- Joined
- Dec 26, 2017
- Messages
- 2,746
- Likes
- 2,377
Did you not mean 0.9% peak wow when you wrote this? That is what I commented on..Quasi peak W&F was around .9 and weighted RMS W&F was bouncing between .03 and .04%.
EDIT :See that you corrected it now , makes 0.09% more sense. I also see that you retracted your original post 160 and changed it.. .2 seconds before i posted a reply to it...
for sake of comparison here is the NAK vs AnalogmagiK W&F software.( and Multitone). the phone apps typically show 0.05% variation in this case ( apps call it wow og W&F even if it is not DIN W&F). A very good test record is used below, some others can have +.55hz wow of 0.2 and 0.3% and are pretty useless, even with centering. That is why I prefer gyroscopes to check drive w&f. Record does tell about some other problems that can be seen in plots below..
Here are some revealing gyroscope basen speed data, 4th order Butterwoth low pass filtered 10 hz to focus on wow.
If I should buy a new turntable today it would probably be Denon 3000ne, it is very close to Technics 1300g in speed performance and have some interesting design features , and an arm based on the old arm theory if Denon ,, that sets it apart from the Technics. And then it is the Technics platter stories that worry me..
But what I really want is a JVC QL-Y5F, a player I looked at being for sake locally a long time but was sold just minutes before I decided to buy it..
Attachments
Last edited: