OPPO BDP-95 Measurements (SACD)
Unfortunately, I can't create an SACD test disc, so I used the one from Denon.
To start with, when I first tested the SACD mode, I saw on the screen that it was displaying "PCM", but why? Because, and thanks to the very good documentation, if we set HDMI to output DSD data, then analog output will get a DSD to PCM digital conversion before being converted to analog. Go figure. So it is necessary to disable HDMI bitstream output to get the DSD data to be directly converted. The setup is this one (HDMI Off, SACD Output DSD, rest does not matter):
View attachment 477128
Back to the Denon Test SACD. It has some test files, and the main one is a sine tone 1kHz @-16dBSACD (=-16dBFS per Denon’s information):
View attachment 477127
The software shows 14.7bits ENOB, but since we play at -16dBFS, we need to add 16/6=2.7bits, so the true ENOB is 17.4bits, and it is dominated by distorsion. Note that I put the scale in dBFS instead of dBr, to better show the lower noise floor.
You can also see some noise shaping in audio band (that double noise-floor wave, from 2khz to 20kHz), which is the way Denon created their test file.
Let's play the same with DSD to PCM conversion before DA conversion:
View attachment 477129
Same performances but a little more low level distorsion.
And since I don't have much more to play with, I thought about an interesting comparison and, actually, this is why I have multiple -16dBFS test tones in my test CD

So, here is a 999.91Hz sine @-16dBFS, with shape dither, played form my test CD, not SACD:
View attachment 477130
Not so far, right? Of course, we see more shaped noise in audio band here because, as opposed to SACD, we are limited to 22kHz where to put the noise create by the noise shaper. But let's play a little more, and restrict the analysis from 20Hz to 6kHz:
View attachment 477132
What we see is that from 20Hz to 6kHz, we get the same performances from the Audio CD and the SACD. Of course this is cheating, but not so much since our ears degrade very much in performances above 6kHz, as per the CCIR-2k curve.
One more nasty/funny game? Yes, you don't ask for it, but you'll get it. Let's apply the CCIR-2k curve to the above, but this time, I let the computer include noise up to 20kHz, as usual:
View attachment 477133
The SACD wins, audiophiles are saved. But note we get "only" 1.5bit more than what can be achieved with the Audio CD and shape dither. So no, not 4 bits more as advertised by Sony (if I recall). We don't go from 16bits to 20bits,
non.
What else can I say. Oh yes, I know, let's talks ultrasonic noise

The below is the same 1kHz sine @-16dBFS played in native DSD mode or DSD to PCM:
View attachment 477135
Yes, the DSD native creates much more ultrasonic noise! This is because the PCM conversion comes with a digital filter of a frequency cut set at around 47kHz, so it attenuates everything beyond that point. What do you prefer?
OPPO BDP-95 Measurements (PCM 24bits - from USB drive)
Hmmn... I need a whiskey, and to turn on my old obsolete Sony R2R CD Player
Right, back to the high performing OPPO. We've not seen yet what this player is capable of. So let's use 24bits test files then...
This is the very standardized SINAD test of
@amirm, that is 1kHz sine @0dBFS (4Vrms output), at 44.1kHz, with FFT length of 32k and 4 averages (3 for Amir, but I can't do only 3):
View attachment 477138
A SINAD of 116.4dB would put this player in the "excellent" range of Amir's current dashboard. That's insane for a universal video player that is 15 years old!
And now we see more of that low random noise at the foot of the fundamental. It's to be ignored though, as per the AES mandated notch applied here.
And look at the total absence of power supply related noise, with a punishing 512k FFT length:
View attachment 477139
Nothing,
zip,
nada,
rien!!! Someone was mastering power supply at OPPO. Actually,
what you see is a PS that is silent below 0.0000008%, when running a full scale sine tone, can you believe it? Me not... I could run an FFT at 4M to try to find the bottom of it. But hey, that's laboratory level!
One more time, I am nothing else but impressed.
Jitter test you ask?
View attachment 477143
Nailed!!
Final conclusion - All things considered
Do I really need to write anything?
What a player! What an achiever! I'm speechless but I need to put myself together.
I am very happy I got the opportunity to test this player. And I am very pleased to report crazy good measurements. This was an insane multi-format player. What a beast. And only 999$ for satellite-class player, really? Oh boy.
You, owners of this beast, you're lucky!!!
Cherish it, listen to music with it, there are no format, no master that this player will fail.
What a device...
I hope you enjoyed this review!