DSJR
Master Contributor
Now you've torn it
Now you've torn it
I mean yes...View attachment 484537
The M2 is much bigger, 50 inch tall vs 32 inch of the 8380
I wonder if the bigger cabinet also means it has more bass output
Really suggest you do some reading on speaker design.I wonder if the bigger cabinet also means it has more bass output
Which one would you choose between them?Really suggest you do some reading on speaker design.
In the case of the M2, yes, it does have lower bass extension. But it really isn't that simple.
Neither. They're both way too big for my space.Which one would you choose between them?
The 8380 can be used as nearfieldNeither. They're both way too big for my space.
No, I mean I literally can't make speakers bigger than KH420s work.The 8380 can be used as nearfield![]()
I agree with these wishes.Really suggest you do some reading on speaker design.
In the case of the M2, yes, it does have lower bass extension. But it really isn't that simple.
View attachment 484537
The M2 is much bigger, 50 inch tall vs 32 inch of the 8380
I wonder if the bigger cabinet also means it has more bass output
This can be made from LED neon flexNow you've torn itI'll always see this picture when looking at them now
![]()
That's an unfair comparison, you should compare them with the real big boys.View attachment 484537
The M2 is much bigger, 50 inch tall vs 32 inch of the 8380
I wonder if the bigger cabinet also means it has more bass output
I compared because they both have 15 inch woofersThat's an unfair comparison, you should compare them with the real big boys.
15" on its own says nothing, its the added volume that matters as well.I compared because they both have 15 inch woofers
Sensing a bit of national bias hereJBL has chosen a 2-way design with an 800 Hz crossover for the M2, which at that height of the woofer creates a massive crater in the room response from floor reflection. A complete idiotic choice for such a speaker.
Genelec is able to avoid this with a 3-way design and a 470 Hz crossover, strategically placed on a 20-30 cm stand.
In a practical room situation, Genelec has the aforementioned acoustic advantage already due to its basic design and completes the knockout with its other top features. The JBL M2 has no chance. The 8380 sorts it out so hard that the beating can be heard all the way to the Alaskan audio observation station.
Maybe, maybe not. But I do think Pekka has a serious point. Let’s focus on some facts. JBL does have a high crossover point with 800 Hz and a 15 inch driver. Some of their other designs with 1000-1200 Hz on 12 inch drivers. Far from ideal if you’d ask me, likely a net result from being only a two way system. I find Genelec’s 470 Hz already a bit on the high side but significantly better in that regard.Sensing a bit of national bias here![]()