there is https://www.sonodyne.com/category/studio/studio-monitors/sm-series/sm-3300 and smaller models too)), the smaller models have aluminium die‑cast cabinet.in case I move to India
there is https://www.sonodyne.com/category/studio/studio-monitors/sm-series/sm-3300 and smaller models too)), the smaller models have aluminium die‑cast cabinet.in case I move to India
Is there a reason for that?Pretty sure the taper is there just to get the Coax drive unit nested as close as possible to the woofer magnets.
View attachment 512704
The closer the side woofers are to the midwoofer, the more effective the cardioid effect.Is there a reason for that?
I think choosing the right tool for the job is crucial, but in my view, you also need to know your equipment well and how it behaves in your room. I know people who have produced, mixed, and mastered songs using monitors costing a maximum of €300 per pair and no subwoofer (though they did use headphones to monitor low frequencies), and they've created a tremendous mix that translated well to various audio systems. My point is, better equipment helps, but it doesn't make you a better engineer; experience does. If you dedicate time and know your equipment well, you can compensate for its shortcomings. There are no shortcuts; sometimes you have to dedicate time to things, be aware of them, and learn. Technology might help you go faster in this regard. In any case, perfect, all-round solutions don't exist. I would choose the most neutral speaker possible within my budget and add a room correction system, good headphones for low frequencies, and the rest is up to you to learn how to use them and compensate. You shouldn't go wrong with either Neumann or Genelec, and as for Palmer I would wait for the data just in case.Yes Amir, the ability to mix is my concern,
But I have a different workflow since I compose produce mix and master all at the same time, so I mix master with a producer mentality which I love because I have full control of my sound.
So, I can produce on most speakers but to do surgical mixing decisions I need a better monitor for sure. One of my best mix/masters I ever made was on yamaha hs8 with a hs 8s sub in a well treated studio i had back in the day, so I'm guessing any of this great monitors Gens Nuemanns will make my work way better and easier..
I am very confident in my skills because I have 20+ years of experience... I am self taught, I know I can learn any speaker the question is which out of this are best for the price and are more portable in case I move to India or other country, also i need some low end monitoring because I make experimental electronic music playing with all kinds of frequencies but I don't want a sub woofer because is heavy for travelling...
Also I overthink a lot. So it is hard to make a decision without the ability to test.
I will also get some good planar headphones, and maybe VSX just to have it as reference.. I had Ananda Nano but I returned them because of a rattling noise at certain frequencies...
This is my situation.
I am watching your youtube now to learn more about sound and measurements..
Thanks.
The woofers as I am able to understand the design, does not contribute to the cardiod pattern in capacity, with the slots being the only manner in which the cardiod pattern is achieved. The crossover of the woofers being right at 250hz while also having the cardiod pattern diminish right around the same region based on the contour plots as provided by Palmer makes me think so. Maybe it's an aesthetic or sizing thing? I'm not too sure.......The closer the side woofers are to the midwoofer, the more effective the cardioid effect.
If you look at other cardioid monitors, you'll see the side woofers/vents are always pushed as close as possible to the front baffle.
Whichever monitor you choose, let me recommend using Dirac Live for room correction; it's truly impressive.Hi everyone!
I've been reading this forums for many years but only today i made an account and this is my first post.
I produce electronic music for over 20 years and I mix and master for about 3 years here in eastern europe
I am looking for new monitors for my studio, mostly for mixing and mastering complex electronic music of all kinds and would love some help from other mixing engineers.
My budget is around 1500 euros its about 1800 dollars. I live like a nomad so I always move around different countries, now i am on an island in Greece. My rooms change but i always make some acoustic treatment because sound is very important for me.
I auditioned Genelec 8030 next to kh120ii and to me genelec sounded good but strange with too much micro details in the mids and no bass so I liked kh120ii more.
