A decent video on wave forming by a well known acoustics designer:
Pretty neat idea and seems like it could work. I have doubts if performance can be that much better than my 5 subs with over a dozen bass traps, but could be worth considering.
I definitely want to hear a proper "waveform" setup now as I'm used to exceptionally accurate and tight bass that rolls off very fast in my room. However, it took a lot of trial and error to get there, including elevating my subs off the floor, over a dozen bass traps, time alignment and level matching.
I keep hearing dealers and YouTubers talk about how great Trinnov's room EQ and wave forming are, and they may very well be industry leading. However, show me some distortion measurements. My bass distortion is already so far below 1% at over 90dB and 20 Hz... I have never heard or measured another setup that can compete. For a small room, this is exceptional already with just a $1500 pro audio speaker processor (DSP+DACs inside) and an RME soundcard? Just the 20 channels it would take to run my 5.1 setup is tens of thousands in Trinnov land.
View attachment 515998
And yes, I tried Dirac Live PC software some time ago, but it added the faintest artifacts to certain songs and wasted digital headroom, so I got rid of it. How do I know Trinnov's room correction won't do the same?
Dirac already made my waterfall plots look perfect, but I finally decided after 100 hours that the digital headroom and getting rid of the artifacts it added, made it not worth it. If you draw a sloped line for my house curve, I'm already +/-5dB with no EQ and no curve smoothing.
That said, I'm still considering a Trinnov Altitude CI just for immersive decoding, and maybe I buy one and like it so much I want to add more channels to wave form my 5 subs...
View attachment 515996
View attachment 515997