New TAD CE1TX

[Pearljam5000]

They look pretty cool
Price is $32K

 

[dfuller]

Another megabuck passive speaker. Snore.

 

[AdamG]

Is that for the Penthouse Condo? Great price someone should jump on that.

 

[Pearljam5000]

Another megabuck passive speaker. Snore.

I'm guessing the 8361 would sound at least as good and would cost much less

 

[GDK]

Is it just me, or is their positioning slightly sub-optimal?

 

[dfuller]

I'm guessing the 8361 would sound at least as good and would cost much less

Almost certainly better, and don't need an amp, plus have enough DSP horsepower on board to help with any room weirdness.

Is that for the Penthouse Condo? Great price someone should jump on that.

Solid reference.

 

[pablolie]

Is it just me, or is their positioning slightly sub-optimal?

Yeah indeed, these lifestyle pics without any cabling and outrageously stupid positioning always entertain me. It also works like that in real life - I have a friend that bought B&W Nautilus and squished them into room corners, and they sounded like garbage... the struggle is real...

 

[jonfitch]

I don't get the value proposition for 32k. TAD's Compact Reference 1 monitor is $37k (aka Fang Bian's personal speakers lol) and has a beryllium tweeter and midrange (arguably overpriced anyway because of the Paradigm Personas, if they didn't have weird FR anomalies).

Who would pay 5k less for something that uses magnesium drivers from the lower Evolution line, especially when the ME1 is less than half the price of this?

 

[thewas]

Stereophile has already reviewed and measured it, not bad at all, even more for "high end", but on the other side as said the price...

TAD CE1TX loudspeaker Measurements

Sidebar 3: Measurements I used DRA Labs' MLSSA system and a calibrated DPA 4006 microphone to measure the TAD CE1TX's behavior in the farfield, and an Earthworks QTC-40 mike for the nearfield responses. The mesh that covers the coaxial drive unit can't be removed, but the measured behavior was...

www.stereophile.com

 

[restorer-john]

Stereophile has already reviewed and measured it, not bad at all, even more for "high end", but on the other side as said the price...

What's rather strange is @John Atkinson states figure 1 is a measurement taken with a DATs (Dayton Audio Test System) V2 unit and yet the plot shows the familiar AP (audio Precision) style graph and watermark...

A DATs V3 produces this type of impedance plot:

 

[Pearljam5000]

I don't get the value proposition for 32k. TAD's Compact Reference 1 monitor is $37k (aka Fang Bian's personal speakers lol) and has a beryllium tweeter and midrange (arguably overpriced anyway because of the Paradigm Personas, if they didn't have weird FR anomalies).

Who would pay 5k less for something that uses magnesium drivers from the lower Evolution line, especially when the ME1 is less than half the price of this?

It says $87K

 

[bodhi]

Another megabuck passive speaker. Snore.

+1

Case of "the final touch for our new, pretty good $2k speaker was to add $30k to the price"

 

[Waxx]

Tad are good speakers, but with at least one 0 to much in the price, that is nothing new. But at least the sound is quiet good, contrary to most others in that price bracket.

But give me some big JBL or Neumann, or single driver fullrange speakers (that i make myself for a few hundreds) over this speaker anyday. It's just a fancy looking bling piece with a expensive name, and with a good sound as extra...

 

[jonfitch]

It says $87KView attachment 290718

That's a pretty serious price increase. I wonder who would pony up that money considering used CR1s have gone for 10-12k in the past.

 

[John Atkinson]

What's rather strange is @John Atkinson states figure 1 is a measurement taken with a DATs (Dayton Audio Test System) V2 unit and yet the plot shows the familiar AP (audio Precision) style graph and watermark...

View attachment 290714

A DATs V3 produces this type of impedance plot:

View attachment 290713

For consistency in how I have presented loudspeaker impedance graphs over the past 3 decades I meaure with DATS but plot the data with the Audio Precision System One app.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

 

[Pearljam5000]

What's rather strange is @John Atkinson states figure 1 is a measurement taken with a DATs (Dayton Audio Test System) V2 unit and yet the plot shows the familiar AP (audio Precision) style graph and watermark...

View attachment 290714

A DATs V3 produces this type of impedance plot:

View attachment 290713

According to the measurements which is better CE1 or Genelec 8361?

 

[restorer-john]

For consistency in how I have presented loudspeaker impedance graphs over the past 3 decades I meaure with DATS but plot the data with the Audio Precision System One app.

I figured that's what you were doing, pulling the exported data file from the DATs hardware, and using the AP software to plot the data. Maybe consider removing the "AP" logo going forward, in the interests of transparency.

 

[PGAMiami]

I don't get the value proposition for 32k. TAD's Compact Reference 1 monitor is $37k (aka Fang Bian's personal speakers lol) and has a beryllium tweeter and midrange (arguably overpriced anyway because of the Paradigm Personas, if they didn't have weird FR anomalies).

Who would pay 5k less for something that uses magnesium drivers from the lower Evolution line, especially when the ME1 is less than half the price of this?

 

[Anthony LoFi]

It says $87KView attachment 290718

Hey Pearl,
You have forgotten the extra expense of getting an acoustician ( you know, a person who uses software and mics to modify the audio input to take account of room abnormalities) to finish off the install.
Because anyone who spends this sort of $ wants audio perfection.

PS I think the promo photos where taken before they where insalled by the acoustician!