Thanks a lot for your compliments!JaapD.
I am, with 100% accuracy, the complete opposite of your very, very narrow worldview on how technology should be utilized. If Genelec can make its speakers more efficient and better in all areas, including the midrange, which is now just called a coaxial element, then it's obvious that it should be used in all models where it improves sound quality.
If people are not ambitious enough to take even a single step forward, the world will not develop much at all. Fortunately, some of us look further into the future and try to solve various problems that others have not yet thought about deeply enough in their small and very, very tight minds.
In any case, the current path of technological development makes it possible to bring sound to a larger scale. The coaxial element has obviously been developed further than the limits of the former 10xx product family's midrange element, so if the potential for that development exists, it will certainly not be left unexploited.
I really, really like the 1238a, but wouldn’t call it a mid field monitor myself. I would call a main monitor a far field monitor but you may have a different perception which is fine of course. Purpose for far field monitors like the 1238a, according Genelec’s website, “ …. for professionals in larger rooms who demand perfect mix translation….”Genelec calls 1238a both "mid field" and "main monitor". Do you not think the new will be the same, given the similar presumable size and specs? What defines a "main monitor" according to you?
I have listened to the 8361 on several occasions, and have absolutely nothing bad to say against them, other than that they could benefit from adding a W371. Also particularly without the W371 I don’t see them as far field / main monitors, like for instance the 1238a.JaapD
Just a basic question. Because you can't always know what people's experiences are.
Have you actually had a chance to listen properly to Genelec's 8331/8341/8351/8361 "Ones" series anywhere yet?
And if you have, what did the audio experience sound like at the time?
Ok, it seems opinions differ on near-, mid and farfield. Personally I prefer to sit close, due to cross talk and such, but I also like to take a step back and listen a little further back once in a while. Takes a good room to sit further away, though.I really, really like the 1238a, but wouldn’t call it a mid field monitor myself. I would call a main monitor a far field monitor but you may have a different perception which is fine of course. Purpose for far field monitors like the 1238a, according Genelec’s website, “ …. for professionals in larger rooms who demand perfect mix translation….”
How do you know this? Have you listened to them all?No high-end speaker on the market can do the same.
You make grandiose claims but, when challenged, run to your imagined high ground. JBL, Meyer Sound, to name just two speaker manufacturers capable of taking you to your “heavenly heights”, whatever that means!caught gesture.
I won't get into these children's counter-ball games. But if no names come up, then the progress of the matter will stop here, thank you. I'm still not changing my position. Maybe someone else can refute my argument better.
Good luck to the entrepreneurs.
Meyer Sound Bluehorn System, Linear Peak SPL 130 dB, so, yes, chest pressure in time with music from a distance of 3-4 metres.(https://docs.meyersound.com/products/en/datasheet---bluehorn-system.html)Can these two manufacturers create chest pressure in time with music from a distance of 3-4 meters?
132.3 dB SPL!Danley HRE, choose your speaker for application.
Keith