As I said in the private convo you initiated but apparently lost interest in, there's not doubt pop (and rock) stars and groups may well trade on sex appeal. But I wasn't kidding about a generation gap. I was a child last century and a teenager for the first decade of this one, for 70s and 80s rock references I dive into my parents' taste (my mum remembered the Pretenders) which is entirely cool. There was certainly an explosion of female artists from the late 70s. I'm not a fan of blues-based rock (to put it another way, I like the rock but not the roll) so that bluesy Led Zeppelin stuff is almost as bad as country to my ear (otoh the angle
Houses of the Holy takes on that stuff is not bad at all). But I didn't grow up with it and if you did you'll have a different feeling for rock music I imagine.
So some recent rock'n'rollers playing to sexist tropes looks more like Stockholm syndrome to me. Ok I'm not always enamoured of mainstream and a Disney product like Miley breaking out into same isn't going to have initial appeal. Previous generations certainly internalised the male gaze because that was the only perspective on offer. Obviously some still do. of course you can find examples galore.
But I did actually say I was hard pressed to think of a female artist/group that
I like a lot that writes/performs/dresses to please men. I did subsequently think of Babymetal
but looking at my list of most played stuff per Apple Music I can see (from the top) Arca, Charli xcx, Banshee, Cherry Glazerr, Poppy, Swan Meat, yeule, Coucou Chloe, Jack Off Jill, MIA, FKA twigs, Gurldoll, Alice Glass, Kelsey Lu, Lana Del Rey, London Grammar, Agnes Obel ... so to the extent that you addressed that question to me, then not really
for men (for people, sure). Where does that leave things?