• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

New JBL 1 Series Monitors

617

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
2,433
Likes
5,374
Location
Somerville, MA
Gated at 7ms
That's really interesting. Definitely some HF reflections going on for it to look that wavy. Good pattern control for the size though.
 

andreasmaaan

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
6,652
Likes
9,403
Definitely some HF reflections going on for it to look that wavy.

I suspect that is the result of standing waves across the “mouth” of the “horn”, it being (I presume) circular and conical.
 

617

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
2,433
Likes
5,374
Location
Somerville, MA
I suspect that is the result of standing waves across the “mouth” of the “horn”, it being (I presume) circular and conical.

Yes, for all we love to praise coaxial speakers, the idea of using a speaker cone and its surround as a waveguide is a compromised solution at best. There are a whole bunch of discontinuities between the baffle and tweeter, and all of them are circular.
 

andreasmaaan

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
6,652
Likes
9,403
Yes, for all we love to praise coaxial speakers, the idea of using a speaker cone and its surround as a waveguide is a compromised solution at best. There are a whole bunch of discontinuities between the baffle and tweeter, and all of them are circular.

Absolutely the discontinuities contribute, but you would see this behaviour to a certain extent in any circular, conical horn, even absent the discontinuities. Which absolutely supports your point ofc :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 617

617

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
2,433
Likes
5,374
Location
Somerville, MA
Absolutely the discontinuities contribute, but you would see this behaviour to a certain extent in any circular, conical horn, even absent the discontinuities. Which absolutely supports your point ofc :)

Yes you are correct, these problems exist for woofers, but generally we don't try to use woofers at frequencies where these things become an issue. One exception is the surround resonance, which is very prominent in the SB satori woofers, not so much because the surround is poorly designed, but because the high frequency response is so smooth and extended, the surround resonance becomes visible.

http://www.sbacoustics.com/index.php/products/midwoofers/satori/7-satori-mw19p-4/

See the dip above about 1k.

Putting a tweeter in the center of this situation is a very dicey proposition.
 

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,146
Likes
8,711
Location
NYC
All this being said I do think coaxial is useful for a small nearfield speaker like this intended as an entry-level option. You can place them on a desk well below ear level and still get a pretty clean sound.
 

617

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 18, 2019
Messages
2,433
Likes
5,374
Location
Somerville, MA
Also, I don't know much about driver motor d
All this being said I do think coaxial is useful for a small nearfield speaker like this intended as an entry-level option. You can place them on a desk well below ear level and still get a pretty clean sound.
Yes, I would argue that vertical response is more important in a desktop speaker than almost anywhere else where you are listening very close, and the speakers may not be angled up ideally.
 

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,146
Likes
8,711
Location
NYC
Also, I don't know much about driver motor d

Yes, I would argue that vertical response is more important in a desktop speaker than almost anywhere else where you are listening very close, and the speakers may not be angled up ideally.

I think the first part of your post got cut off =]

But yeah. Smoothest response up to 10K or so seems to be around 15 degrees above axis, although it's a bit hard to tell from this messy graph. Regardless, the vertical response is very close to the horizontal response

JBL 104 Vertical Response.png


For an unfair comparison, here's the Neumann KH80 in the horizontal and vertical planes. The Neumann is a similar compact size - a bit smaller in fact - but cost $1,000 a pair.

As anyone who's been following Neumann speakers knows, the KH80's on-axis performance is crazy-flat, the flattest of any I've measured certainly. The horizontal dispersion is pretty much textbook.

In fact, it was flatter than my original stock MiniDSP Umik-1 could capture, so it was only after purchasing a calibrated Umik-1 from Cross Spectrum Labs that I was able to get this close to Neumann's own measurements. It's always great to see a manufacturer provide a plethora of measurements, and then be able to back those up at home. I wish Harman brands would make their own data more accessible given how much influence Harman research has had on the industry.

KH80 Horizontal.png


In the vertical dimension, the KH80 maintains the impressive flatness up to about 15 degrees above/30 degrees below the listening axis (which Neumann defines as the midpoint between the tweeter and woofer), but then you start to see the expected more of the expected dip in the crossover region.

KH80 Verical.png
In (sighted) listening comparisons, the Neumann is certainly the better speaker - to me, the best I've heard in a nearfield config at home - but the JBL puts in an impressive performance nonetheless. The latter is also easier to set up; its dispersion performance at steep vertical angles suggest reflected sound from a desk will be more similar in character to the original sound. Meanwhile, Neumann specifies you should raise the KH80 to avoid desk reflections.

This all makes some sense of course; the KH80 is a "pro" speaker, and typical buyers will be more likely to spay special attention to placement and whatnot. But while the 104 is part of JBL's Pro family, it's price point is definitely more entry-level and aimed at newbies. It's a solid option as an affordable desktop speaker that allows you to get good sound and stable imaging with little-to-no attention to placement.

Anyways, I think this all just goes to show that you tend to get more for your money with studio monitors =]
 

Attachments

  • KH80 Horizontal.png
    KH80 Horizontal.png
    95.1 KB · Views: 175
Last edited:

leonroy

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
80
Likes
96
Location
London, UK
I use old Kef uni-q. They're cheap now because almost all of them have tweeters that need service and kef no longer carries replacements. They're easy to service though.

Not to derail the thread but are these the old ferro fluid filled tweeters you’re referring to? Any tips or links on how to service them?
 

bigx5murf

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 6, 2018
Messages
522
Likes
343

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,155
Likes
16,833
Location
Central Fl
I'm still rev'd up hoping to hear the new JBL HDI series at the Tampa show next month???
image

 

stunta

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,401
Location
Boston, MA
I'm still rev'd up hoping to hear the new JBL HDI series at the Tampa show next month???
image


"We've got a lot of audiophile details on 'em". That kind of statement always confuses me.

They didn't say if any of these are active speakers.
 

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,155
Likes
16,833
Location
Central Fl
Top Bottom