Gorgeous. Yours?
It is quite pretty.
That's a real thing of beauty.
We had a turntable with the same design (acoustic playback, 45 & 78 rpm). I remember ours being painted blue. There were still children's 78s (and 45s) made back around 1960. That record player made our Bille Holiday LP sound real funny - it was taken from the Decca sides, as I recall, some of the very first commercial tape recordings made in the US.That's a real thing of beauty.
Think about it, all that work and money, only to end up with a 1960s level of analog sound.
Now here's a kool idea, have some fun with the nostalgia of what looks to be a combo of a 1920s acoustic tonearm while using modern AC power for the platter drive. For sure a kool combo of ideas, no need for an expensive MM or MC needle, in fact you can grow your own on a cactus while escaping the need to manually crank up the patter motor every side or two of playback. Then spend a few thousand $ on building a gorgeous wood home for it all and post photos all over the net.
More OOOOHs and AHHHHs than a new born baby girl.![]()
Yesterday I was lamenting the lack of a head->desk emoji. Whereas now I could do with the "Yaaasaawwwn" one.Now here's a kool idea, have some fun with the nostalgia of what looks to be a combo of a 1920s acoustic tonearm while using modern AC power for the platter drive. For sure a kool combo of ideas, no need for an expensive MM or MC needle......
Yep, @amirm is a good leader and has made great choices for the overall operation of ASR. But his non-inclusionary discriminatory practices towards emoji's is a bit of an embarrassment in today's world.Yesterday I was lamenting the lack of a head->desk emoji. Whereas now I could do with the "Yaaasaawwwn" one.
![]()
They will be built to order, so likely not cheapRidiculous product. Style over substance. The turntable for someone who doesn't play records!
No speed selection. Claims it does it automatically, so how does it tell 12" 45rpm singles from 12" 33rpm? How does it cue up anything other than Track 1? As to the price...
S.
I advise against using a spotlight to find dust particles on it or you might be "BLINDED by the LIGHT"!Glass turntable from glass speaker company.
Transpa.rent https://transpa.rent/us/ has a post about their brutalist speaker and they have glass speakers. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...kers-in-the-world.17178/page-193#post-2149479
Now they have a glass turntable. Only $1300US. At least it shouldn't suffer from the plastic dustcover hinge breakage problem, but maybe it needs some kind of fabric dust cover to keep dust out of the sides?
![]()
That's going to ring like a bell at resonant frequencies though. I don't think there is much natural damping in glass.Glass turntable from glass speaker company.
Transpa.rent https://transpa.rent/us/ has a post about their brutalist speaker and they have glass speakers. https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...kers-in-the-world.17178/page-193#post-2149479
Now they have a glass turntable. Only $1300US. At least it shouldn't suffer from the plastic dustcover hinge breakage problem, but maybe it needs some kind of fabric dust cover to keep dust out of the sides?
![]()
And if you are not careful, you are going to be Walking on Broken Glass."BLINDED by the LIGHT"!
In this turntable world, what is considered expensive or cheap?They will be built to order, so likely not cheap
anyways, i meant interesting design-wise, not because i'm actually interested in the product![]()
I think this model quite rare in the US. So beautiful - poss to upload a more bright picture ? I'm also fan of B&O design.Beogram 3000 from 1972, I'm still very fond of it - and it still sounds good and tracks properly (SP12 stylus very low hours). Drive was idler in tapered motor pulley for fine speed adjustment and then a soft round cross-section belt to the inner hub. It's a bit too much of a record playing 'appliance' though, as with all later Beograms, as there's no 'faff' involved in using it and the auto functions are rapid
View attachment 433412