Thanks for sharing. I’m sure we all want a doctor who minimizes the impact of human suffering and advises to not take action in a pandemic. Some if his statements are flat wrong, for example, regarding aerosols, as the Chinese restaurant study shows. Many of the sweeping statements about excess hospital capacity are either gratuitous or out of date. Frankly, I am disgusted.
Overview
- According to data from the best-studied countries such as South Korea, Iceland, Germany and Denmark, the overall lethality of Covid19 is between 0.1% and 0.4% and thus up to twenty times lower than initially assumed by the WHO.
Results of NY Antibody Testing
If the actual infection rate among the entire population is similar to the early sample infection rate they found of 13.9%, it would change the death rate of the state, Cuomo said. New York is reporting 15,500 COVID-19 deaths, and if 2.7 million people were infected, that would mean the death rate would be 0.5%, Cuomo said.
2. A study in Nature Medicine comes to a similar conclusion even for the Chinese city of Wuhan. The initially significantly higher values for Wuhan were obtained because many people with only mild or no symptoms were not recorded.
Yes the death rate is not as high as originally reported. However I would like to see them show the actual nunbers.
The median age of the deceased in most countries (including Italy) is over 80 years and only about 1% of the deceased had no serious previous illnesses. The age and risk profile of deaths thus essentially corresponds to normal mortality. Up to 60% of all Covid19-related deaths have occurred in particularly vulnerable nursing homes.
Let's see if I understand this. If you're not in the best of the health (diabetic, kidney issues, heart disease, etc.), you're less likely to survive. Well duhh! The fact that it
corresponds to normal mortality is especially sneaky because it seems to indicate that there's no difference in survival when what it really means is that the less healthy are more likely to die from the virus.
Many media reports of young and healthy people dying from Covid19 have proven to be false upon closer inspection. Many of these people either did not die from Covid19 or they in fact had serious preconditions (such as undiagnosed leukaemia).
A single person from Spain, a 21 yr old soccer coach, who died from Corona had leukemia. Remember that leukemia is one of the more curable cancers so there's the possibility it would have been detected and treated if not for the virus. The other reference is to a Connecticut infant who died and tested positive for the Corona virus. While the governor said the death was due to Corona virus, the coroner had not determined cause of death at that point. I haven't found a followup and a quick search showed that there may have been other infant deaths. In any case, using isolated examples to prove a general statement is misleading.
Normal overall mortality in the US is about 8000 people per day, in Germany about 2600 people and in Italy about 1800 people per day. Influenza mortality in the US is up to 80,000, in Germany and Italy up to 25,000, and in Switzerland up to 1500 people per winter.
The first statement is meaningless. Yes people die! It's only useful as to whether there are excess deaths from the virus which it doesn't address.
A piece of data I found.
From a NY Times Article on excess mortality
Switzerland Mar. 9 - Apr. 5 21% 1,000−712=300
Spain Mar. 9 - Apr. 5 66% 19,700−12,401=7,300
NYC Mar. 11 - Apr. 22 300% 19,200−15,411=3,800
The 80,000 got revised down to 61,000 (do your research!) and the average for 2010-2019 is around 37,000. It also avoids an important point. There is a vaccine for flu.
CDC Data
Vaccination coverage varied by state, ranging from 46.0%–81.1% among children and from 33.9%–56.3% among adults, and of the ten states with the lowest coverage for children eight were also among the ten states with the lowest coverage for adults. Sep 26, 2019
Death rates would likely be lower if everyone got vaccinated. Also flu deaths are for an entire year, Corona is for a few months.
I could go on and on, but it does get tedious. They make a lot of general statements that are either vaguely true or over-generalizations or that people who die already had other conditions or are minority opinions.
The general impression I get is their name is unintentionally correct,
Swiss Propaganda Research. They (or at least this article ) try to find the best facts and generalizations to mislead their readers, i.e. propaganda.