Very cool effort!
You may not be surprised to find the crowd here is cranky about ... everything ... and so hopefully the comments aren't too unproductive here.
My personal thoughts / notes: The first logo reads more like "AVR" to me than "ASR", despite the coloration. To me this is a big risk in this space since "AVR" is a commonly used acronym here.
The second version reads like "ASR" but IMO the "R" is too broken-up so the legibility and overall look could be improved.
I think some variations on these might work better if the italics angle is a little smaller. Then you could pull the "R" together while keeping the basic elements of the A and S more or less how they are.
I do really like how you've treated the "Audio Science Review" text to the right of the "ASR". Feels clean and sophisticated. However, if I were to give my overall thought on the logo, it feels like it's trending a bit "tech" or "gamer" vs. "scientific reporting" so maybe there is some debate to be had about the branding cues going into the design, too.
Not an art director, but did an art minor in college, have worked in marketing for good while, done a bit of logo design myself when nobody else was available, and of course have participated in many design processes. In fact, there's been a branding or re-branding process at some point in every job I've had. A bit of a coincidence I guess. One opinion among many, just thought I should explain why I felt I had any reason to give more detailed feedback.