• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

New speakers $3000

easyrider

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2026
Messages
10
Likes
7
Currently running Adam A5X with an Adam Sub 7 but looking to upgrade.. budget of around £1500 -£2000 UK pounds

Room is 16 square metres. It’s treated with Gik 244 Bass Traps FlexRange.

Any suggestions in this price range…?

I reached out to Adam Audio about swapping out the A5X and getting the A7V and keeping my sub.

Adam responded and said A7H would be fine for use with my sub just alter settings to accommodate

I’m also looking at 3 way monitors like the Dynaudio LYD 48 and thoughts on those ?

Thanks
 
Currently running Adam A5X with an Adam Sub 7 but looking to upgrade.. budget of around £1500 -£2000 UK pounds

Room is 16 square metres. It’s treated with Gik 244 Bass Traps FlexRange.

Any suggestions in this price range…?

I reached out to Adam Audio about swapping out the A5X and getting the A7V and keeping my sub.

Adam responded and said A7H would be fine for use with my sub just alter settings to accommodate

I’m also looking at 3 way monitors like the Dynaudio LYD 48 and thoughts on those ?

Thanks

Are you open to passive? Palmer orbit might be a fit if not. A7V is an obvious choice.
 
You might consider the new Buchardt Audio actives.


Perhaps a tad over budget, but I’d expect them to be the speaker to beat at their price. And Cardioid too.

Four weeks till delivery (I think).
 
Currently running Adam A5X with an Adam Sub 7 but looking to upgrade.. budget of around £1500 -£2000 UK pounds

Room is 16 square metres. It’s treated with Gik 244 Bass Traps FlexRange.

Any suggestions in this price range…?

I reached out to Adam Audio about swapping out the A5X and getting the A7V and keeping my sub.

Adam responded and said A7H would be fine for use with my sub just alter settings to accommodate

I’m also looking at 3 way monitors like the Dynaudio LYD 48 and thoughts on those ?

Thanks

The A5X is a great speaker. I enjoyed mine.

The A7V will likely be a ‘bigger’ sound, but not better. It’s in a division below the X series.

The new 7H, perhaps. It certainly should be an improvement, though I’ve yet to see any measurements.
 
Anything particular you want to improve on?

Your current sub could be improved on to give you a true full-range system for example. Also, do you have any way of applying EQ to help smooth out the bass response? Something worth considering if not.
 
Last edited:
Any suggestions in this price range…?
This one is worth a look:

 
Anything particular you want to improve on?

Your current sub could be improved on to give you a true full-range system for example. Also, do you have any what of applying EQ to help smooth out the bass response? Something worth considering if not.

Good point and I should not have forgotten.

However good or otherwise your current and future hifi may be, it can and will be mightily improved with even modest DSP room correction.
 
… and not forgetting the ever adored Genelec.

 
Thanks for the suggestions…I’ll take a look at all of them

Thoughts on the Adam A8H?
 
Last edited:
I’m also looking at 3 way monitors like the Dynaudio LYD 48 and thoughts on those ?
With 3 ways you gain cleaner midrange at high volume levels. For Dynaudio monitors there is measurement data for Core 47, which is about double the price of LYD 48 and has a similar speaker arrangement. Palmer Orbit 11 cost even less than LYD 48 and are much better value than both of them. I would prefer the Orbits over Core 47 for their sub 30Hz extension, better dispersion control (coax, cardioid), dual impulse compensating woofers and aluminum housing. Orbit cabinets are completely free of tactile vibration. They will play lower than your Adam sub and unless you want really serious bass levels, you don't need a sub in your small room. The Orbits should be the standard recommendation up to at least double their price. Most forum members that actually heard the Orbits, like them. Chances are that you will come to the same conclusion. If you don't like them, prepare to spend signficantly more to get what you want.
 
Stretch a little?



Or passives:
 
Stretch a little?



