skankhobag
Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2025
- Messages
- 49
- Likes
- 59
I looked at the new Alcons M monitors and I’m not quite sure why anyone would want to buy them.
Hey, their tweeter seems fantastic.
Whether their Back EMF Reduction driver design actually makes much difference has yet to be seen (most especially in a midrange driver which is rather unlikely).
There’s a bunch of useless hype about the tweeter having 50:1 peak to constant power rating. In other words, it’s really hard burn it out by driving the speaker hard. That’s good, but certainly not revolutionary.
There’s no mention of the cabinet being especially dead and that it uses a novel port design is uncompelling. So what? Personally, I have no interest in ported speakers.
Now, let’s look at what really sucks about this design.
I have nothing against any type of active design and its amp configuration whether onboard or external, but the way they’ve gone about this is rather bizarre.
Why, if you’re offering an active speaker, would you insist on using a non-standard and seemingly proprietary method to connect both the inputs and outputs?
Check out the image. Do you want to deal with interfacing with that?
Then, also, what are the amp specs? Not given.
I’d really love to see an extensive review of of this system. Honestly, I’m sure it’s damn good, but very dubious that it’s revolutionary.
My initial thought is that the mids and woofers would benefit greater by being Purifi’s designs which offer drastically lower distortion than standard offerings due to their suspensions rather than a novel voice coil.
I imagine the price for all of this is pretty steep. There’s no information about that.
Bottom line: other than the tweeter, I’m not the least bit impressed.
Hey, their tweeter seems fantastic.
Whether their Back EMF Reduction driver design actually makes much difference has yet to be seen (most especially in a midrange driver which is rather unlikely).
There’s a bunch of useless hype about the tweeter having 50:1 peak to constant power rating. In other words, it’s really hard burn it out by driving the speaker hard. That’s good, but certainly not revolutionary.
There’s no mention of the cabinet being especially dead and that it uses a novel port design is uncompelling. So what? Personally, I have no interest in ported speakers.
Now, let’s look at what really sucks about this design.
I have nothing against any type of active design and its amp configuration whether onboard or external, but the way they’ve gone about this is rather bizarre.
Why, if you’re offering an active speaker, would you insist on using a non-standard and seemingly proprietary method to connect both the inputs and outputs?
Check out the image. Do you want to deal with interfacing with that?
Then, also, what are the amp specs? Not given.
I’d really love to see an extensive review of of this system. Honestly, I’m sure it’s damn good, but very dubious that it’s revolutionary.
My initial thought is that the mids and woofers would benefit greater by being Purifi’s designs which offer drastically lower distortion than standard offerings due to their suspensions rather than a novel voice coil.
I imagine the price for all of this is pretty steep. There’s no information about that.
Bottom line: other than the tweeter, I’m not the least bit impressed.