I rely on science and measurements - including Amir's measurements here on ASR. That is the basic of this forum - science.He's a Neumann fanboy. Literally to the point he thinks that they can do no wrong.
I rely on science and measurements - including Amir's measurements here on ASR. That is the basic of this forum - science.He's a Neumann fanboy. Literally to the point he thinks that they can do no wrong.
If you think measurements are everything, you're missing the bigger picture. Take headphones, for example: I might listen to a pair that's technically "brighter" than the HD 800S, yet feel fatigue or even discomfort with the HD 800S, which measures as less bright. There's a lot of psychoacoustics involved—how we perceive sound can be very different from what the raw measurements suggest.I rely on science and measurements - including Amir's measurements here on ASR. That is the basic of this forum - science.
This is Audio Science Review.If you think measurements are everything, you're missing the bigger picture. Take headphones, for example: I might listen to a pair that's technically "brighter" than the HD 800S, yet feel fatigue or even discomfort with the HD 800S, which measures as less bright. There's a lot of psychoacoustics involved—how we perceive sound can be very different from what the raw measurements suggest.
Then there's the head-related transfer function (HRTF), which means that what you hear might not match what is measured, due to your unique anatomy. Beyond that, when it comes to speakers, some are less sensitive to room acoustics and don’t demand perfect conditions to sound good.
Th
This is Audio Science Review.
maybe don't mention it to your seller, sinus test tones can potentially destroy equipment if too loud@bitels for testing speakers a sine wave sweep is the best method and to be able to manually sweep is preferred. Use this...>
I have frequency swept thousands of speakers with a sine wave. If done with common sense it is not harmful. It is the only way to test a speaker at all frequencies while testing for defects/faults. How do you think warranty service depots and manufacturers test? They do it with sine waves. Don't blast the tweeters super loud and don't drive the woofers to the stops... The member is using a 50 Hz YouTube video. He can obviously manage that.maybe don't mention it to your seller, sinus test tones can potentially destroy equipment if too loud
That said, the 120 II is also pretty juiced - it has lower LFX than the HS8.
Speaker's are brand new, did not open them, but no resonances when knocking.
I can not here it on:
Yamaha hs8
Eve sc207
Dt 770pro
JBL flip 4
Mixcube
I am 1000% positive, it is not in the recordings.
I’m@bitels the sound in the video you posted is of something rattling inside, probably a wire from amp to driver if I had to guess..That said, the 120 II is also pretty juiced - it has lower LFX than the HS8. It is entirely possible you're hitting its SPL limits. I can see the driver moving which means there's quite substantial excursion going on.
What generation of mtm?please let us know what neumann says, if you tell them whats going on with your speakers.
i really wonder whats causing the problem. i've only hat some farting/rattling issues with the ports of the small iloud mtms, when playing below 50hz, which i would say is acceptable for such a small speaker. i would guess your speakers maybe defectiv.
Isn't this model protected with compression?@bitels the sound in the video you posted is of something rattling inside, probably a wire from amp to driver if I had to guess..That said, the 120 II is also pretty juiced - it has lower LFX than the HS8. It is entirely possible you're hitting its SPL limits. I can see the driver moving which means there's quite substantial excursion going on.
Info from Neumann, I am not shure if they checked provided audio or not.Dear Patryk,
thanks for providing the audiofiles for further analyses.
I got feedback from our productmanagement team and also from development department.
Speakers with ports generally have a strong flow in the channels at the tuning frequency. As the level increases, this will eventually become audible, no matter how much effort is put into the port geometry. In principle, a closed system with a larger driver has no port noise. If the ports are at the rear, as with the Yamaha monitor, they are not so audible from the front, but they have other disadvantages.
At some point, every loudspeaker comes to an end and parasitic effects become perceptible.
- Yamaha has a larger woofer with a larger cabinet volume and a different tuning frequency of the BR system
- BR port on Yamaha is at the rear, so port noise is less audible at the front
It is highly unlikely that the speakers are defective, as they are extensively checked for cabinet resonances during the final inspection. Probably simply a limitation of a compact 5.25” loudspeaker.
Here is a link to video highlighting this problem.
There's ones taken by Dr. Anselm Goertz in the Sound & Recording review though. Anechoic chamber with sub-100 Hz spliced in.I'm pretty sure it hasn't, there's no Klippel measurements of HS8 that I know of,
While the distortion figures of HS7 are not that good overall at moderate levels, the sub 50Hz distortion at 96dB is pretty remarkable so it's probably even better in HS8
There's ones taken by Dr. Anselm Goertz in the Sound & Recording review though. Anechoic chamber with sub-100 Hz spliced in.
View attachment 399056
A few Hz lower than the KH120 II still.
View attachment 399064
View attachment 399065
I think the woofer isn't the last word in electrical nonlinearity (no surprise), and low-midrange max SPL may be amplifier limited.