I love the idea of ma1 calibration because i change houses often so calibration is a must i guess. The only thing that draws me back is the expensive sub plus the fact that i need a sub is a problem since i move a lot from country to country. I also looked at Footprint03 from Barefoot but people told me that the kh120ii are more precise for mixing..
Now Palmer Orbit 11 is here exactly when I am ready to purchase my first expensive monitors and they caught my eye. I love that they go deep and I won't need a sub etc.
My question is, does anyone know a better alternative for my situation? Is this all we have at this price range? genelec vs neumann
Thanks!
The passthrough latency I measured on my WiiM Mini (see here), WiiM Amp Pro and WiiM Amp Ultra was around 50-55ms.Do you know the latency?
I have considered using either that or a Wiim Pro for EQ purposes in the bass region, but it must also be low latency enough for dialogue in TV shows and movies. And also some gaming. The streaming function is a nice to have though.
I'm intrigued...why useless streaming tech?High latency
Useless streaming tech
No differential Line in/out
Useless display and volume knob
No control application for Windows/Mac
Response targets made for domestic environments
Uff die PalmeThomann has them in the demo as well
This makes logical sense to me and lends weight to idea of simply trusting independent high quality data like that provided by Amir and Erin.Mixing a song on a pair of speakers and then mixing the same song on another pair of speakers wouldn’t work, well, unless the mixing engineer has a total memory loss in the time between making those two mixes. The mixing engineer would have learned too much about the mix for his first attempt, which would give him a “head start” for his second attempt that could lead him to either a better mix, or even make it worse second guessing his previous decisions. The better mix of the two attempts will likely, in the end, be the better sounding mix on both pair of loudspeakers.![]()
Room correction isn't just about equalization. It involves timing adjustments and more. That has been mentioned multiple times in the forum. especially if you're adding a subwoofer.I have a WiiM it’s simply not built for a studio setting, if you have a small studio everything is your computer even the room correction .
I would guess that your DAW software has EQ on the output
In a large studio you have options everywhere with products I probably never heard of . There are “monitor controllers” and software I never had experience with .
My WiiM provides for my in my living room hifi . With “useless streaming” roon and squeezelite and built in EQ and analog and optical input so that I can have room correction EQ even when playing vinyl or CD . I use it’s digital out to a pair of LS60 and KC92’s .
This could also work with the palmer speakers for a small listening place . But that not their main purpose but in a small apartment these would compete with active burchart speakers in the same spot ?
That this speakers does not have their own room correction and other features are a choice well suited for pro and semi pro users as they already have this .
Forgot another useless streaming feature is that I naturally have room correction streaming from Spotify connect .I have a WiiM it’s simply not built for a studio setting, if you have a small studio everything is your computer even the room correction .
I would guess that your DAW software has EQ on the output
In a large studio you have options everywhere with products I probably never heard of . There are “monitor controllers” and software I never had experience with .
My WiiM provides for my in my living room hifi . With “useless streaming” roon and squeezelite and built in EQ and analog and optical input so that I can have room correction EQ even when playing vinyl or CD . I use it’s digital out to a pair of LS60 and KC92’s .
This could also work with the palmer speakers for a small listening place . But that not their main purpose but in a small apartment these would compete with active burchart speakers in the same spot ?
That this speakers does not have their own room correction and other features are a choice well suited for pro and semi pro users as they already have this .
Not sure why , they can adjust how they please, but yeah it already is No20 in the best selling chart for nearfield monitor on their site.They've just raised the price of Palmer Orbit in Thomann Spain from €777 to €785. How does Thomann work? Does the price increase based on interest and demand?
Dynamic and/or time-based pricing.They've just raised the price of Palmer Orbit in Thomann Spain from €777 to €785. How does Thomann work? Does the price increase based on interest and demand?
Like UBER: Rush hour? Rain? Booking using an iPhone?—> $$$Dynamic pricing.
Probably. I think they are all doing it now! Ain’t late stage capitalism great!Like UBER: Rush hour? Rain? Booking using an iPhone?—> $$$