.
Obviously the big pro studio market is different. Big studios have big budgets. But this product is not really aimed at this market. My 2c.
Yes, it’s interesting that they are following the discussion.Genelec reacted in this thread quite early.
Seems they take this alu-cardioid-coax Orbit 11 seriously.
KR
We appreciate @Ilkka Rissanen participation but they are not 'Genelec' the company. I didn't think that had to be said.Genelec reacted in this thread quite early.
Seems they take this alu-cardioid-coax Orbit 11 seriously.
KR
And thats where the coaxial and cardioid elements of the speaker come to play, less room dependant.I’m very ambivalent about this speaker. On the one hand, I find the specs impressive, and on paper I’d be thrilled to get a full‑range monitor at this kind of price. But at the same time, I also know that to integrate these speakers properly into my room and actually gain more than I lose I’d have to spend money and invest many hours of research and work to make them a real upgrade for both my mixes and my casual listening (I do both in my home studio). In the end, even if they live up to their promises, I’ll probably end up choosing monitors that don’t go as low but are paired with multiple subs. (These monitors lose much of their appeal if they’re not used full‑range imo.)
The reason I’m warning about how difficult it is to integrate a full‑range loudspeaker in a domestic space is that, from experience, I know amateurs already tend to completely overlook acoustic treatment even when they spend €10,000 on a pair of large monitors. So with compact €1,600 speakers that go below 30 Hz, I’m genuinely worried we’ll soon see a lot of them on the used market because people will buy them without realizing they’re beasts that require real integration work, and potentially acoustic investments far exceeding the price of the speakers themselves.
As for me, I haven’t made my decision yet since i should take care of my room first, and in any case, I generally avoid being an early adopter. It has saved me from some major disappointments more than once.
Pot calling the kettle black methinks.Wow you don't know how to leave something do you?
Golf clap
Yes, that is exactly my experience. I am an owner of these speakers, and, as you correctly state, they are wild beasts. Without taming the low-end, one way or another, I'd go as far as saying the speakers are practically unuseable in an untreated room. Boomy and overwhelming bass.I’m very ambivalent about this speaker. On the one hand, I find the specs impressive, and on paper I’d be thrilled to get a full‑range monitor at this kind of price. But at the same time, I also know that to integrate these speakers properly into my room and actually gain more than I lose I’d have to spend money and invest many hours of research and work to make them a real upgrade for both my mixes and my casual listening (I do both in my home studio). In the end, even if they live up to their promises, I’ll probably end up choosing monitors that don’t go as low but are paired with multiple subs. (These monitors lose much of their appeal if they’re not used full‑range imo.)
The reason I’m warning about how difficult it is to integrate a full‑range loudspeaker in a domestic space is that, from experience, I know amateurs already tend to completely overlook acoustic treatment even when they spend €10,000 on a pair of large monitors. So with compact €1,600 speakers that go below 30 Hz, I’m genuinely worried we’ll soon see a lot of them on the used market because people will buy them without realizing they’re beasts that require real integration work, and potentially acoustic investments far exceeding the price of the speakers themselves.
As for me, I haven’t made my decision yet since i should take care of my room first, and in any case, I generally avoid being an early adopter. It has saved me from some major disappointments more than once.
You are ignored. CongratsPot calling the kettle black methinks.
I was just pointing out that there might well be cause for concern at Genelec, Neumann etc. Primarily due to the value of these monitors within section of the market that they are aimed at.
Your continued sarcastic jibes just reinforce to me what come accross as daft childish arrogance.
I have done MLP measurements of my Orbits in my small room and they seem peaky in the bass (I can post measurements if people are interested). I agree that they may require EQ but I believe this is true of any speaker regardless of whether they are full range. I'm using subwoofers and Dirac ART with mine and I am going to do some sweeps in REW and different spl to check the distortion and where to set the support level.in Dirac.I’m very ambivalent about this speaker. On the one hand, I find the specs impressive, and on paper I’d be thrilled to get a full‑range monitor at this kind of price. But at the same time, I also know that to integrate these speakers properly into my room and actually gain more than I lose I’d have to spend money and invest many hours of research and work to make them a real upgrade for both my mixes and my casual listening (I do both in my home studio). In the end, even if they live up to their promises, I’ll probably end up choosing monitors that don’t go as low but are paired with multiple subs. (These monitors lose much of their appeal if they’re not used full‑range imo.)
The reason I’m warning about how difficult it is to integrate a full‑range loudspeaker in a domestic space is that, from experience, I know amateurs already tend to completely overlook acoustic treatment even when they spend €10,000 on a pair of large monitors. So with compact €1,600 speakers that go below 30 Hz, I’m genuinely worried we’ll soon see a lot of them on the used market because people will buy them without realizing they’re beasts that require real integration work, and potentially acoustic investments far exceeding the price of the speakers themselves.
As for me, I haven’t made my decision yet since i should take care of my room first, and in any case, I generally avoid being an early adopter. It has saved me from some major disappointments more than once.
Interesting point; it's really not. There is some of the fundamental 27.5Hz in there, but harmonics are dominant (>100% of fundamental).A0 of a grand piano is 27.5 hz (and mostly never played)
Well then they'll have to buy bigger speakers.Some might want more.
True, the Orbit 11 is obvjectively better (value) than a Genelec 8040 (895€) or something along those lines.Palmer can genuinely compete with about 99% of what Genelec sells the most.
Please do. Even though it highlights your room, it's still interesting.I have done MLP measurements of my Orbits in my small room and they seem peaky in the bass (I can post measurements if people are interested)
Which are decidedly subjective criteriaThat's not to even bring up things like reputation,... and cache.
According to their manual a lot of people who bought these will immediately die when attempting to use themKeep in mind: Palmer officially don't recommend this speaker for domestic use.
They do not.the speakers come complete with the means to address room mode peaks.
• Bass is hard to tame (at least in my room)
• Without the miniDSP with Dirac Live, I would have returned them
You mean I'm lucky they didn't kill me ... yet ?According to their manual a lot of people who bought these will immediately die when attempting to use them![]()