- Joined
- Jun 10, 2018
- Messages
- 6,219
- Likes
- 9,336
https://nikonrumors.com/2020/07/31/...dslr-sales-still-higher-than-mirrorless.aspx/
This is a few months old, but if you did not see it, it's worth reading.
Most interesting tidbit:
How long will Nikon continue to support the F-mount? The response: F-mount has been around since 1959 and Nikon is not planning to walk away from F-mount because DSLR bodies are better for certain types of photography (better than mirrorless), for example: sports, car racing, erratic movements like BIF. Nikon does not see any changes to F-mount in the next 5 to 7 years (at least)
Other:
Not mentioned is my reason for not switching to mirrorless. The viewfinder experience is different and I'm old and don't want to change. I read the opposite viewpoint from someone who said he was old and did not want for the mirrorless cameras to improve because he would probably quit shooting first.
I continue to predict DSLR cameras with sensors smaller than FX/135 will disappear fairly soon. New FX lenses from Nikon will be scarce. I would love to see an improved version of the 24-120VR, but have little hope. The article mentions some Telephoto zooms but is not clear as to whether they are for DSLR or native Z. I suspect the longer the focal length the less advantage there is in designing for Native Z.
This is a few months old, but if you did not see it, it's worth reading.
Most interesting tidbit:
How long will Nikon continue to support the F-mount? The response: F-mount has been around since 1959 and Nikon is not planning to walk away from F-mount because DSLR bodies are better for certain types of photography (better than mirrorless), for example: sports, car racing, erratic movements like BIF. Nikon does not see any changes to F-mount in the next 5 to 7 years (at least)
Other:
- Nikon’s DSLR volume sales are higher than mirrorless sales. As of September this was still true. With the Pandemic limiting activities, it's difficult to use 2020 sales as a projection for anything.
- DSLR has about 65% of the light hitting the sensor. The mirrorless bodies have 90% of the light hitting the sensor.
Not mentioned is my reason for not switching to mirrorless. The viewfinder experience is different and I'm old and don't want to change. I read the opposite viewpoint from someone who said he was old and did not want for the mirrorless cameras to improve because he would probably quit shooting first.
I continue to predict DSLR cameras with sensors smaller than FX/135 will disappear fairly soon. New FX lenses from Nikon will be scarce. I would love to see an improved version of the 24-120VR, but have little hope. The article mentions some Telephoto zooms but is not clear as to whether they are for DSLR or native Z. I suspect the longer the focal length the less advantage there is in designing for Native Z.