• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

New Collaboration with Ascilab!

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're making assumptions that there will not be adequate checks and balances. I do not share your concerns. That's just me.
 
You're making assumptions that there will not be adequate checks and balances. I do not share your concerns
I'm not assuming anything, but sharing research findings on a topic.
The possibility of countermeasures is in the last paragraph. Whether these are used is entirely up to the valued seller.
 
To counteract these effects, researchers recommend concrete strategies: seek external, independent evaluations; expose products to critical user feedback; benchmark prices and quality against comparable offerings; and cultivate a mindset of constructive skepticism, even toward one’s own work.
Great summary. Are you in this field? It reminds me of the study where wine prices changed people's preferences. My whole point is the bias is unavoidable. TIL
 
I'm getting a bit sick of reading all this stuff, people have already had their say at this point in time, we're going around in circles. Let's just knock it on the head, it's not like the naysayers are gonna be convinced, they just have to suck it up after they've written their dissent or concerns now at least once or twice or more.
 
I'm getting a bit sick of reading all this stuff, people have already had their say at this point in time, we're going around in circles. Let's just knock it on the head, it's not like the naysayers are gonna be convinced, they just have to suck it up after they've written their dissent or concerns now at least once or twice or more.
You do realize it would have all been put to bed had Amir simply responded with "I hear everyone's concerns and we are taking them into account. We will be doing xyz to make sure ASR stays just as it is. Of course all posts moving forward will be in the dealers forum per the site's rules." That's diplomacy at work. Everyone would go about their day.

I'm not a naysayer. I believe in AsciLab. I think their offerings are great.

Here is my first post on this thread

Out of all the products you could have chosen to back and work with, this is probably the best one with the best fit for ASR. It's like saying there can be bias in an air quality measurement. The proof is in the proverbial pudding.
 
Last edited:
You do realize it would have all been put to bed had Amir simply responded with "I hear everyone's concerns and we are taking them into account. We will be doing xyz to make sure ASR stays just as it is. Of course all posts moving forward will be in the dealers forum per the site's rules." That's diplomacy at work. Everyone would go about their day.
This is his answer to you and others:

Mostly summarized here: https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...collaboration-with-ascilab.63670/post-2336587

And further amended and clarify here:

The decision is already made and all possible fate has been accepted. To help you move on, understand that all consumers are accountable for their own purchasing decision, don't blame it on reviewer, just be cognizant of all the commercial relationships influencer has and do your own research and own up to your decision. That's that and move on.
 
This is his answer to you and others:

Mostly summarized here: https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...collaboration-with-ascilab.63670/post-2336587

And further amended and clarify here:

The decision is already made and all possible fate has been accepted. To help you move on, understand that all consumers are accountable for their own purchasing decision, don't blame it on reviewer, just be cognizant of all the commercial relationships influencer has and do your own research and own up to your decision. That's that and move on.
I'd moved on, but I want to address you since you've responded to me.

Where does it answer my question of why these posts shouldn't be in the dealers section along with others? I also think it's shortsighted to run a business that way. Telling anonymous forum audio nerds to fall in line, fine that's his prerogative, but to tell customers take it or leave it without any consideration or mention of "we hear you," doesn't sit well with me. You have to remember I am no longer just a forum member I am also a customer. You can't treat customers like you would forum members you disagree with, or I guess you can but then you lose out on business rather than being diplomatic. Heck I am not even asking for him to change policy. I, and I would assume others, simply want the same rules to be applied to him that apply to others, along with him even acknowledging what people are requesting on both sides of this argument.
 
Are you in this field?
For a long time, I was mainly involved in practice and research, linking qualitative data (human emotions, pain perception, mental health) with quantitative data for the development of therapies and medication.

What I have written here was more of a side aspect of this work.
 
For a long time, I was mainly involved in practice and research, linking qualitative data (human emotions, pain perception, mental health) with quantitative data for the development of therapies and medication.

What I have written here was more of a side aspect of this work.
Fascinating. It's good to know.
 
I'd moved on, but I want to address you since you've responded to me.

Where does it answer my question of why these posts shouldn't be in the dealers section along with others? I also think it's shortsighted to run a business that way. Telling anonymous forum audio nerds to fall in line, fine that's his prerogative, but to tell customers take it or leave it without any consideration or mention of "we hear you," doesn't sit well with me. You have to remember I am no longer just a forum member I am also a customer. You can't treat customers like you would forum members you disagree with, or I guess you can but then you lose out on business rather than being diplomatic. Heck I am not even asking for him to change policy. I, and I would assume others, simply want the same rules to be applied to him that apply to others, along with him even acknowledging what people are requesting on both sides of this argument.