Or passives:
Listened to KH 120 and KH 310 in a nearby music store about a week ago in a nearfield setup with direct A/B switching. I found the 310 sounding cleaner in the midrange than the 120. Expectation bias due to the midrange dome may be involved but I would certainly not buy the 120. I also heard the first version of the 120 and the O 300 more than 20 years ago. While I liked the 300, the 120 did not get me excited back then either. KH 150 has great measurements. Maybe it's as good as 310 despite not having a dedicated midrange. But I would listen first before I buy. It definitely needs a sub to extend as low as the Orbits.

In the music store the Neumanns were running with a KH 750 on the floor. Turned it off quickly, because it did not integrate seemless with the sound of the satellites and produced boomy bass. Surely that's a matter of sub/sat alignment and room EQ. The Orbits only require the latter with optimum integration of stereo bass already included. A6B requires amps and a sub while already priced higher than the Orbits. After 15 mins drive home, I listened to my Orbits. Direct A/B comparison to the 310 in my room would be required to establish a clear preference.

Also check out the latest owner feedback on the Orbits. There are many reports like that, spread over the forum. Also a direct comparison to KH 120 at a member's home clearly preferring the Orbits can be found somewhere.

 
With 3 ways you gain cleaner midrange at high volume levels. For Dynaudio monitors there is measurement data for Core 47, which is about double the price of LYD 48 and has a similar speaker arrangement. Palmer Orbit 11 cost even less than LYD 48 and are much better value than both of them. I would prefer the Orbits over Core 47 for their sub 30Hz extension, better dispersion control (coax, cardioid), dual impulse compensating woofers and aluminum housing. Orbit cabinets are completely free of tactile vibration. They will play lower than your Adam sub and unless you want really serious bass levels, you don't need a sub in your small room. The Orbits should be the standard recommendation up to at least double their price. Most forum members that actually heard the Orbits, like them. Chances are that you will come to the same conclusion. If you don't like them, prepare to spend signficantly more to get what you want.

I’ve seen some mint lyd48 for £1300 locally…Thoights at that price?
 
Listened to KH 120 and KH 310 in a nearby music store about a week ago in a nearfield setup with direct A/B switching. I found the 310 sounding cleaner in the midrange than the 120. Expectation bias due to the midrange dome may be involved but I would certainly not buy the 120. I also heard the first version of the 120 and the O 300 more than 20 years ago. While I liked the 300, the 120 did not get me excited back then either. KH 150 has great measurements. Maybe it's as good as 310 despite not having a dedicated midrange. But I would listen first before I buy. It definitely needs a sub to extend as low as the Orbits.

In the music store the Neumanns were running with a KH 750 on the floor. Turned it off quickly, because it did not integrate seemless with the sound of the satellites and produced boomy bass. Surely that's a matter of sub/sat alignment and room EQ. The Orbits only require the latter with optimum integration of stereo bass already included. A6B requires amps and a sub while already priced higher than the Orbits. After 15 mins drive home, I listened to my Orbits. Direct A/B comparison to the 310 in my room would be required to establish a clear preference.

Also check out the latest owner feedback on the Orbits. There are many reports like that, spread over the forum. Also a direct comparison to KH 120 at a member's home clearly preferring the Orbits can be found somewhere.


The KH 310 divide opinion….and there is no way I listen to them to them before hand….i can up my budget if worth it….they are a long term bit of gear so I want to get it right.
 
I’ve seen some mint lyd48 for £1300 locally…Thoights at that price?
In my view lyd48 is a cheap MDF box without specific care for directivity but with high markup for the brand name. Maybe worth considering for half of that price. As it only plays down to 50Hz you must keep your sub while a single Orbit can replace it. The Orbits are fullrange speakers including a dual 8" sub for the same price as a comparable sub alone. And that sub will not have an aluminium enclosure. The Orbits are simply unmatched in value for money.
 
Looking at the measured performance for the Orbits I'm struggling to see what's so amazing about them to be honest?

I’ve seen some mint lyd48 for £1300 locally…Thoights at that price?

Local enough you can go have a listen? Price is in line with recent sold second hand ones on eBay so should be able to move on OK without losing money if you gave them a punt.

You didn't reply to my question about what you were looking to improve, which could help others help you.
 
Back
Top Bottom