Yes I think so too. Personally, I don’t crave the FIR so much.with good acoustic design, you can make a state of the art speaker just using normal biquads/PEQ. Your results will be entirely dependent on how well you do your polar measurements.
Yes I think so too. Personally, I don’t crave the FIR so much.with good acoustic design, you can make a state of the art speaker just using normal biquads/PEQ. Your results will be entirely dependent on how well you do your polar measurements.
Yes I think so too. Personally, I don’t crave the FIR so much.[/QUOTE][QUOTE="617, post: 607232, member: 6871] with good acoustic design, you can make a state of the art speaker just using normal biquads/PEQ. Your results will be entirely dependent on how well you do your polar measurements.
How flexible is HFD? Can you learn to build any crossover filter with it?
Also i noticed you have the 100W extra tweeter amp version, do they match the gain of that extra unit with the two 250W amps? I’m thinking of using FA123 too.
Just keep in mind that you need one fusion amp per channel. And you have to do the integration in a box yourself.
That's a reason tooI prefer miniDSP PWR-ICE simply because their software runs on macOS, and Hypex's doesn't AFAIK.
"Per channel" can be a little misleading wording. You need one amp per loudspeaker, be it 1, 2 or 3-way loudspeaker. If one wants more than 3-way, then more amps needed to be daisy chained.Oh, that's disappointing -- I suppose the idea is that you would bridge the two outputs? :/
"Per channel" can be a little misleading wording. You need one amp per loudspeaker, be it 1, 2 or 3-way loudspeaker. If one wants more than 3-way, then more amps needed to be daisy chained.
Hi!
I have been using these (two FA253) for 2 years now and have nothing to complain about (knocking on wood). They are rich in features and sounds really good. The software (HFD) may be a little weird for beginners, but it can be learned quickly. Feel free to ask if you are curious about something.
They are now used by some manufacturers to powering even high-end speakers. For example:
Lyravox loudspeakers
Oh, that's disappointing -- I suppose the idea is that you would bridge the two outputs? :/
I should have written "per speaker". It is obvious when these amps are used for active speakers, less with passive ones."Per channel" can be a little misleading wording. You need one amp per loudspeaker, be it 1, 2 or 3-way loudspeaker. If one wants more than 3-way, then more amps needed to be daisy chained.
I was told by a contact at Hypex that this generation would not be FIR capable, that new hardwire was required (and in development). That was a long time ago though, so I'm not sure if it's still the case. It is conceivable that they've managed to do it with the existing hardware, perhaps with fewer taps per sampling rate. Would be great if so.
There will be a new version in the near future. DSP has been upgraded from adau1450 to 1452. A larger pic controller was needed because there was no space left. And yes, Fir's on the input and output channels.
New version of DSP module or new version of complete plate amps?There will be a new version in the near future. DSP has been upgraded from adau1450 to 1452.
Are they going to make 4 channel plate amp? Might be a niche product but if they make it they can get all the orders from people wanting 4 channels.
Or a 3-way + 1-way for a budget friendly option, although that would put out less power than two 3-way.You can get two 3-way units and use them in BTL mode to get 4 drivers running.