The plastic part under the tonarm was broken.Hope the cueing device still works...
With the 3D part from Shapeways (not longer available)
it works.
The plastic part under the tonarm was broken.Hope the cueing device still works...
I have one of those turntables. Definitely qualifies for nice I’d say and not uber expensive either. The fully automatic function is a complete revelation, put the record on press one button and your done until side twoIt looks nice, but doesn't lift the arm when the end of the record is reached. That is a failure at 2500€, in my humble opinion. It's not that they forgot how to do it either, as their two cheapest models are fully automatic (and the second cheapest isn't that bad either).
![]()
This is an audio forum. Who said anything about need?Exactly this. Whilst there may be a 'use-case' for a 7" only turntable, I too would ask why? I suspect it's because the manufacturer thinks they can sell them, and not because anyone actually needs one.
Wants rather than needs.
S.
Haha indeed. If we started talking like that, in rational, practical ways, we could dismiss turntables as a whole. Who needs that? So superfluous and nothing but e-waste.This is an audio forum. Who said anything about need?
Rick “not a matter of whirled peas” Denney
Wow! That video is a tour de force of vapid inanity - "what I think they got right is just making one".
I'd say an upgrade of the cartridge. The cartridge in the photo is Audio Technica's bottom of the line.I have one of those turntables. Definitely qualifies for nice I’d say and not uber expensive either. The fully automatic function is a complete revelation, put the record on press one button and your done until side two
Built in switchable phono stage as well if you need it for amps that don’t have one. And the SQ is as good as any from this archaic format, still nice tho. What more do you need.
View attachment 473284View attachment 473287
And I do know what you are saying, Robin, glad you mentioned it. You know, I sat down one day and tried a multitude of cartridges and I kept going back to itI'd say an upgrade of the cartridge. The cartridge in the photo is Audio Technica's bottom of the line.
Just sayin'.
Not with that stylus it isn't - DN251E elliptical will clean up the highs a lot (done it and it works a treat!) and AT now do a 3.5g tracking elliptical (YIKES!!!) for the 3500L version (ATN3600LE) which is around £25 in the UK and $59 in the US I gather.SQ is as good as any from this archaic format, still nice tho. What more do you need.
View attachment 473287
It's good enough for vinyl listening in this subjective hobby, as I explained in a bit more depth in a post following it. I get the audio snobbery, but I really don’t care, it sounds good enough, in fact I've tried numerous more expensive cartridges and didn’t like the way they sounded. We are being over critical here, just as many are with DACs. Splitting hairs!Not with that stylus it isn't - DN251E elliptical will clean up the highs a lot (done it and it works a treat!) and AT now do a 3.5g tracking elliptical (YIKES!!!) for the 3500L version (ATN3600LE) which is around £25 in the UK and $59 in the US I gather.
I use this as an upgrade for the AT91/Rega Carbon version, tracking cleanly at 2g - https://www.thakker.eu/en/needles/t...M6mIEgAwyUfUmYWq9tce38epahGYfH5kNYXoWV8NGcjVL
Bass quality will depend how resonant the cabinet it's sat on is
Apologies folks, can't help myself - it was my effin' job for decades, after all.
I had a couple of the AT 3600L cartridges, understand what you are saying as regards its neutrality compared to most other cartridges which tend to be elevated in the treble. For $30 it's hard to beat. I had slightly better results with the Shure M-44-7, no longer in production. It had the virtue of being able to stay in the groove of almost anything. Turned out to be very useful when I was transferring LPs to digital formats about ten years ago. But he AT 3600L comes very close and is still in production.It's good enough for vinyl listening in this subjective hobby, as I explained in a bit more depth in a post following it. I get the audio snobbery, but I really don’t care, it sounds good enough, in fact I've tried numerous more expensive cartridges and didn’t like the way they sounded. We are being over critical here, just as many are with DACs. Splitting hairs!
I luckily never did fall down the rabbit hole of perfection or finding a grail when I took up the turntable hobby this time around as it came into vogue again. I very much did the chasing the tail thing with DAC’s though. For me the AT3600L is all I ever want and need for vinyl listening and for the amount I do that its perfection. I don’t have to worry about an expensive cartridge either, and replacements are easily available and cheap. And I thoroughly enjoy its sound signature so it really is everything I want for casual vinyl use.I had a couple of the AT 3600L cartridges, understand what you are saying as regards its neutrality compared to most other cartridges which tend to be elevated in the treble. For $30 it's hard to beat. I had slightly better results with the Shure M-44-7, no longer in production. It had the virtue of being able to stay in the groove of almost anything. Turned out to be very useful when I was transferring LPs to digital formats about ten years ago. But he AT 3600L comes very close and is still in production.
Conical vs even a nicely finished bonded elliptical.. If I can tell the improvbem,ent (measurable too) on a 1970s Garrard AP76, you can hear it on your deck, but it's up to you. High end vinyl way over my means today, but ain't snobbery I assure you, but a hundred quid dac kind of makes it a bit pointless. It's not all about 'sound' thoughIt's good enough for vinyl listening in this subjective hobby, as I explained in a bit more depth in a post following it. I get the audio snobbery, but I really don’t care, it sounds good enough, in fact I've tried numerous more expensive cartridges and didn’t like the way they sounded. We are being over critical here, just as many are with DACs. Splitting hairs!
Because in a club setting you have different needs & a dedicated turntable setup for each size makes sense.I am baffled why anyone would need/want a turntable dedicated to playing 7" records when a conventional turntable can play them easily - as well as 12" vinyl which is surely the 'common' vinyl format in DJ'ing.

arstechnica.com
4 minutes per sideI consider myself pretty neutral in the "Vinyl VS Digital" preference, May anyone enjoy any format he/she pleases, but this
Perhaps i should have posted this in "a call for humor" thread though.
![]()
Tiny Vinyl is a new pocketable record format for the Spotify age
Format is “more aligned with how artists are making and releasing music in the streaming era.”…arstechnica.com
I'm at a loss for anything good to say about this, so I won't say anything about it & let the implications be my statement.I consider myself pretty neutral in the "Vinyl VS Digital" preference, May anyone enjoy any format he/she pleases, but this
Perhaps i should have posted this in "a call for humor" thread though.
![]()
Tiny Vinyl is a new pocketable record format for the Spotify age
Format is “more aligned with how artists are making and releasing music in the streaming era.”…arstechnica.com
Also don't want to know how large the angular error for typical non-tangential tonearms will be (unless someone readjusts them just for those), if of course the turntable isn't (semi-)automatic and has stopped this tragic playback before it begins.4 minutes per side
Speaking traditionally, if a format doesn't even support a proper acid or hardtrance track (10+ min.), it's out.