NotInYourHead
Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2025
- Messages
- 90
- Likes
- 63
But it'd be pretty annoying I imagine, you expect 5532Well that's not too badI have used TL072 and they do a good job.
But it'd be pretty annoying I imagine, you expect 5532Well that's not too badI have used TL072 and they do a good job.
But it'd be pretty annoying I imagine, you expect 5532![]()
It matters more with exotic opamps. MUSES for example.
why even buy a Muses device, it won't sound any better
As I don't understand the argument here, here we go:I woud not. But, many opamps cost a lot more than that, and that's why there is this huge market out there. Of course, it is for those who believe that you can hear a difference between a modern opamp and an old 5532.
Well that's not too badI have used TL072 and they do a good job.
I once bought NJM5532 that was actually NJM4558.You'll be lucky if you get an actual NE5532. Lots of fakes I've seen are based on ancient opamps that are far inferior to the 5532 or not even audio opamps. Whatever has 8 legs is qualifed for "hi fever operational amplifer better than NE5532 OPA2064"![]()
What is "high quality"? You dont always need the best specs It depends on the application. Sometimes high bandwidth is not a good thing. Thats why there are dozens of different opamps on the market, many designed for specific applications like driving multiple video cables.But then instrumentation amplifier designs ( there are some in a pdf someone referenced above using the AD828) also need high quality, not just high bandwidth.
Those are not as good as the NE5534s for audio unless you need a high impedance input (jfet) . And may not be ideal in a circuit designed for lower input impedance OAs like the 5534s .Thing is, I just bought a tube of five TL072 opamps from them. Haven't even tried them yet. I guess they might be just pieces of black plastic that do nothing.
Indeed, I bought them for when I design a circuit that needs a jfet input.Those are not as good as the NE5534s for audio unless you need a high impedance input (jfet) . And may not be ideal in a circuit designed for lower input impedance OAs like the 5534s .
The application is an instrumentation amplifierWhat is "high quality"? You dont always need the best specs It depends on the application.
Again, it depends on the application. Analog devices makes over 50 OAs for instrumentation for a reason, there all designed for certain applications.The application is an instrumentation amplifier
"An instrumentation amplifier (sometimes shorthanded as in-amp or InAmp) is a precision differential amplifier that has been outfitted with input buffer amplifiers, which eliminate the need for input impedance matching and thus make the amplifier particularly suitable for use in measurement and test equipment. Additional characteristics include very low DC offset, low drift, low noise, very high open-loop gain, very high common-mode rejection ratio, and very high input impedances. Instrumentation amplifiers are used where great accuracy and stability of the circuit both short- and long-term are required."
Again, it depends on the application. Analog devices makes over 50 OAs for instrumentation for a reason, there all designed for certain applications.
Apendix B
The point is that the AD828 would not be used at all if it wasn't quite a good opamp. I am quite sure this is why it has found it's way into, and gained a reputation in, audiophile circles.
Which means nothing.and gained a reputation in, audiophile circles.
I am convinced the opa2211 I bought, based on physical appearance and the way they sound turned out to be real. I paid 11 Euro for 10 pieces, how can they sell it for so low?
my best sounding op amps to date and the cheapest too
Which means nothing.
Why would/could op-amps have 'a sound' ?