Capitol C
Active Member
A new way to appeal to tube fans. Description is at https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/turntables/MTI100
I know McIntosh has a long history with turntables (not), but please get the tubes away from the tonearm where your hand needs to go:A new way to appeal to tube fans. Description is at https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/turntables/MTI100
View attachment 246105
It might be a carbon fiber mat. That would be a bonus to have it as a stock item.I know McIntosh has a long history with turntables (not), but please get the tubes away from the tonearm where your hand needs to go:
View attachment 246108
Looks like they left just enough room between the tube cage and the tonearm headshell to fit your fingers.The tubes have no place here. This is tube-desperation!
Nothing new under the sun - reminds me of the Dual HS 152 (just 45 years ago):A new way to appeal to tube fans. Description is at https://www.mcintoshlabs.com/products/turntables/MTI100
View attachment 246105
It's not b*itches brew??Just stumbled across this:
View attachment 246119
A mug that is inconvenient to drink from is a good pairing for this turntable.
Or they might make a Hypex based McIntosh?Mac got bought a month or two ago, so I fully expect the brand to be gutted and ruined in no time. That's what corporations do.
I'd buy a Class D Mac if they developed it and it tested great. Just don't put any stupid fake tubes on it with green LEDs under it.Or they might make a Hypex based McIntosh?
It's one thing to be McIntosh, but to be McInjoke like that?!?
Class D with no tubes?! Count me out!I'd buy a Class D Mac if they developed it and it tested great. Just don't put any stupid fake tubes on it with green LEDs under it.
They just add their famous output transformers to get the house sound.Or they might make a Hypex based McIntosh?
It's one thing to be McIntosh, but to be McInjoke like that?!?
Put your records to close to the tubes, and with low sensitivity loudspeakers, your records will look like that mug!A mug that is inconvenient to drink from is a good pairing for this turntable.
First with the car audio (for a Jeep!) and now this.
Yes, Jeep was always seen as utilitarian and rugged (an undeserved attribute, particularly in the last 20 years). McIntosh was refined and conservative. The pairing makes little sense to me. This new "thing" is simply mind-boggling.To me, that's a weird one. In 'high end' audio, from a marketing standpoint, you'd think you'd want your brand to be associated with a commensurate 'high end' automobile. And the reverse. The 'rub off' effect. For example:
Audi, Lamborghini, Aston Martin: Bang and Olufsen; Bugatti, Merc, Porsche: Burmester; Bentley: Naim; Rolls: in house design; BMW: HK; Cadillac: AKG; Ferrari: JBL; Lexus: Levinson.
Jeeps are expensive, but have always been pretty blue collar in form/function--in spite of the fact that they have become something of a fashion brand. Even the six figure Grand Wagoneer (which features McIntosh) doesn't ring 'high end' transportation, like other brands. In practice it's simply an ugly (but monstrous) SUV. Does Mac consider their gear to be big and ugly? Is that the association? Maybe that's the answer. And maybe they need to work out a deal with Harley-Davidson.
I guess you could argue that Harman Kardon doesn't have an intrinsic upscale brand recognition. People here might remember their Citation stuff. But mostly that's forgotten. AKG, albeit an important and storied studio-oriented brand, isn't really associated with anything home audio. JBL is a mixed bag.