solderdude said:
Sure...
I think the goal of ASR is to post the technical side such as (basic) measurements and discuss these, but not the math and electronic design stuff for nerds/experts, so readers could benefit. Usually that does get discussed in the thread in some depth.
You can't win them all so I see no reason not to explain things anymore because a few of them don't (want to) get it.
You also can't please designers and electronic engineers.
You can't do a full suite of measurements under all conditions (including overload) in all situations either.
So reviews are limited in what they show.
Techie guys would prefer more measurements, others want more 'subjective babble', others want features explained/measured more or want different measurements.
It is what it is.
Thank you, all testing needs to be carefully considered, doesn't it?, otherwise it can and will be considered flawed (or even nonsense), won't it?
The Listening Room can be considered as a decaying/reproduction mechanism, by necessity, can't it? It will have a resulting Noise Floor, won't it? Once the decaying Note/Harmonics reach the Listening Rooms Noise Floor they will become changed/corrupted, that is combine with the Noise Floor and now become confused feedback/Listening GFB (and at this instance are unrecoverable and can be called, non-Pure, can't they?), won't they?
Ears (Audiblety)/Eyes (Holographic/3D)/Brain (Santa Claustrum and its connection to Consciousness or Cognitive control)/Body (especially low Frequency/s), are these also a part of the Test? It could be suggested that they (definitely) are, what, why? Ultimately, these are the Listener and Respectfully so, are asking that they enjoy what they are being presented with, as a Music/Musical/Alive/Real/Right experience…. this is reasonable, isn’t it? If yes, then People need to be considered, never Dismissed…. which is reasonable isn’t it?. If no, then it could be suggested that People are not the focus (desire/Intent), isn’t it? The Respect and Relationship/Context, with reference to the Listener, at some point needs to become objective Impressions with a repeatable Conclusion/s, doesn’t it? A Theoretical/Applied Scientific Process, isn’t it?
Passivation….
- Electronics….
- It could be suggested that Electronic Tech would not exist without Electrical Tech, Electrical Tech would not exist without Material Tech, and none of these would exist without Idea/s, would they? Especially in semiconductor device fabrication, "electronic passivation" refers to a process that reduces or eliminates surface electronic states (dangling bonds and defects) that can hinder device performance, typically by creating an effective, protective layer or modifying the surface.
- Further, re N/D (objective) measurement, is a Test to reveal if the Standing Wave Resonance/Ringing/Spikeing Diffusion/Compatable (Impedance/voltage/current) process/s has/have achieved/Helpful/beneficial and resulted in low/ultra low N/D. Note that it could/can be called a Diffuseing/Compatable/Peace Making process/s which indicate Stableness/Stablety/Compatablety, don’t they? Note not Peace Keeping which is by Force (not Passivation), isn’t it. It could be suggested to Dampen only if required, why? because Dampening can become Saturated/Saturation which becomes Hindering/detrimental and cause worse/much worse N/D (objective) measurement, can’t it?
- Further, re Ears (Audiblety)/Eyes (Holographic/3D)/Brain (Santa Claustrum and its connection to Consciousness or Cognitive control)/Body (especially low Frequency/s), are these also a part of the Test? It could be suggested that they (definitely) are, what, why? Ultimately, these are the Listener and Respectfully so, are asking that they enjoy what they are being presented with, as a Music/Musical/Alive/Real/Right experience…. this is reasonable, isn’t it? If yes, then People need to be considered, never Dismissed…. which is reasonable isn’t it?. If no, then it could be suggested that People are not the focus (desire/Intent), isn’t it? The Respect and Relationship/Context, with reference to Listener, at some point needs to become objective Impressions with a repeatable Conclusion/s, doesn’t it? A Theoretical/Applied Scientific Process, isn’t it?
- Electrical…. It could be suggested that Electrical Tech would not exist without Material Tech, and none of these would exist without Idea/s, would they? Electrical passivation, in the context of electronics and materials science (Theoretical/Applied Scientific Process), is a process that creates an effective, protective layer, often a thin oxide film, on a metal surface to reduce its reactivity and prevent corrosion, ensuring reliable/effective electrical connections and component longevity.
For consideration, Amplifyers amplify, Speakers transduce, Listener/Listening Room (together/combined) are Vibration/Reflection actuators/receivers/interpretors, so not a simplistic event/process, is it? The commonality is Noise Floor which is further complicated by Vibration/Reflection coupleing, without sufficient decoupleing/diffusion and dampening where required/necessary, isn't it? Note that as Resolution increases so also can these characteristics and is always best controlled/tightened (without loseing the higher Resolution) upstream to lessen/manage the requirement/s downstream, isn’t it?
Electronics are usually dead flat between 100Hz and 10kHz so matching at any of those frequencies will be fine as long as the used meter is suited for the used frequency.
Thank you, but if they are not matched below 100Hz, wouldn't the resulting (bass frequency/s) decay change the presentation, between 100Hz and 10kHz, even though (initially) matched between 100Hz and 10kHz?
