Robin L
Master Contributor
I'm not a native English speaker, but don't You have any other words than audiophile to describe a person who claims to hear something that others can't hear?
I'm not a native English speaker, but don't You have any other words than audiophile to describe a person who claims to hear something that others can't hear?
And as with any topic, discussion of differences in opinions can only work when both/all parties are working from the same foundation of facts.It is normal and perfectly fine for people to have differences in perspectives, perceptions and opinions. The difficult part is expressing and receiving conflicting ideas respectfully. Engaging in healthy, productive discussion consumes precious time and energy and depending on who it is with, can be a total waste of both.
It reminds me our UFO thread but humorless.
One who knows something, doesn't believe in it any more. It's mutually exclusive.Then it's really only for the newly accepted belief. Don't believe; know!
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. DickOne who knows something, doesn't believe in it any more. It's mutually exclusive.
Exactly. Reality "has been there before" anyway, the real reality, that is, not believed reality."Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
Yes and no. In a debate you'll never convince someone with your arguments if they think their arguments are valid. The first step is always to destroy methodically their arguments, make it clear their knowledge is failing them, you sort of make room in their heads before you expose yours.One cannot convince people that are already convinced no matter what arguments are used.
Debates are pretty much never about persuading ones opponent -- they're about persuading persuadable folks, if there are any, among those in attendance.Yes and no. In a debate you'll never convince someone with your arguments if they think their arguments are valid. The first step is always to destroy methodically their arguments, make it clear their knowledge is failing them, you sort of make room in their heads before you expose yours.
I was wondering if it was our recently discouraged commenter “Imadch”, who went away mad (and confused) but the style doesn’t match.The style of writing of Summit's posts reminds me of AI
I tried to bring a blind-test challenge to Audiogon ages ago. The moderator deleted my posts repeatedly and I was subjected to the same wall of nonsense Amir is battling. I haven’t participated since. In particular the “I’ve listed to/owned a lot of expensive equipment” justification for expertise is sort of worshipped over there. There was a guy *bragging* about how many ridiculously expensive amplifiers he’d owned, and this gave him huge street cred in their “sighted listening is knowing” world.I bet everyone on that other site are Stereophile subscribers LOL! Full disclosure I am as well but mostly for the entertainment value!
at least they're not playing a 40 kHz tone and asking you to click if you hear anything...These Audiogon guys are really dishonest about their super human hearing abilities, since I just noticed that when you access that forum you need to confirm:
View attachment 477850
Even better, a null comparison file for cheap and expensive cables/DACsat least they're not playing a 40 kHz tone and asking you to click if you hear anything...