• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

O-NOORUS D3 - TPA3255 Amp with ES9023P DAC, NJW1194 Vol Control with remote

The USB output is an analog signal
Are you sure that the USB is an analog output and not a digital input?
According to the specifications, USB is an input and supports a sample rate of 32bit 385kHz, which would mean that it is a digital input.

D3 spec.jpg
 
Are you sure that the USB is an analog output and not a digital input?
According to the specifications, USB is an input and supports a sample rate of 32bit 385kHz, which would mean that it is a digital input.

View attachment 319471
Digital input, internally decoded into analog output by ALC4050.
 
this thing really needs a circuit diagram but even with the info given we can make an educated guess on what the hell is going on in here...

  • The advantage of this amplifier is to provide USB-C input with Realtek ALC4050 audio driver, support OTG audio, 32bit 384Khz.
USB-C is 32/384 thru the ALC4050... motherboard audio quality???

  • Bluetooth, coaxial and optical fiber signals are converted and output by CS8422 to D/A ES9023P for decoding.
CS8422 sends the above to the ESS9023 which is fine as they should all be under 24/192 anyway

  • The NJW1194 chip not only controls the output volume, but also controls the gain within +/-10db range of treble and bass.
this does all the vol. ctrl. in digital domain, common device in SMSL Topping stuff with more resolution than this device has

  • The Qualcomm 32-bit QCC3034 Bluetooth receiver chip lets you use multiple audio sources wirelessly and utilizes high-definition Bluetooth transmission codecs such as aptX and aptX HD.
QCA3034 does NOT have a dac inside... it is passed thru to the ESS9023

so overall to me this device is a mess of a design... I dont expect greatness but it should be ok for intended China market use.
 
this thing really needs a circuit diagram but even with the info given we can make an educated guess on what the hell is going on in here...

  • The advantage of this amplifier is to provide USB-C input with Realtek ALC4050 audio driver, support OTG audio, 32bit 384Khz.
USB-C is 32/384 thru the ALC4050... motherboard audio quality???

  • Bluetooth, coaxial and optical fiber signals are converted and output by CS8422 to D/A ES9023P for decoding.
CS8422 sends the above to the ESS9023 which is fine as they should all be under 24/192 anyway

  • The NJW1194 chip not only controls the output volume, but also controls the gain within +/-10db range of treble and bass.
this does all the vol. ctrl. in digital domain, common device in SMSL Topping stuff with more resolution than this device has

  • The Qualcomm 32-bit QCC3034 Bluetooth receiver chip lets you use multiple audio sources wirelessly and utilizes high-definition Bluetooth transmission codecs such as aptX and aptX HD.
QCA3034 does NOT have a dac inside... it is passed thru to the ESS9023

so overall to me this device is a mess of a design... I dont expect greatness but it should be ok for intended China market use.
What suggestions do you have for changing the design?
 
USB input with X-mos chip that forwards digital signal to DAC chip and some better DAC chip to use.
unfortunately we are bound down the road as paved by Topping SMSL

there's a lot to be said for simplicity and the latest processors

if you want the latest you pay a high price

XU316 + ESS9039 or AKM449x is the high end stuff... also the QCA5000 series

IMO this design only makes sense if you can get these older processors cheap... and one might ask why its so complicated???

eg. I have an SMSL budget dac with the ESS9023... its ok for what it is

you would have a hard time convincing people here the ALC4050 is a good idea in a desktop amp

BUT I can forgive at lot at $120 and I do like the case design etc. Like if we have a boring design like the SMSL AL200 then... its just like all the other competant boxes.
 
unfortunately we are bound down the road as paved by Topping SMSL

there's a lot to be said for simplicity and the latest processors

if you want the latest you pay a high price

XU316 + ESS9039 or AKM449x is the high end stuff... also the QCA5000 series

IMO this design only makes sense if you can get these older processors cheap... and one might ask why its so complicated???

eg. I have an SMSL budget dac with the ESS9023... its ok for what it is

you would have a hard time convincing people here the ALC4050 is a good idea in a desktop amp

BUT I can forgive at lot at $120 and I do like the case design etc. Like if we have a boring design like the SMSL AL200 then... its just like all the other competant boxes.
O-NOORUS D2 will be a model using high-end chips.
D3 only caters to products at different price points;
D1 is a pure power amplifier, but it has three modes.
They have the same casing, with slightly different front panels.
 
i was about to say

they are using the same case with less drilled holes for different products

ie. D1 D2 D3

see the screen printing on the left upper side from the back
 
I have been using the O-Noorus D3 for a couple of weeks now, so I'm happy to provide a few, preliminary, comments.

For context, my setup is a desktop (nearfield) application running Q Acoustics 2010s and a Wharfedale SW150 sub in a large office. The source is an Amazon Music subscription streamed via a near new Dell Inspiron laptop.

I was using the Fosi Audio BT20A in this modest setup, but was concerned that the internal DAC of the Dell was, perhaps, letting down the side. I was looking at introducing an external DAC, but in my search, stumbled upon the D3. Internal DAC, red case, TPA 3255, LED display, remote control, included PSU, $170AUD - why not?

I have the D3 connected via the USB input. (I tried the 3.5mm (which utilises the Dell's Dac) but preferred the sound signature using the D3's DAC).

In short, I like the D3 a great deal. I think it looks great and love the LCD screen (the main reason I bought it TBH).

The execution of this little amp, from a functionality perspective, is excellent in my opinion. Mine shipped without an instruction manual, but it was very simple to work out how everything works. Very intuitive in my experience.

The LCD screen offers 4 levels of brightness and 9 different colours. The remote control does on/off and mute, and adjusts volume, bass and treble, and input, but not LCD colour or brightness.

The sub out is variable, but sends a full range signal (no low pass filter) to the sub. It continues to send output to the subwoofer even when the unit is off.

The only analogue input is a 3.5mm jack.

I have absolutely no complaints about the sound quality. The QA 2010s are not the last word in refinement and can get a little sharp, but the D3 sounds better to me than the Fosi in the above set up (possibly due to the different inputs (DACs) utilised) particularly in the higher frequencies; less wince inducing. One of my tests is vocals (the spoken voice) on you tube. Some class D amps (including the Fosi) can make you tube vocals sound harsh and brittle. The D3 doesn't (as much). Not perfect, but no worse than my Marantz NR1405.

In my setup, the D3 sounds better, to me, than the Fosi Audio BT20A Pro. Not by a lot, and possibly only because of my Dell's DAC when running the Fosi.

For reference I also run a variety of Tannoy, Monitor Audio and Q Acoustic speakers with Marantz, NAD, Aiyima, Nobsound (Douk Audio) and Fosi Audio amplifiers. None of which could be considered high end, so my impressions of this amplifier should be considered in this context.
 
I was using the Fosi Audio BT20A in this modest setup, but was concerned that the internal DAC of the Dell was, perhaps, letting down the side.... - why not?

The D3 uses the Realtek ALC4050 DAC for the USB input. The ALC4050 DAC is commonly found in laptops and PC motherboards (and £10 dongles)... e.g. https://www.dell.com/support/home/en-us/drivers/driversdetails?driverid=dn3k4

You may well be using the same model DAC chip in the D3 as in your laptop.

And welcome to ASR :)
 
The D3 uses the Realtek ALC4050 DAC for the USB input. The ALC4050 DAC is commonly found in laptops and PC motherboards (and £10 dongles)... e.g. https://www.dell.com/support/home/en-us/drivers/driversdetails?driverid=dn3k4

You may well be using the same model DAC chip in the D3 as in your laptop.

And welcome to ASR :)
Very true.

Sounds different to me though. Some may say better, some worse. Me, I prefer the sound via the D3's DAC.

My system is very modest. More revealing systems may show up the limitations of the budget infrastructure employed by the D3. I'm just satisfied that the D3, in my system, makes me happy.

And thank you. Glad to be aboard.
 
Back
Top Bottom