Shotgun Rico
Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2026
- Messages
- 60
- Likes
- 94
Just got an email for this. Is this going to be a new thing in audio, calling it AI powered?
My thought exactly - AI might probably do a better job than a beginner.I asked them at the show if you could converse with AI and tell it you want less bass, more highs, etc. They said yes. If so, then it might be useful to masses who don't want to mess with or learn what PEQ is.
The specs look ok so it’s probably a decent DAC with funky looks that’ll appeal to some based on looks alone.I asked them at the show if you could converse with AI and tell it you want less bass, more highs, etc. They said yes. If so, then it might be useful to masses who don't want to mess with or learn what PEQ is.
AI is like everything else. Crap in crap out. It all boils down the input, their definitions, and how the massage is. In general, I don't really appreciate external access to pherperials, thus it all depends upon how they approach that.The specs look ok so it’s probably a decent DAC with funky looks that’ll appeal to some based on looks alone.
Nothing wrong with having AI assisted EQ. Fosi says it links to an EQ database (AutoEq ?) so it might produce good results.
Of course AI has its issues. But I think pejorative terms like AI Slop are used too much and too dismissively. In my day to day work as a C++ programmer, AI is very useful when used carefully.
You’re probably right.The very good thing about this is thanks to Topping?) every Tom, Dick and Harry trading own made audio devices for cash will deliver PEQ. If they don't 2 year from now, they are enroute to the undertaker.
Not sure if I'll be pleased with what's on order, if contrary to belief I am, I'll just leave it at that. If not, I'll be considering IKM Studio Arc, and see where that takes me. For the desktop, I use software aswell, but I have a couple of profiles on the dac. Low budget, nothing fancy at all.You’re probably right.
I have DACs with built in PEQ but still tend to use software such as JRiver or Neutron player that have full DSP that I can adjust on screen, usually with instant results.
But that’s just my personal preference.
Manufacturers will put features into products if it keeps them competitive, even if they don’t add a ton of value.
Not to mention the further decline in critical thinking skills...to be utterly maddening, because they seem willfully blind and oblivious or just callously indifferent to all of the dire economic, political, environmental, and moral externalities of consumer AI.
You can always measure before and after, and that will caretake the ASR aspect for you. For sure, it bypasses the user requirement of competence. That's what happens when tech drizzle down. Nothing new in the music industry, tons of music would never have happened without cheap plastic Macs. Cher got sh*tloads of ridicule when she chose to use Autotune, and it annoyed me when I recognized the usage. I used to be into Stones, and I heard a recording or was it concert where Jagger's voice was just about useless. A year later, a fresh release with perfect voice.I find the bland milquetoast “don’t be mean to AI” and “don’t say AI slop” and “AI has enormous advantages” and “this is fine” and “conversing with a powered-by-AI agent about simplifying your DAC’s mind-bogglingly complex PEQ settings seems like perfectly benign appropriate technology and product innovation to me here at Audio Science Review” responses to this small symptom of the times, to be utterly maddening, because they seem willfully blind and oblivious or just callously indifferent to all of the dire economic, political, environmental, and moral externalities of consumer AI.
At a site that’s passionate about reality-based eyes-wide-open objective rigor, this seems like self-complacent subjective madness with blinders on.