• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

O-Noorus D3 Pro Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 2.3%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 44 25.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 116 67.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 9 5.2%

  • Total voters
    173

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,376
Likes
292,530
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the O-Noorus D3 Pro stereo class D desktop amplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $249 with the included 48 volt@5 amp power supply.
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp review.jpg

As you see, the D3 Pro has a colorful display. I like the large volume indicator whose color and brightness you can change. A remote control is provided which necessitates a digitally controlled analog volume control (this can have a hit on performance):
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp GAN Power Supply review.jpg

Connectivity is extensive for this class supporting a number of different inputs including HDMI ARC. The speaker terminals are pretty close together and small. While they fit my locking banana plugs, it was a tight fit.

Back to remote, there is supposed to be a mode to turn off the volume control but I could not figure out how to get into that with either the remote or front panel. So for all the testing, the volume adjustment was in the loop.

PFFB is implemented which should lower or eliminate load dependency.

Maybe due to inclusion of all of this functionality, the amp runs warm even when sitting idle. While it didn't burn my hand, at the end of the testing, the case was toasty.

O-Noorus D3 Pro Amplifier Measurement
I adjusted the volume control to 74 which gave me 25 dB of gain. RCA input and digital Coax produced identical results indicating the amp is the limitation:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp measurement.png


This is very respectable performance:
best desktop amplifier HDMI review 2026.png

best desktop amplifier HDMI review zoomed 2026.png


As is noise:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp SNR measurement.png


PFFB implementation is good but not perfect:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp frequency response measurement.png


Crosstalk though, is near perfect:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp crosstalk measurement.png


Multitone and 19+20 KHz intermodulation tests both show the weakness of this class with rising distortion at higher frequencies:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Multitone measurement.png

O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp 19 20 kHz intermodulation distortion measure...png


The amp is pretty powerful for its size:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Power 4 ohm measurement.png

O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Max Peak burst Power 4 ohm measurement.png

most powerful desktop amplifier bookshelf speaker review 2026.png

O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Power 8 ohm measurement.png


Since the amp runs pretty warm as is, I didn't want to push it at 2 ohm in stereo. But did test one channel:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Power 2 ohm measurement.png


We see much rising distortion at higher frequencies yet again in our multiple sweeps:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp Power 4 ohm vs frequency vs distortion measu...png


The amp is rather noisy on power up:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp power on off noise measurement.png


But stable:
O-noorus D3 Pro Stereo Class D PFFB amplifier amp warm up measurement.png


Conclusions
Boy, we sure have so many offerings in this IC based class-D desktop amplifier. Nice to see competent implementations such as this D3 Pro. Compare to much of its competition, it wins on comprehensive set of inputs and remote control. Measured performance is very good for class but for the price, I wish the PFFB was better.

I am going to recommend the O-Noorus D3 Pro stereo integrated amplifier.
-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

TPA3255 Amplifier and AK4493S Decoder with HDMI ARC Bluetooth5.4 USB Optical Coaxial RCA input

Specifications:​

Model: D3 PRO
THD: ≤ 0.003%
SNR: ≥ 93dB@5W 4Ω, 116dB@110W 4Ω
SINAD: 92dB@5W 4Ω, 86dB @110W 4Ω
Input Mode: HDMI ARC / BLUETOOTH/ USB /Optical/ Coaxial /RCA/ U Disk
Power Supply: 36V5A/48V5A/NO POWER
Working Voltage: 24V~ 48V
Terminating Impedance: 2-8Ω
Frequency Range: 20Hz - 20kHz
Output Mode: Passive speakers/Active subwoofer /RCA Output​

This is a TPA3255 amplifier, and it is also an AK4493 decoder.

-RCA input/output multiplexing: RCA is not set to input status, but converted to pre-amplifier output (audio source sharing mode).​

-There are four working modes:​

Decoding mode: D-F mode, D-B mode;​

Amplifier mode: A-F mode, A-B mode.​

 
Interesting little amp.
Another nice "swiss knife" for desktop use., thanks for the review!
 
In the review, there is this statement:

“A remote control is provided, which necessitates a digitally controlled analog volume control (this can have a hit on performance).”

I am uncertain about this point. A digitally controlled analog volume control is required for analog inputs, independent of the inclusion of a remote control. In DAC mode, this IC could be bypassed, allowing the internal digital volume of the DAC to be controlled by the CPU, similar to how the CPU controls the digitally controlled analog volume control for analog inputs.
 
analog inputs
That's a good point.
This seems to have either analog input OR preamp (DAC+volume, I suppose) output.

So I wonder how it would perform just as DAC/Preamp or just as analog amplifier.

The DAC being AK4493, it's quite unlikely it would be a limiting factor, though, so I expect the former to be quite good and the later to be as above.

And, anyway, any of those side use cases would miss the main benefit of this device: the one-box amp with multiple inputs and remote...
 
Last edited:
A digitally controlled analog volume control is required for analog inputs, independent of the inclusion of a remote control.
??? You can implement analog volume control using a pot and a buffer (IC or transistor). This can't be controlled using a remote unless you make it either motorized, or us a volume control IC. The former costs more money. The latter costs you SNR and distortion.
 
Dominant 3rd harmonic combined with low-ish SINAD won't sound nice at all.

Also I wish they'd stop using these weak dc barrel jacks and just replace it with a screw on type connector or whatever Lenovo uses that doesn't rotate in the socket.
 
I received a sample as a tester. It's great to finally see the ASR test, thanks Amir! The performance is rather disappointing considering the tough competition from other TPA325X...

You can't tell from the pictures, but its size is really small when you see it in real life.

The power output seems quite good with a 48V/5A power supply.
 
It's great to finally see the ASR test, thanks Amir!
You reminded me in the Topping thread. :) Saw the box and realized it had been sitting here a few months so tested it....
 
The hand soldering on those socketed op amps is... something o_O
 
You reminded me in the Topping thread. :) Saw the box and realized it had been sitting here a few months so tested it....
I do appreciate many thx again )))
 
??? You can implement analog volume control using a pot and a buffer (IC or transistor). This can't be controlled using a remote unless you make it either motorized, or us a volume control IC. The former costs more money. The latter costs you SNR and distortion.
I have the D1 which seems to be similar in this regard (just missing all the DAC stuff); in "Bypass Mode" it uses the pot for volume control, in "T&B" mode the signal is routet through a NJW1194V for Volume + Treble + Bass control; this is the mode which works with the remote.
When switching from bypass to t&b mode the volume from the pot is transferred to the NJW1194V (in this case volume is "in sync" with the pot), as soon as you change the volume with the remote a "not in sync" symbol is shown to warn you that the current electronic volume setting is different from the pot, so in case you switch back from the "electronic mode" to bypass mode there will be a volume jump to the pot position/volume. Anyways, the loss in sound quality should be corresponding to the loss caused by the NJW1194V.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom