Yes when there's information to withhold.
If there is no information to withhold then there is no crisis, and there is no need for authoritative management which will control information dissemination, just because.
Yes when there's information to withhold.
.. I got into horrible trouble with my family when I joked about carrying a loaded Glock to enforce masks...
Ok what scientific information do you thinks being purposely withheld right now ? Those incharge are over sharing if anything, Desperately.If there is no information to withhold then there is no crisis, and there is no need for authoritative management which will control information dissemination, just because.
Only a couple are stupid enough, percentually it makes sense there are at least some 'among us'.This thread has turned into a forum for Covid-19 deniers. What's next? Holocaust denier threads? Climate change deniers threads?
Only a couple are stupid enough, percentually it makes sense there are at least some 'among us'.
Sadly, that is reliable news, and originally published in the Lancet.
Well, that is that the Chinese trial we heard about last week that was stopped early, due to a lack of patients.No clinical benefits from remdesivir, study finds
”Unfortunately, our trial found that while safe and adequately tolerated, remdesivir did not provide significant benefits over placebo,” said Bin Cao from China-Japan Friendship Hospital and Capital Medical University in China, who led the research.
“This is not the outcome we hoped for.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/l...wn-china-toll-as-us-infections-pass-1-million
I don't see any denial, there's a attack on our way of life , the mechanisms we have built society on are under threat and the damage and unpreparedness is profound.This thread has turned into a forum for Covid-19 deniers. What's next? Holocaust denier threads? Climate change deniers threads?
As I said, published in the Lancet, which is the major UK medical journal, and one of the top medical journals in the world. As with all scientific research, it may one day turn out to be not true, or not quite true, but for now this is as good as it gets. See here for subsequent comment in the Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31023-0/fulltext Science is an ongoing discussion, but this was/is good and credible research.The more important point is whether the research is reliable, not the reporting.
As I said, published in the Lancet, which is the major UK medical journal, and one of the top medical journals in the world.
What is political about publishing good academic research that meets all the standards of a high ranking journal?
OK, submit a rebuttal to this journal or another top ranking journal.Assumes facts not in evidence.