About format
Sorry to say I still see 0 interest to publish a 15 minutes video, just to demonstrate a point that a 5 seconds video (to show that the noise doesn't follow music) and 5 paragraphs of text with pictures would have demonstrated more efficiently.
It's just wasting your time and my time.
Too bad, since the content is interesting.
Just my point of view, of course.
But comparing the number of views for the video review and its text equivalent seems to indicate I'm not the only one.
I disagree. @amirm obviosuly enjoyed making this video, for the reasons I can guess and which I symphatize with, as I feel the same toward snake oil vendors. It is up to him to decide how much of his time he will invest in making his video, on his web site, using his money and his equipment etc. I hope you get the point?
Regarding your, and anybody else's time, including mine, it is our decision how we choose to use it. So either we watch the entire video, or watch only 10 seconds with the frequency distribution graph or not watch video at all, we should still respect the man who is offering content on this web site for free, spending his own time and money on that, no matter whether we like the content or not.
If this video has been charged to you on a pay-per-minute basis I would understand your point, but as it was offered for free, from that perspective your post seems ungratefull/unpolite to me.
Just my point of view, of course.
Last edited: