respice finem
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2021
- Messages
- 2,956
- Likes
- 5,512
We will see (soon)
From what I understand they intentionally cross fairly high - the atc is a bit of a unicorn of a mid dome that it can cross that low. It's a combination of the double suspension keeping rocking modes to a minimum at higher excursions and a pretty generous linear excursion. Neumann's mid isn't optimized for that and I'm not sure it could cross anywhere near there without a pretty deep waveguide. The few bare driver measures I've seen of it show ~500hz as the lowest useful XO point.Second, I think the domed midrange is pretty good, but it can be refined further. ATC manages to keep the crossover point lower at 380 Hz, whereas Neumann crosses high at 570 Hz, surely with more than a decade of driver improvements, Neumann can offer a wider range, and that opens the woofer to higher excursion without IMD too.
There's a fair bit of room to play with in the range.
KH 150: 20 L
KH 310a: 28 L
KH 420: 93 L
Neumann could easily make a KH 310 II around 35L and still have room for a KH 350 around 45/50 L.
From what I understand they intentionally cross fairly high - the atc is a bit of a unicorn of a mid dome that it can cross that low. It's a combination of the double suspension keeping rocking modes to a minimum at higher excursions and a pretty generous linear excursion. Neumann's mid isn't optimized for that and I'm not sure it could cross anywhere near there without a pretty deep waveguide. The few bare driver measures I've seen of it show ~500hz as the lowest useful XO point.
Yes, of course.Keep in mind the internal volumes are quite a bit off from that.
The 310 is about 16L, the 420 around 45. I'd bet the 150 is more like 10-12 internal.
Still, big jump from 16 to 45, they probably could build something around 25L internal with the same drivers in a vertical config.
I doubt that there will be massive discounts: Thomann Germany offers only one left version of the KH 310 right now. The right version will be available "in several month". So I think they cleared their stock right in time ...I'm waiting to see what the pricing of the new KH310 is. Took the plunge and bought a pair a couple of years ago, knowing there was a new version in development. Doubt I will be upgrading any time soon myself.
Don't need digital input or onboard DSP, and reckon the price will be high.
Also curious to see what discounts will be available on the current version to clear the old stock.
(This may be a cause of some annoyance, if they're massive!)
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ew-powered-monitor.17723/page-59#post-1655544If the KH310ii has completed, what will be update next, KH80ii?
There is no 705Hmm, if the 805 II were turned sideways, it would actually fit under the desk! Fortunately I don't think I've ever pushed the 705 to its limits so unless the 805 is priced surprisingly low, the 705 will be safe.
Sorry, meant 750. Fixed.
| Bass capability: Maximum sound pressure in the half-space at 3% THD in 1 m (averaged between 50 Hz and 100 Hz) | 114.9 dB |
|---|
| Bass capability: Maximum sound pressure in the half-space at 3% THD in 1 m (averaged between 50 Hz and 100 Hz) | 116.7 dB SPL |
|---|
| Bass capability: Maximum sound pressure in the half-space at 3% THD in 1 m (averaged between 50 Hz and 100 Hz) | 109 dB |
|---|
| Bass capability: Maximum sound pressure in the half-space at 3% THD in 1 m (averaged between 50 Hz and 100 Hz) | 110.7 dB SPL |
|---|
Indeed: it would be disappointing not to see at least a KH 310 with DSP and the possibility for room EQ WITHOUT a subwoofer.But nothing about the future monitor range, maybe in the next days, or maybe soon, or much later. ??