• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

NEW BRZHifi PAD-30 : Dual TPA3255 +PFFB @ $99

As Amir has said, amps are more prone to errors due to higher power, heat etc
I'm not too worried about any of the amps I own, they all run quite hot with the exception of Topping MX3s which runs cooler than the DX1 II DAC
 
Last edited:
look amazon and return ,even brzhifi : all class d : too young , too cheap , too overboost : its farwest :p
I rarely bother, if it gets a GREAT review here (and other places) and it's something I am interested in, I resist the urge to be an early adopter and wait 90 days.
Then I try to do "due diligence" to see if I can figure out if it has a higher or lower failure rate than what I (just me) thinks it should be (yeah, I know, it should be ZERO, but that is not realistic (and 'some' people may cause their own failure rate). For me, the failure rate becomes a bit of a game. So I check about monthly for the next 3 months (so we are now at six months since I first saw a good review on something 'new' that interests me). At that point, I decide if I think it is worth taking a chance on. And I either buy it or not.
And, likely, by then, another new thing comes along that I am interested in.
I am at the point were I really don't "NEED" anything.
So, for me to buy some additional stereo gear is rare.
In the last 2 years I have bought the S.M.S.L. PL200 CD player and the MMPRO MKII phono stage hand made by Michael Fidler.
 
always the same old thing : YES 30 year tv work / computer / amp BUT you paid 2/3 time the price of today . ALL forget the price .. my sony 55 cm crt was pays 5000 F in year 90 , 900 euro ,2500 e with inflation 55 cm , we have LG C5 at 800 euro for 100 cm ( 55 inch ) .you have AMP class D for the price of the remote of old thing

chat gpt : SONY 55 cm 1993 : 1500 euro on price today with inflation , remote 130 euro in today price to buy a TV you pays 6,8 % of yourmonth money 93 or today : the difference : price dow by 10
I would much rather pay much more than to have CRAP that breaks frequently.
That is exactly why I will never buy "CHEAP". It's stressful when you are just trying to relax and gear just quits. It's time consuming and a hassle to deal with replacing it.
If it's going to be that way, I would just rather not have it.
Quality will always cost more up front.
But not having "CHEAP" for gear gives benefits for years and years, as the average cost of the gear goes down every day it keeps working.
People have too much stress in their lives (and many die from it).
Yep, I paid more (and the amortized price is really, really inexpensive per day of use. Continuously wasting time [my time is worth $50 an hour for me to do the work that I do for others]), replacing constantly breaking items is not worth my time or the stress it causes. Plus, better gear, can (for the most part), be easily repaired.
I typically have multiple duplicates of of every piece in my system (actually of most things in my life, if I buy something and I really like it, I buy another one so that I can just swap it out when [more likely IF {because I typically buy quality and reliability, there by paying more up front} it goes down). Because, unfortunatel, realy good stuff has a tendency to no longer be available later down the line. Same with shoes, pants, shirts, cooking gear, etc, etc.
It's very rare for me to not be able to just swap to a working unit of something when an item quits working.
Then I can repair or replace the defective one on MY schedule.
I don't have much (and I don't buy to show off for others that I have the latest, greatest things, or buy into trends), so I am NOT one of the Jones'es that people are looking up to when they are tryng to keep up with the Jones'es.
Just a steady state guy with gear that rarely breaks. Not the latest bling, but stuff that lasts and lasts.
 
Last edited:
Does this have anything to do with BRZHifi PAD-30 ?

Starting yiur own thread is easy, and Free!
 
Compared to 3255 it has lower power, higher THD and internal DAC, which prevents from using PFFB. What so good about it?
Its clearly inferior to the TPA3255 as an amplifier, but what would interest me (if there were an inexpensive finished amp unit based on it) is the digital processing available on-chip. With 12 biquads per channel and various other processing features, it could conceivably be the basis for a very inexpensive active crossover-amplifier for modest DIY active speakers.
I'd love to have a $75 alternative to a Hypex FA-123. Sure it would be lower-power and lower-performing, but likely sufficient for some pretty nice speakers.
 
Back
Top Bottom