Imakeller
Active Member
The looks are indeed hideous.
But it’s the implied vanity that’s the thing.
I may be in the minority, but I think they look great (except for the color). To each their own when it comes to design.
The looks are indeed hideous.
But it’s the implied vanity that’s the thing.
Fair enough. I suppose whoever buys them can afford to have a car detailer come in once a week to keep them tidyI may be in the minority, but I think they look great (except for the color). To each their own when it comes to design.
I may be in the minority, but I think they look great (except for the color). To each their own when it comes to design.
After you've seen enough speaker measurements, it becomes easy to surmise with a reasonable degree of accuracy what will work and what won't. Not "subjective."Completely subjective. I’m not aware of any published objective measurements. You can measure speakers just by looking at them? You label Wilson’s claims as fraudulent and label him as unprofessional? I don’t see a radical departure in the Wilson Audio of today compared to the days of yore, but you are entitled to your opinion on that as well.
I remember him from back in Berkeley in the 1980s, he had the best sounding Large Advent system I ever heard, particularly and specifically in reproducing opera and lieder.I encountered some audio reviewers (they call themselves "audio journalists") at the one audio show I attended, and I really have to restrain myself from ridiculing them. Making fun of them is "punching down," so to speak, despite the influence they wield in this peculiar hobby.
If you've got the money honey, they've got the time.I may be in the minority, but I think they look great (except for the color). To each their own when it comes to design.
This isn't about his "looks". His beard doesn't look like that by accident. It's a very deliberate choice. It's totally fair to make inferences on what such a choice implies.So much venom … you guys can be too much. Not enough to rage on subjectively about the speakers, now you gotta insult the guy based on his looks?
I'm betting it's all about phase alignment and timing differences among the different beard lobes.This isn't about his "looks". His beard doesn't look like that by accident. It's a very deliberate choice. It's totally fair to make inferences on what such a choice implies.
But Wait! There's more!Also, with regards to the speaker's likely measurements, you can tell some things by looking, yes. Such as the multitude of diffractive edges everywhere which serve no beneficial acoustic purpose.
Finally, the combination of measurements of another Wilson speaker as well as Wilson plainly being a fashion brand rather than a serious engineering-focused one also makes it fair to assume this is not aiming for anything resembling accuracy.
I bet this dude knows a thing or two about the science of countermeasurentsHmmm … beard styling as a speaker measurement device … how scientific!
I doubt that this machine is needed for such creativity.unwilling to use a six-figure Klippel machine.
Then again, isn't it basically a big robot?I doubt that this machine is needed for such creativity.![]()
Yeah, I wanna see them get it on, sounds . . .Then again, isn't it basically a big robot?
You may laugh, but car wax on metal furniture actually works really well in my experience. It holds up really well, keeps it shiny, keeps dust off, retards oxidation, etc...Fair enough. I suppose whoever buys them can afford to have a car detailer come in once a week to keep them tidy