Again, all in this post: https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...collaboration-with-ascilab.63670/post-2336587

Read it carefully, word for word and if you still don't have your answer, PM me and I will attempt to explain it to you. But it is crystal clear to me.
 
As ASR has science integrated into its name, it is advisable to broaden your horizons from time to time and also look at other areas of science.
Said goal will not happen with you posting AI generated text. If you have real research that says why someone like me has to forever be corrupted by money, let's see it. Otherwise I suggest you broaden your horizon that not all humans are dominated by desire for more wealth.
 
Said goal will not happen with you posting AI generated text. If you have real research that says why someone like me has to forever be corrupted by money, let's see it. Otherwise I suggest you broaden your horizon that not all humans are dominated by desire for more wealth.
He wasn’t even saying that any of that applied to you.

You’re accusing someone of faking their own words in the same sentence where you state that it’s not possible for you to do anything bad and people shouldn’t accuse you of any impropriety.

Looking at @Audionaut and his posts. He seems pretty smart and capable of writing something about general human tendencies to me.

edit: No way of knowing whether its AI 100%. I've written things and had AI clean up the text, but that doesn't mean it changed my written message. It still stands that none of that was applied to you. It was a science based look at human behavior.

edit 2: I stand corrected and it does look like he used AI but still would be good to let him explain why or how.
 
Last edited:
Please forgive my poor English.

Thank you, Amirm, for founding and maintaining ASR and even reviewing the product. Respect and appreciation.
I also support and congratulate you on your new decision to start business with Acsilab.


In my opinion.
Forum owner can make the rules for the forum. (Or maybe there is some specific procedure for making the forum rules?)
Moderators manage the forum according to the rules.
ASR can participate if they agree to the "Terms and rules." Forum owners and moderators should also be able to participate without any problems (probably).
Forum participants are obligated to abide by the Terms and rules.

If Amirm has a vested interest in Ascilab, I think this thread and the Ascilab survey thread should have been posted in the "Desperate Dealers Forum", even though it's a bit complicated.

What about future reviews of Ascilab products? If you post one in review forum, will it violate the forum rules?
The owner can add rules that give special treatment to Ascilab. Or they can abolish the "dealer rule" altogether. That way, even dealers can post Ascilab products elsewhere.
On the other hand, I feel that if unfair treatment of each manufacturer occurs, the great advantage of ASR will be lost.

Short summary:
- I want the rules to be applied fairly.
- I want manufacturers to be treated fairly.
 
Said goal will not happen with you posting AI generated text. If you have real research that says why someone like me has to forever be corrupted by money, let's see it. Otherwise I suggest you broaden your horizon that not all humans are dominated by desire for more wealth.
His post was excellent, and I don't think it was directed at you.

All science carries bias, no matter how sincerely someone believes they're not susceptible to it. It's human nature to have some bias, and a fundamental part of of science is to identify and acknowledge the effects bias may have on any body of evidence.

If this forum is supposed to represent objectivity in sound reproduction and how we experience high fidelity music reproduction. All bias should be acknowledged and efforts to counteract it should be stated.

Without this we continue to give HiFi subjectivists more evidence that we are not what we say we are.

This was not AI generated, but you could probably already tell ;)
 
I hate to predict as such, but the only victim I see coming out of this thread is Ascilab themselves.
And it's a pity, as they started with what seem to be the best intentions.

Can we give it time?
 
How exactly can AsciLAB become a victim?
Keith
 
How exactly can AsciLAB become a victim?
Keith
I imagine the other member feels that this whole ridiculously overblown discussion may taint potential customers who will avoid buying Ascilab. I don't think that will happen in any meaningful way, but it is a possibility that some people will react negatively towards the brand.
 
How exactly can AsciLAB become a victim?
Keith
Anything other than the technical aspects should be irrelevant, that's why.
There's a reason why good marketing schools are so expensive and there's a reason why we keep engineers, owners, etc far and away from them (marketing dept) in order to do what they know best.

Keeping it strictly professional (to each one's field) is not the worst idea.
 
Have AsciLAB published anything other than technical specifications and measurements?
Keith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom