MarkWinston
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2021
- Messages
- 736
- Likes
- 579
What do you guys think about this? Worth it?
If it's so good they can send it to Amir or Erin for proper testing.What do you guys think about this? Worth it?
who would put a resistor in series to a woofer?Appears to have decent sensitivity as well since there's no resistor on the woofer circuit.
This guy wouldwho would put a resistor in series to a woofer?
Well, he shouldn’t.This guy would
The tweeter has a tiny waveguide or sound lens (whatever you want to call it). This results in somewhat narrower, controlled dispersion in the upper treble followed by pronounced edge diffraction (waveguide is no longer effective) in the 2-4kHz range. An old-school tweeter (without a tiny waveguide) might deliver better results in terms of directivity.Is the bunched up horizontal sound because the tweeter is offset? Or just not waveguided?
Unfortunately, Danny never specifies which angles he measures, it could be, if it comes quite bad, that the 45° or even the 60 ° horizontal frequency response reaches the level of on-axis frequency response in the 2-3 kHz range, but in the upper treble has already dropped 10-15dB.
The last GR research kit speaker tested here did quite well, so I don't doubt this could be a very solid speaker.
And the same directivity problem and poor tuning (off-axis peak in the presence region) like the bookshelf version:
View attachment 220607
Didn’t watch the video but somehow I can imagine his tone “this is brilliant, absolutely amazing “And the same directivity problem and poor tuning (off-axis peak in the presence region) like the bookshelf version:
View attachment 220607