• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

New SMSL M500 MKIII, A new device again?

OP
Jimster480

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,894
Likes
2,053
Location
Tampa Bay
That's exactly what SMSL did with the M400 and Sabaj with the D50 with the AK4499. The AK4499 was specially designed by AKM as a 4-channel chip to achieve higher performance in stereo mode. Nevertheless, 2 - 4 OP amps and a few resistors and capacitors were saved on the two devices and 2 of the 4 channels were not connected.
With very cheap devices one could still assume cost savings, but the devices are both well above the $500/€ price range.

Modding danger!
It would be interesting if an experienced DIYer modified one of the cheaper and well-tested SMSL devices with the 9038 Pro and connected the missing channels and sent Amirm to test it.
DAC1/3/5/7, DAC1b/3b/5b/7b, DAC2/4/6/8 and DAC2b/4b/6b/8b must be bridged. To do this, it may be possible to increase the voltage for DVDD, VDD_R and VDD_L from 1.2V to 1.3V.
It makes absolutely no sense to save a few cents on an expensive device. This is why I always question smsl products because they make these decisions that make no sense.
Like you might as well use a much cheaper chip rather than just use this expensive chip for marketing and not connect the channels.
However SMSL is a contract design company. They have so many products because they are submitted on contract bounties AFAIK.
 

Roland68

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,449
Likes
1,271
Location
Cologne, Germany
Without proper firmware this will not work at all.
This would only be the case if SMSL was running the chip in these DACs in multichannel mode, and not in stereo mode.
In Stereo mode, Input Channel 1 is sent to DAC Channels 1/3/5/7 and Input Channel 2 is sent to DAC Channels 2/4/6/8. Then the output should work on all channels at least via the SPDIF input.

Should SMSL actually switch the 9038 Pro to 8 channel mode via register 15 with "Clearing stereo_mode", then that would not only be questionable, but would also significantly increase the possible sources of error in the firmware.
 
OP
Jimster480

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
2,894
Likes
2,053
Location
Tampa Bay
This would only be the case if SMSL was running the chip in these DACs in multichannel mode, and not in stereo mode.
In Stereo mode, Input Channel 1 is sent to DAC Channels 1/3/5/7 and Input Channel 2 is sent to DAC Channels 2/4/6/8. Then the output should work on all channels at least via the SPDIF input.

Should SMSL actually switch the 9038 Pro to 8 channel mode via register 15 with "Clearing stereo_mode", then that would not only be questionable, but would also significantly increase the possible sources of error in the firmware.
Quite interesting, how do you know this? Did you find the manual for the DAC chip?
 

Roland68

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,449
Likes
1,271
Location
Cologne, Germany
Quite interesting, how do you know this? Did you find the manual for the DAC chip?
I still have documents from a project, but the documentation for the 9038 Pro has been available to everyone for a long time.
In the meantime there is also the ES9039PRO 32-bit Flagship Ultra High Performance 8-Channel DAC.
Note the "Ultra High Performance" increase over the ES9038PRO Flagship SABER 32-bit 8-Channel Audio DAC with 140dB DNR :facepalm:
 

madmalkav

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2022
Messages
29
Likes
7
I don't understand why it have balanced XLR output and it doesn't have balanced headphone output.
 

xaviescacs

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Messages
1,499
Likes
1,977
Location
La Garriga, Barcelona
Looks like SMSL changed the screen and now volume is the main attraction, which is nice.
They still miss the filter and the bit depth...

https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...500-mkii-review-dac-hp-amp.29468/post-1030786

:D

Besides, the different color for the "db" word is confusing and difficult to justify, specially if it's the same color that indicates if MQA is fed into the unit. And why so small? And please, align it with the bottom of the volume number! Just take a look at the RME volume display.

Also, there is only one USB input, so the "B" is completely superfluous and potentially misleading, also because many people won't be aware of what the "B" stands for. There are icons for indicating input, so if one doesn't want to put simple "USB" one can put an icon in front of the input option selected. That would be in accordance with the MQA logo on the right side.

Those visual interfaces must communicate everything necessary, but only what's strictly necessary and nothing more, as the user takes for granted that all displayed information is useful. And of course any information must be reliable, which doesn't happen with the "db" in green or the "B" on the usb.

We expect the IV version to be perfect!
 

okok

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2020
Messages
377
Likes
161
main differences vs. mk2
the hp board is totally the same, no upgrading
xmos xu316, not sure what's the big deal since the xu216 or even the old xu106 very stable
the published thd+n is more or less the same, maybe 0.5dB better

the biggest difference
mk2 output 5v rms
mk3: 4v
 

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,429
Likes
2,829
Location
Japan
It seems that the M500 MK3 has arrived at L7Audio, so I think there will be an announcement of the data within a few days.
More than that, there's something like the SMSL SU-10 Dual ESS9038Pro DAC.
 

Wunderphones

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
93
Likes
113
It seems that the M500 MK3 has arrived at L7Audio, so I think there will be an announcement of the data within a few days.
More than that, there's something like the SMSL SU-10 Dual ESS9038Pro DAC.

That's pretty impressive. It probably costs more than, say, the Topping DX7+, though, which measures about that well and has a headphone amp.
 

Lupin

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Messages
586
Likes
983
Dual DAC chips setups are just a marketing gimmick imho that some brands use to justify the ridiculous price tag.
So far all dual DAC chip setups are equal at best and mostly worse dan a single DAC chip setup when looking at objective performance.
 

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,429
Likes
2,829
Location
Japan
SMSL SU-10 was already posted on HP. The price is $900.
But why a transformer power supply?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom