TurtlePaul
Major Contributor
$3,000 for a 10” sub is certainly a price.
Yes, Revel has never priced their subs sensibly. Even with a sale and/or dealer pricing, still doesn't make sense unless you just don't have to care about what things cost and want a matching system all around.$3,000 for a 10” sub is certainly a price.
In what way?To me, this doesn't seem like a Revel speaker. It's kind of a letdown.
Agreed. Let’s also drop the euphemisms: if it’s indeed $3000, it’s not competitive, at least for us ASR-informed. You get for that cash outlay, a pair or even a trio of powerful subwoofers from the likes of HSU, SVS, Rythmik, Monoprice, etc, each capable of obliterating this or most any 10 inchers.$3,000 for a 10” sub is certainly a price.
In what way?
To me, this doesn't seem like a Revel speaker.
Once you experience amazingly powerful deep ceramic composite aluminum 8" woofers mounted in beautifully crafted, rounded cabinets and the signature crazy wide dispersion of Revel F328Be and F228Be, its hard to go back to a smaller, 6.5" design that's obviously as much about reducing shipping size and production costs as the actual audio experience. These speakers ring of compromise. Did the previous Revel engineering team get pink slips? Not my Revel.
Hmm.. both have 8" woofers.You seem to be comparing the new Performa 4 lineup with the Performa Be lineup, when the comparison should be the Performa 4 versus the Performa 3.
It’s just there to advertise a 70% discount and still make a good amount money.$3,000 for a 10” sub is certainly a price.
They look like a premium Infinity.Subjectively, they look more mass market and cheaper to me.
Hmm.. both have 8" woofers.
Performa 3 and Be share a lot of features.
Downgrading to 6.5" woofers is not one of them.
Calling the new design "F346" is begging for an F328Be comparison.
Three 6.5" woofers in the new ones versus two 8" woofers in the previous series. Not really a downgrade, more a sideways move. There are pros and cons to each approach, but the surface areas are comparable.
I disagree. I think they are both fair comparisons. After all, didn’t Kal R do a blind comparison a few years back that included both the f208 and 228be and he couldn’t reliably tell the difference because they were so similar sounding?You seem to be comparing the new Performa 4 lineup with the Performa Be lineup, when the comparison should be the Performa 4 versus the Performa 3.
I do not recall doing that but I would have liked to.I disagree. I think they are both fair comparisons. After all, didn’t Kal R do a blind comparison a few years back that included both the f208 and 228be and he couldn’t reliably tell the difference because they were so similar sounding?
Oh, I just found your article from 2019. It was the 228be and Salon 2 that you found hard to distinguish. My bad.I do not recall doing that but I would have liked to.
I suspect not.Oh, I just found your article from 2019. It was the 228be and Salon 2 that you found hard to distinguish. My bad.
In your opinion, do you think it would be easy to distinguish the f208 and 228be in a blind test?