Very preliminary news has Onkyo ready to enter the Dirac ART fold w/intro of new products during CES. Products won't be available until 2027!
Too little too late?
Too little too late?
Deep discounts on PAC products can generally be had but typically not in its first year of existence. Based on that, a "great deal" won't happen until 2028?It would be great news if a reasonably priced preamp/processor with advanced room correction became available. With so little competition in the middle and lower price segments of the market, these new products could be a real boost for A/V enthusiasts.
I hope not.Very preliminary news has Onkyo ready to enter the Dirac ART fold w/intro of new products during CES. Products won't be available until 2027!
Too little too late?
DLBC pricing for PAC is the same for D&M. I would imagine the pricing for ART would be the same as well!Better late than never. Great to hear that we might have more choice in the future.
I certainly hope that they will design new gen of products with great thought and view of the current market and features. My hope is that D&M will also have a new and improved line by 2027 and that PAC will bring their best to the game to compete with them.
Will be interesting to see if PAC can do better Bass Control and ART pricing than D&M.
I agree there's a lot of marketing speak/fluff and not a lot of detail (sure to come in the next few days of CES). What worries me is if Dirac ART will only be pushed to AV Processors and not their AVR lineup.I hope not.
I don't know whether to be encouraged or discouraged by the phrases 'conceptual components' and 'proposed architecture' in the link.
It leaves me uncertain whether 'Gentex' - the owner of Onkyo, is committed to allocating capital investment to home theater or not.
It leaves me uncertain whether 'Gentex' - the owner of Onkyo, is committed to allocating capital investment to home theater or not.
I don't understand either of these sentiments at all. From the announcement page:I agree there's a lot of marketing speak/fluff and not a lot of detail (sure to come in the next few days of CES). What worries me is if Dirac ART will only be pushed to AV Processors and not their AVR lineup.
Nothing there says or implies "not investing in home theater" or "Dirac ART will only be available on the AVPs but not AVRs".NEXT-GENERATION HOME THEATER CONCEPTS
Looking further ahead, Onkyo positions CES 2026 to tease its vision for the future of home entertainment with a new generation of TX and RZ Series AV processors, amplifiers, and all-in-one receivers. These conceptual components are engineered for monstrous multi-channel and multi-room performance, supporting up to 15-channel processing with 11-channel power in the proposed architecture. The direction underscores Onkyo’s commitment to leading as the global heartbeat of home entertainment—where cinematic immersion, musical fidelity, and seamless connectivity converge.
The next-generation concepts incorporate cutting-edge technology integrations, including THX® Certified Dominus™, Dirac ART Available, and Auracast™, while continuing Onkyo’s dedication to Dirac Live room-correction technology. Designed to deliver unprecedented multi-channel power, expansive processing capabilities, and seamless multi-room performance, these innovations position Onkyo at the forefront of the next era in home theater. The company expects these breakthrough home entertainment products to arrive in 2027.
Just a matter of taste. Definitively beats the pothole that I learned to live with.I don't understand either of these sentiments at all. From the announcement page:
Nothing there says or implies "not investing in home theater" or "Dirac ART will only be available on the AVPs but not AVRs".
I do dislike this:
View attachment 502219
Next generation AV products, but:
1) Still a giant black box. This is 2026, excellent SMPS/class D options exist, why are they still designing things like this.
2) They put in a nice display instead of the same dot-matrix things they've been using since the 90s, cool. Except they have this gigantic faceplate and even put in a big black piece of glass/plastic to give the impression of a big display, but the actual screen is this tiny thing maybe an inch or two high and two or three inches wide in the middle of the big black piece of glass/plastic. Seriously, wtf. Who is designing these things.
Well, my point is that they should do better than D&M. Distinguishing factor being PAC receivers will already come with DL (probably limited), which does not give you multiple progression options as D&M. Audy is what it is but still a force, especially with all the @OCA enhancements that are all free of charge.DLBC pricing for PAC is the same for D&M. I would imagine the pricing for ART would be the same as well!
Agreed that this is a design to hide instead of put on display - especially with such a 'display' - give me a tablet to control that device.I don't understand either of these sentiments at all. From the announcement page:
Nothing there says or implies "not investing in home theater" or "Dirac ART will only be available on the AVPs but not AVRs".
I do dislike this:
View attachment 502219
Next generation AV products, but:
1) Still a giant black box. This is 2026, excellent SMPS/class D options exist, why are they still designing things like this.
2) They put in a nice display instead of the same dot-matrix things they've been using since the 90s, cool. Except they have this gigantic faceplate and even put in a big black piece of glass/plastic to give the impression of a big display, but the actual screen is this tiny thing maybe an inch or two high and two or three inches wide in the middle of the big black piece of glass/plastic. Seriously, wtf. Who is designing these things.
I'd love to consult for them - if they are following the thread they can PM anytime.Agreed that this is a design to hide instead of put on display - especially with such a 'display' - give me a tablet to control that device.
My speculation is Gentex is using the phrases 'conceptual components' and 'proposed architecture' to signal they are consulting with potential retail partners as to the features to offer to be competitive in the home theater market.
Well yes, the Marantz porthole display was obviously the result of hiring some deranged boating enthusiast for their industrial design.Just a matter of taste. Definitively beats the pothole that I learned to live with.
Now when we speak of it, cloud AVR could be cheaper and thus apparently better, and not need for display or design at all.Well yes, the Marantz porthole display was obviously the result of hiring some deranged boating enthusiast for their industrial design.
I'm unclear how you could get amplification, decoding, video switching, etc. working in the cloud. And regardless, I'd still want some way to see what I'm doing locally. Having to load up an app or web interface every time I want to change volume, inputs, or other settings does not sound like a good experience to me.Now when we speak of it, cloud AVR could be cheaper and thus apparently better, and not need for display or design at all.
It's the future though. There would still be a box in your room, but the processing would be in the cloud.I'm unclear how you could get amplification, decoding, video switching, etc. working in the cloud. And regardless, I'd still want some way to see what I'm doing locally. Having to load up an app or web interface every time I want to change volume, inputs, or other settings does not sound like a good experience to me.
Latency.Nothing would change with "virtual processing".
Have 10ms latency on my mid-range wi-fi. Compared to latency of my system overall that is nothing. Buffering the content would eliminate any real concerns.Latency.
The processing isn't the bit that makes it expensive or big, asides from licensing which wouldn't change with a "cloud" solution except that maybe you'd be paying yet another subscription, so I don't see the benefit.