• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Onkyo TX-RZ30 AV Receiver Review

Rate this AVR:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 90 47.9%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 79 42.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 18 9.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 1 0.5%

  • Total voters
    188

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
50,647
Likes
302,707
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2 home theater AVR. It was kindly drop shipped to me by a member and costs US $1,100.
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC Dolby Atmos AVR review.jpg

As you can see, we have the same cookie-cutter design with no attempt at differentiation. As if to copy that into controls, the volume knob is the same stiff one everyone else implements. A tiny of row of black buttons which are kind of hard to push under the display given some level of control.

Back panel shows input types dating decades back:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC Dolby Atmos AVR HDMI back panel review.jpg

I wonder where they are finding the silicon to decode and digitize component video. We even have AM and FM inputs and antenna!

Happy to see the pre-amp out although sadly, there is no way to turn off the internal amplifiers.

I was pleased to see extruded aluminum for the heat sink rather than spring steel. A large fan which never came on sits between it and the top of the unit. In use, the unit never felt too warm.

The transformer seems rather small which explains the very manageable weight.

Before testing, I performed an online update to latest firmware. I attempted to use the WebUI but it is only for setup with control systems rather than interacting with the unit.

Onkyo TX-RZ30 Measurements
As usual, I started with using the pre-out to determine the fidelity of the internal DAC. It was quite challenging to get proper output until I realized in 2 channel mode, by default it turns on some kind of processing. Once I defeated that using Pure Direct (Stere, etc. works as well), I got more reasonable results:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC Measurement.png

Nice to see 2 volts output but performance disappoints, represents that of a 16 bit device:
Best AV Receiver Review Stereo 2026.png

I guess landing in the middle of a bunch of lackluster results is cause for some relief.

As with other AVRs, turning up the volume will increase noise:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC THD vs Level Measurement.png

But we also get higher output voltage of nearly 4 volt which is very good for unbalanced RCA. You can drive just about any power amp to its peak power without penalty.

Multitone performance is good:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC Multitone Measurement.png


Jitter is not:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC Jitter Measurement.png


IMD response shows that we are still so far behind desktop products:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC IMD Measurement.png


Ditto for noise:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC DNR Measurement.png


The filter is the standard we expect as well as its less than ideal attenuation:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC filter Measurement.png


Which is likely the cause of poor wideband response:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver DAC THD vs Freq Measurement.png


Switching to the amplifier, measurements with HDMI and analog were basically the same:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier HDMI Measurement.png

TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier RCA Measurement.png


For ease of testing and comparison, I stayed with analog for the rest of the tests:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier RCA frequency response Measurement.png

We see that the amplifier implementation is good.

I was surprised how quickly the amp clipped:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier RCA SNR Measurement.png


Figuring out why when I ran my power sweep:
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier RCA Power 4 ohm Measurement.png


As with other Onkyo and Pioneer AVRs, any attempt to push the amplifier will cause it to go into a lower power mode. This can not be fixed with a power button cycle. You must disconnect the AC cable or it will continue to do so until end of time.
TX-RZ30 9 2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver Amplifier RCA Power 8 ohm Measurement.png


As a result of this, I can't run any of my power rating tests as they rely on finding the clipping point.

Conclusions
What can I say. Nothing all that good. The power limiting alone is enough to make my blood boil. Do their product marketing people know what the engineering has done? Do they care? Even ignoring that, performance is average at best for a brand that thinks it is better than average.

OK, I am happy about the high output voltage drive from the pre-out without distorting.

I can't recommend the Onkyo TX-RZ30.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
The power limiting feature is a complete deal breaker. For some reason this looks like an older receiver. Does not do Auro 3D. Also looks like it's set for a 7.1.2 configuration with two back surround and only two height. I think it would be vastly preferable to at least have a way to make the two back channels be rear height channels instead, so you could have a 5.1.4 layout.

Very fine review, Amir. So many of these boxes are hugely disappointing, and this one is no exception. It's only priced right if it performs right.
 
Last edited:
Premium Audio Corporation acquired Onkyo in September 2021.

The Onkyo TX-RZ30 AVR was released in September 2024.

I am unfamiliar with how long it took to develop the TX-RZ30.

I am disappointed to read the TX-RZ30 retains the measured amplifier performance of earlier gear from this manufacturer.

Thank you to the member for arranging with Amir for this AVR/AVP to be measured.

Adorama and Electronics Expo currently are selling this AVR/AVP for about $800.
 
The power limiting feature is a complete deal breaker. For some reason this looks like an older receiver. Does not do Auro 3D. Also looks like it's set for a 7.1.2 configuration with two back surround and only two height. I think it would be vastly preferable to at least have a way to make the two back channels be rear height channels instead, so you could have a 5.1.4 layout.

