Ok while you imply no-one should be interested in my opinion, you manage three rapid-fire responses.
We've dealt with the question of whether I'm just upset that some like this music. Clearly, I'm not. On the other question of authority/expertise to comment, forum threads will provoke discussion (naturally) and I just happen to think the question of "what is rock/hard rock/metal?" in terms of this group is an interesting tangent. Maybe you do, maybe you don't. Responding to my earlier post
@Audiofire gave an interesting historical counterpoint which I examined further and think has merit. Otoh both you and
@Caldera dive straight into a credentials fallacy which is beneath you both.
Informative background after listening to them Choke upthread. Their affection for throwback-rock derives from admiration for Gilmour and others. Easy to see why some of the old-timers here like it, but not my cup of tea, too bland and slow-paced, not much in the way of imagination or interesting sonic textures, etc. You can indeed hear their professed K-pop influence in the harmonies though.
You quoted the bold snippet only, but there was context. When it comes to aesthetic responses, we know
de gustibus non est disputandum. So discussing "imagination or interesting sonic textures" is nuanced and subjective. Which doesn't prevent us considering objective characteristics of artistic work, just not asserting objective superiority of same. We can measure "pace" of course: The Warning's track
Choke (subject of our recent posts) measures 88 bpm, while the similarly moody first track of BMTH's
Sempiternal (the album I mentioned directly above) measures 171 bpm. We'd have to broaden the analysis to cover the discography but the generalisation that some music is faster-paced (per track or on a sub-genre basis) is obviously measurable. It's simply a fact that can inform preference, but equally obviously says nothing about value vs a different preference.
That is more on you than the band. Let's hear from a music teacher:
The music teacher makes my argument: pointing to a little vocal effect (standard stuff) a guitar he likes, a vocal crescendo or two he likes, and a short snare drum effect. In other words, it's a straightforward presentation with few elements and not much sonic or compositional complexity. Not usually my cup of tea, it's too simple and clean. But it's well executed (in terms of both playing and singing) and he's happy, presumably you are too. There's no reason you shouldn't be.