Very fine review, Amir. So many of these boxes are hugely disappointing, and this one is no exception. It's only priced right if it performs right.

The speaker terminals with the markings 'Surround Back' also include markings below the terminals for 'Height 2'.

I do not know but I assume these speaker terminals can be set to drive rear Atmos speakers.
 
Thank you @amirm

Happy to see the pre-amp out although sadly, there is no way to turn off the internal amplifiers.

I looked at this some time back and I was under impression that there is a preamp mode that disables the power amplifier section and only lets preouts function.
Something like this:

1780116962671.png
 
I looked at this some time back and I was under impression that there is a preamp mode that disables the power amplifier section and only lets preouts function.
Something like this:
I went through every menu and there is nothing there that I could see.
 
any attempt to push the amplifier will cause it to go into a lower power mode. This can not be fixed with a power button cycle. You must disconnect the AC cable or it will continue to do so until end of time.
This seems pretty bad... how would you know, is there an indicator or something?
 
As with other Onkyo and Pioneer AVRs, any attempt to push the amplifier will cause it to go into a lower power mode. This can not be fixed with a power button cycle. You must disconnect the AC cable or it will continue to do so until end of time.
Another one... :facepalm:

Thanks for the testing, hopefully some will see this review and steer clear.

Pic;

1780121258813.png



JSmith
 
This seems pretty bad... how would you know, is there an indicator or something?
No indicator. You can only see it by measuring and trying power cycling vs AC cord cycling. This is now the 4th AVR with this problem so I know it quite well.
 
I voted “Fine,” because it is. I’d have little compunctions about using this for an AVR, assuming it met my power needs without triggering limp mode.

It’s $1K, reportedly selling for $800 new. It’s a 9.2ch Atmos processor with Dirac full bandwidth license included. It has pre-outs. The DAC is far from SOTU but would be transparent for me and I imagine most anyone. The amplification is mediocre but again I’ve tested my sensitivity to distortion and this would be just fine. That is an *awful* lot of value. Take the savings and put it towards your speaker budget, and you’ll likely get a much better sounding system out of it.

Component video though. What a laugh.
 
No indicator. You can only see it by measuring and trying power cycling vs AC cord cycling. This is now the 4th AVR with this problem so I know it quite well.

4.5 AVR's if you count a 're-measurement' of one model..........

I hope a member arranges soon to drop-ship one of the new Denon AVR's to Amir for measurement - in hopes it displays performance similar to or better than the Denon AVR-X3600H AVR.
 
I voted “Fine,” because it is. I’d have little compunctions about using this for an AVR, assuming it met my power needs without triggering limp mode.

It’s $1K, reportedly selling for $800 new. It’s a 9.2ch Atmos processor with Dirac full bandwidth license included. It has pre-outs. The DAC is far from SOTU but would be transparent for me and I imagine most anyone. The amplification is mediocre but again I’ve tested my sensitivity to distortion and this would be just fine. That is an *awful* lot of value. Take the savings and put it towards your speaker budget, and you’ll likely get a much better sounding system out of it.

Component video though. What a laugh.

Agreed.

I am using a similar Pioneer Elite '505' as an AVP - with external amplification that includes some channels of the analog 7-channel input of an Onkyo '805' AVR :)


AFAIK, Gentex has not yet confirmed they will produce the 'concept' AVR's they displayed at CES 2026.

Until then, I wonder if Gentex is committed to providing support beyond the warranty period for the Onkyo TX-RZ30.


Given the arrival of the new Denon AVR-X3900H,

I would consider instead looking for a clearance price on a Denon '3800' AVR and waiting for a sale at Dirac to acquire licensing.
 
I voted “Fine,” because it is. I’d have little compunctions about using this for an AVR, assuming it met my power needs without triggering limp mode.

It’s $1K, reportedly selling for $800 new. It’s a 9.2ch Atmos processor with Dirac full bandwidth license included. It has pre-outs. The DAC is far from SOTU but would be transparent for me and I imagine most anyone. The amplification is mediocre but again I’ve tested my sensitivity to distortion and this would be just fine. That is an *awful* lot of value. Take the savings and put it towards your speaker budget, and you’ll likely get a much better sounding system out of it.

Component video though. What a laugh.
Haha, I mean I DO agree, but there will always be a few that still want that feature. Being serious, legacy devices are somewhat still used, and they will cry "$1,200 bucks and I can't hook up my XYZ device!!"
 
Haha, I mean I DO agree, but there will always be a few that still want that feature. Being serious, legacy devices are somewhat still used, and they will cry "$1,200 bucks and I can't hook up my XYZ device!!"
I have used the component video for a multi disc DVD player for TV series. A quick check showed there were a few multi disc Sony's with HDMI outs. What would be silly is if it had Super video outs.
 
Back
Top Bottom